• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我采集与医护人员采集拭子用于鉴定孕晚期阴道直肠群链球菌定植:系统评价。

Self-collected versus health-care professional taken swab for identification of vaginal-rectal colonisation with group B streptococcus in late pregnancy: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.

Nottingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Nottingham, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.027
PMID:37229964
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Testing for group B streptococcus (GBS) requires a vaginal-rectal swab in late pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic review of the test accuracy of a self-collected swab compared with a health-care professional collected swab in the diagnosis of GBS colonisation.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Library (including the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects [DARE] and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials [CENTRAL]), EMBASE, MEDLINE and Trip were searched in May 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials, test accuracy studies or diagnostic yield studies that compared the accuracy of a self-collected vaginal-rectal swab, compared to that taken by a health-care professional, for the detection of GBS colonisation in the third trimester.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two researchers independently screened, selected studies, extracted data and assessed study quality.

MAIN RESULTS

10 studies, with 2578 women were included. Pooled sensitivity of self-collected swabs was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.81 to 0.95) and pooled specificity was 0.98 (95% CI 0.96 to 0.99).

CONCLUSION

This study provides reassuring evidence that self-collected swabs for maternal GBS colonisation are highly accurate relative to swabs collected by health-care professionals. Women requiring a swab for GBS colonisation can self-swab with appropriate instructions if they choose.

FUNDING

Personal fellowship from the University of Nottingham for KFW.

摘要

背景

检测 B 组链球菌(GBS)需要在妊娠晚期进行阴道直肠拭子检测。

目的

对自我采集拭子与医护人员采集拭子在诊断 GBS 定植方面的检测准确性进行系统评价。

检索策略

2022 年 5 月,对 Cochrane 图书馆(包括 Cochrane 系统评价数据库、效应摘要数据库 [DARE] 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库 [CENTRAL])、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 Trip 进行了检索。

选择标准

比较自我采集的阴道直肠拭子与医护人员采集的拭子在检测第三孕期 GBS 定植方面的准确性的随机试验、检测准确性研究或诊断收益研究。

数据收集和分析

两名研究人员独立筛选、选择研究、提取数据并评估研究质量。

主要结果

纳入了 10 项研究,共 2578 名女性。自我采集拭子的汇总敏感性为 0.90(95%置信区间 [CI] 0.81 至 0.95),汇总特异性为 0.98(95% CI 0.96 至 0.99)。

结论

这项研究提供了令人安心的证据,表明与医护人员采集的拭子相比,自我采集的拭子用于检测母体 GBS 定植具有很高的准确性。如果女性选择自我采集拭子进行 GBS 定植检测,可以在获得适当的指导后进行自我采集。

资助

诺丁汉大学为 KFW 提供的个人奖学金。

相似文献

1
Self-collected versus health-care professional taken swab for identification of vaginal-rectal colonisation with group B streptococcus in late pregnancy: a systematic review.自我采集与医护人员采集拭子用于鉴定孕晚期阴道直肠群链球菌定植:系统评价。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jul;286:95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 22.
2
Rapid testing for group B streptococcus during labour: a test accuracy study with evaluation of acceptability and cost-effectiveness.分娩期间B族链球菌的快速检测:一项关于检测准确性、可接受性及成本效益评估的研究
Health Technol Assess. 2009 Sep;13(42):1-154, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta13420.
3
Intrapartum tests for group B streptococcus: accuracy and acceptability of screening.B 组链球菌产时检测:筛查的准确性和可接受性。
BJOG. 2011 Jan;118(2):257-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02725.x. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
4
Vaginal-perianal or vaginal-perineal compared with vaginal-rectal culture-based screening for Group B Streptococci (GBS) colonization during the third trimester of pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.妊娠晚期基于阴道 - 肛周或阴道 - 会阴与阴道 - 直肠培养的B族链球菌(GBS)定植筛查比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04546-w.
5
Group B colonisation and their antimicrobial susceptibility among pregnant women attending antenatal clinics in tertiary care hospitals in the Western Province of Sri Lanka.斯里兰卡西部省份三级护理医院产前门诊孕妇中B组细菌定植情况及其药敏性
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Jan;41(1):1-6. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2020.1716313. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
6
Rapid intrapartum test for maternal group B streptococcal colonisation and its effect on antibiotic use in labouring women with risk factors for early-onset neonatal infection (GBS2): cluster randomised trial with nested test accuracy study.快速产时检测产妇 B 族链球菌定植及其对有早发型新生儿感染风险因素的产妇在产时使用抗生素的影响(GBS2):巢式病例对照试验的群组随机试验
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 14;20(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02202-2.
7
Rapid detection of Group B streptococcus directly from vaginal-rectal specimens using liquid swabs and the BD Max GBS assay.使用液体拭子和 BD Max GBS 检测试剂盒直接从阴道直肠标本中快速检测 B 群链球菌。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017 Dec;23(12):948-951. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 6.
8
Intrapartum polymerase chain reaction for detection of group B streptococcus colonisation.产时聚合酶链反应检测B族链球菌定植情况
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Jun;53(3):236-42. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12030. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
9
Self-collected versus health professional-collected genital swabs to identify the prevalence of group B streptococcus: a comparison of patient preference and efficacy.自我采集与医护人员采集的生殖器拭子用于确定B族链球菌的患病率:患者偏好与效果的比较
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Jul;139(1):43-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Feb 5.
10
The prevention of early-onset neonatal group B streptococcal disease.早发型新生儿B族链球菌病的预防
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Oct;35(10):939-948. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30818-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding GBS infection in pregnancy: exploring adverse maternal and pregnancy outcomes and the prospect of a GBS vaccine.了解妊娠期B族链球菌感染:探究不良孕产妇及妊娠结局以及B族链球菌疫苗的前景。
Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2025 Jul 8;12:20499361251343710. doi: 10.1177/20499361251343710. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Comparison of self-collected and healthcare worker-collected rectovaginal swabs for group B streptococcus detection in pregnancy using PCR with a commercial collection-enrichment device.使用商业采集富集装置通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)比较自我采集和医护人员采集的直肠阴道拭子在孕期检测B族链球菌中的应用。
Front Microbiol. 2025 Feb 5;16:1541319. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1541319. eCollection 2025.