Division of Prevention Science, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Division of pulmonary and critical care medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 25;23(1):950. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15957-5.
BACKGROUND: People with HIV (PWH) are disproportionately vulnerable to the impacts of wildfires, given the need for frequent access to healthcare systems, higher burden of comorbidities, higher food insecurity, mental and behavioral health challenges, and challenges of living with HIV in a rural area. In this study, we aim to better understand the pathways through which wildfires impact health outcomes among PWH. METHODS: From October 2021 through February 2022, we conducted individual semi-structured qualitative interviews with PWH impacted by the Northern California wildfires and clinicians of PWH who were impacted by wildfires. The study aims were to explore the influence of wildfires on the health of PWH and to discuss measures at the individual, clinic, and system levels that helped to mitigate these impacts. RESULTS: We interviewed 15 PWH and 7 clinicians. While some PWH felt that surviving the HIV epidemic added to their resilience against wildfires, many felt that the wildfires compounded the HIV-related traumas that they have experienced. Participants outlined five main routes by which wildfires negatively impacted their health: (1) access to healthcare (medications, clinics, clinic staff), (2) mental health (trauma; anxiety, depression, or stress; sleep disturbances; coping strategies), (3) physical health (cardiopulmonary, other co-morbidities), (4) social/economic impacts (housing, finances, community), and (5) nutrition and exercise. The recommendations for future wildfire preparedness were at the (1) individual-level (what to have during evacuation), (2) pharmacy-level (procedural, staffing), and (3) clinic- or county-level (funds and vouchers; case management; mental health services; emergency response planning; other services such as telehealth, home visits, home laboratory testing). CONCLUSIONS: Based on our data and prior research, we devised a conceptual framework that acknowledges the impact of wildfires at the community-, household-, and individual-level with implications for physical and mental health outcomes among PWH. These findings and framework can help in developing future interventions, programs, and policies to mitigate the cumulative impacts of extreme weather events on the health of PWH, particularly among individuals living in rural areas. Further studies are needed to examine health system strengthening strategies, innovative methods to improve access to healthcare, and community resilience through disaster preparedness. TRIAL REGISTRATION: N/A.
背景:鉴于需要频繁获得医疗保健系统的支持、更高的合并症负担、更高的粮食不安全程度、精神和行为健康挑战以及在农村地区生活的挑战,艾滋病毒感染者(PWH)极易受到野火影响。在这项研究中,我们旨在更好地了解野火影响 PWH 健康结果的途径。
方法:从 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 2 月,我们对受北加州野火影响的 PWH 和受野火影响的 PWH 临床医生进行了个人半结构化定性访谈。研究目的是探讨野火对 PWH 健康的影响,并讨论有助于减轻这些影响的个人、诊所和系统层面的措施。
结果:我们采访了 15 名 PWH 和 7 名临床医生。虽然一些 PWH 认为在艾滋病毒流行中幸存下来增加了他们对野火的适应能力,但许多人认为野火加剧了他们经历过的与艾滋病毒相关的创伤。参与者概述了野火对他们健康产生负面影响的五个主要途径:(1)获得医疗保健(药物、诊所、诊所工作人员),(2)心理健康(创伤;焦虑、抑郁或压力;睡眠障碍;应对策略),(3)身体健康(心肺,其他合并症),(4)社会/经济影响(住房、财务、社区),以及(5)营养和锻炼。未来野火准备工作的建议在(1)个人层面(疏散期间需要什么),(2)药房层面(程序、人员配备),以及(3)诊所或县一级(资金和代金券;病例管理;心理健康服务;应急规划;其他服务,如远程医疗、家访、家庭实验室测试)。
结论:根据我们的数据和先前的研究,我们设计了一个概念框架,该框架承认野火对社区、家庭和个人层面的影响,对 PWH 的身心健康结果有影响。这些发现和框架可以帮助制定未来的干预措施、计划和政策,以减轻极端天气事件对 PWH 健康的累积影响,特别是对生活在农村地区的个人。需要进一步研究以检验加强卫生系统的战略、改善获得医疗保健的创新方法,以及通过备灾提高社区的复原力。
试验注册:无。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-2-4
J Environ Manage. 2023-2-15
J Prim Care Community Health. 2019
BMJ Public Health. 2025-8-18
Curr Trop Med Rep. 2024-9
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2025-2-1
J Occup Med Toxicol. 2022-1-4
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021-9-27
Behav Sci (Basel). 2021-9-21
J Community Psychol. 2021-9
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2020-10
J Occup Environ Med. 2020-2