Institute of Life Science, Swansea University Medical School, Singelton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP Wales, United Kingdom.
Department of Environment and Health, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Mutagenesis. 2023 Aug 24;38(4):183-191. doi: 10.1093/mutage/gead017.
Genotoxicity testing for nanomaterials remains challenging as standard testing approaches require some adaptation, and further development of nano-specific OECD Test Guidelines (TGs) and Guidance Documents (GDs) are needed. However, the field of genotoxicology continues to progress and new approach methodologies (NAMs) are being developed that could provide relevant information on the range of mechanisms of genotoxic action that may be imparted by nanomaterials. There is a recognition of the need for implementation of new and/or adapted OECD TGs, new OECD GDs, and utilization of NAMs within a genotoxicity testing framework for nanomaterials. As such, the requirements to apply new experimental approaches and data for genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials in a regulatory context is neither clear, nor used in practice. Thus, an international workshop with representatives from regulatory agencies, industry, government, and academic scientists was convened to discuss these issues. The expert discussion highlighted the current deficiencies that exist in standard testing approaches within exposure regimes, insufficient physicochemical characterization, lack of demonstration of cell or tissue uptake and internalization, and limitations in the coverage of genotoxic modes of action. Regarding the latter aspect, a consensus was reached on the importance of using NAMs to support the genotoxicity assessment of nanomaterials. Also highlighted was the need for close engagement between scientists and regulators to (i) provide clarity on the regulatory needs, (ii) improve the acceptance and use of NAM-generated data, and (iii) define how NAMs may be used as part of weight of evidence approaches for use in regulatory risk assessments.
由于标准测试方法需要进行一些调整,因此纳米材料的遗传毒性测试仍然具有挑战性,需要进一步开发特定于纳米材料的 OECD 测试指南 (TGs) 和指导文件 (GDs)。然而,遗传毒理学领域仍在不断发展,新的方法学 (NAMs) 正在开发中,这些方法学可以提供有关纳米材料可能产生的遗传毒性作用机制的相关信息。人们认识到需要在纳米材料的遗传毒性测试框架内实施新的和/或经调整的 OECD TGs、新的 OECD GDs 以及利用 NAMs。因此,在监管背景下对纳米材料的遗传毒性评估应用新的实验方法和数据的要求既不清楚,也未在实践中使用。因此,召集了一个由监管机构、工业界、政府和学术科学家代表参加的国际研讨会,以讨论这些问题。专家讨论强调了目前在暴露条件下的标准测试方法中存在的缺陷,包括物理化学特性描述不足、缺乏细胞或组织摄取和内化的证明,以及遗传毒性作用模式的覆盖范围有限。关于后者,与会者一致认为,利用 NAMs 支持纳米材料的遗传毒性评估非常重要。还强调了科学家和监管机构之间密切合作的必要性,以(i)阐明监管需求,(ii)提高对 NAM 生成数据的接受和使用程度,以及 (iii)定义 NAMs 如何作为证据权重方法的一部分,用于监管风险评估。