• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

栖息地差异对温带森林中啮齿动物(哺乳纲,啮齿目)分散贮藏行为的影响。

Effects of habitat differences on the scatter-hoarding behaviour of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia) in temperate forests.

作者信息

Li Dianwei, Liu Jiahui, Zhang Chengzhi, Cao Yuwei, Gao Ming, Jin Zhimin, Shan Hongjia, Ni Hongwei

机构信息

Heilongjiang Academy of Forestry, No. 134 Haping Road, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150081, China Heilongjiang Academy of Forestry Harbin China.

College of Life Sciences and Technology, Mudanjiang Normal University, No. 191 Wenhua Road, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang 157011, China Mudanjiang Normal University Mudanjiang China.

出版信息

Zookeys. 2023 Jan 20;1141:169-183. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1141.96883. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3897/zookeys.1141.96883
PMID:37234965
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10208085/
Abstract

To discover the differences in hoarding strategies of rodents for different seeds in different habitats, we labelled and released three different types of seeds, including , , and , in temperate forests of northeastern China and investigated the fate of seeds in four different habitats that included a broad-leaved forest, mixed-forest edge, mixed forest, and artificial larch forest. Our research showed that the hoarding strategy of rodents was found to vary substantially in different habitats. The survival curves of seeds from different habitats showed the same trend, but the rates of consumption in different habitats varied. More than 50% of the seeds in the four habitats were consumed by the tenth day. It took 20 days to consume more than 70% of the seeds. The rate of consumption of seeds reached 96.70%; 99.09% of the seeds were consumed, and 93.07% of the seeds were consumed. The seeds were consumed most quickly in the artificial larch forest. In general, most of the early seeds were quickly devoured. After day 20, the consumption gradually decreased. Rodents found the seeds in the artificial larch forest in a shorter average time than those in the other types of forests. The average earliest discovery time was 1.4 ± 0.9 d (1-3 d). The average earliest discovery time in all the other three habitats exceeded 7 d. The median removal times (MRT) was distributed around the seeds at 14.24 ± 10.53 d (1-60 d). There were significant differences in the MRT among different habitats. It was shortest in the artificial larch forest at 7.67 ± 6.80 d (1-28 d). In contrast, the MRT in the broad-leaved forest was the longest at 17.52 ± 12.91 d (4-60 d). There were significant differences in the MRT between the artificial larch forest and the other habitats. There was less predation of the three types of seeds at the mixed-forest edge, and the most seeds were dispersed. The rates of predation of the , , and seeds were 28.33%, 15.83%, and 44.0%, and 59.17%, 84.17%, and 48.0% of the seeds were dispersed, respectively. The average dispersal distances of all the seeds were less than 6 m, and the longest distance recorded was 18.66 m. The dispersal distances and burial depths differed significantly among the four types of habitats. The distance of seed dispersal was primarily distributed in 1-6 m.

摘要

为了探究不同栖息地中啮齿动物对不同种子的贮藏策略差异,我们在中国东北温带森林中标记并释放了三种不同类型的种子,包括[种子类型1]、[种子类型2]和[种子类型3],并调查了种子在四种不同栖息地中的命运,这四种栖息地包括阔叶林、混交林边缘、混交林和人工落叶松林。我们的研究表明,啮齿动物的贮藏策略在不同栖息地中存在显著差异。不同栖息地种子的存活曲线呈现相同趋势,但不同栖息地的种子消耗率有所不同。在十天内,四个栖息地中超过50%的种子被消耗。消耗超过70%的种子需要20天。[种子类型1]的种子消耗率达到96.70%;[种子类型2]的种子有99.09%被消耗,[种子类型3]的种子有93.07%被消耗。人工落叶松林中的种子消耗最快。总体而言,大多数早期种子很快就被吃掉。20天后,消耗逐渐减少。啮齿动物在人工落叶松林中发现种子的平均时间比在其他类型森林中短。平均最早发现时间为1.4±0.9天(1 - 3天)。其他三个栖息地的平均最早发现时间均超过7天。种子的中位移除时间(MRT)分布在14.24±10.53天(1 - 60天)左右。不同栖息地的MRT存在显著差异。人工落叶松林中的MRT最短,为7.67±6.80天(1 - 28天)。相比之下,阔叶林中的MRT最长,为17.52±12.91天(4 - 60天)。人工落叶松林与其他栖息地的MRT存在显著差异。混交林边缘对这三种种子的捕食较少,种子扩散最多。[种子类型1]、[种子类型2]和[种子类型3]的种子捕食率分别为28.33%、15.83%和44.0%,种子扩散率分别为59.17%、84.17%和48.0%。所有种子的平均扩散距离均小于6米,记录到的最长距离为18.66米。四种栖息地类型的种子扩散距离和埋藏深度存在显著差异。种子扩散距离主要分布在1 - 6米之间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/f8b07a900345/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/725d49407bb4/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/828ce58e9ecd/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/27b0a0344917/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/f8b07a900345/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/725d49407bb4/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/828ce58e9ecd/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/27b0a0344917/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/78dc/10208085/f8b07a900345/zookeys-1141-169_article-96883__-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of habitat differences on the scatter-hoarding behaviour of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia) in temperate forests.栖息地差异对温带森林中啮齿动物(哺乳纲,啮齿目)分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2023 Jan 20;1141:169-183. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1141.96883. eCollection 2023.
2
Effects of season and food on the scatter-hoarding behavior of rodents in temperate forests of Northeast China.季节和食物对中国东北温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2021 Mar 18;1025:73-89. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1025.60972. eCollection 2021.
3
Food preference strategy of four sympatric rodents in a temperate forest in northeast China.中国东北温带森林中四种同域啮齿动物的食物偏好策略。
Zookeys. 2023 Apr 21;1158:163-177. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1158.96886. eCollection 2023.
4
[Impact of habitats on rodent-mediated seed fates of Quercus aliena var. acuteserrata.].[栖息地对锐齿槲栎啮齿动物介导的种子命运的影响。]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2019 Jul;30(7):2249-2256. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201907.004.
5
[Pinus koraiensis seed consumption by rodents and birds].[啮齿动物和鸟类对红松种子的消耗]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2008 Aug;19(8):1759-63.
6
[Effects of relative abundance of Quercus mongolica acorns on five tree species seed dispersal in Xiaoxing' an Mountains, Northeast China].[蒙古栎橡子相对丰度对中国东北小兴安岭五种树种种子扩散的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;24(6):1531-5.
7
Effects of thinning on scatter-hoarding by rodents in temperate forest.间伐对温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。
Integr Zool. 2016 May;11(3):182-90. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12184.
8
Contrasting patterns of short-term indirect seed-seed interactions mediated by scatter-hoarding rodents.由分散贮藏啮齿动物介导的短期间接种子-种子相互作用的对比模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Sep;85(5):1370-7. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12542. Epub 2016 May 31.
9
Trait-mediated seed predation, dispersal and survival among frugivore-dispersed plants in a fragmented subtropical forest, Southwest China.中国西南亚热带破碎化森林中食果动物传播植物的性状介导的种子捕食、传播和存活
Integr Zool. 2014 Jun;9(3):246-54. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12046.
10
Effects of seed traits and seed production on the seed predation and dispersal behavior of rodents.种子性状和种子产量对啮齿动物种子捕食和扩散行为的影响。
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2018 Dec;29(12):4181-4190. doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201812.033.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of season and food on the scatter-hoarding behavior of rodents in temperate forests of Northeast China.季节和食物对中国东北温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2021 Mar 18;1025:73-89. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1025.60972. eCollection 2021.
2
Observations of the foraging behavior and activity patterns of the Korean wood mouse, , in China, using infra-red cameras.利用红外相机对中国境内的大林姬鼠的觅食行为和活动模式进行观察。
Zookeys. 2020 Nov 12;992:139-155. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.992.57028. eCollection 2020.
3
Does risk of predation by mammalian predators affect the spacing behaviour of rodents? Two large-scale experiments.
哺乳动物捕食者的捕食风险会影响啮齿动物的空间行为吗?两项大规模实验。
Oecologia. 2000 Mar;122(4):487-492. doi: 10.1007/s004420050970.
4
Fruit Size Determines the Role of Three Scatter-Hoarding Rodents as Dispersers or Seed Predators of a Fleshy-Fruited Atacama Desert Shrub.果实大小决定了三种分散贮藏种子的啮齿动物作为一种肉质果实的阿塔卡马沙漠灌木的种子传播者或捕食者的角色。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166824. eCollection 2016.
5
Cultivated walnut trees showed earlier but not final advantage over its wild relatives in competing for seed dispersers.在争夺种子传播者方面,人工种植的核桃树比其野生同类表现出更早但并非最终的优势。
Integr Zool. 2017 Jan;12(1):12-25. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12242.
6
Fluctuation in seed abundance has contrasting effects on the fate of seeds from two rapidly germinating tree species in an Asian tropical forest.种子丰度的波动对亚洲热带森林中两种快速发芽的树种的种子命运有着截然不同的影响。
Integr Zool. 2017 Jan;12(1):2-11. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12213.
7
Seed fate and decision-making processes in scatter-hoarding rodents.散布型贮藏啮齿动物的种子命运和决策过程。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):474-504. doi: 10.1111/brv.12240. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
How plants manipulate the scatter-hoarding behaviour of seed-dispersing animals.植物如何操纵种子散布动物的撒播贮藏行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 27;365(1542):989-97. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0205.
9
Cache decision making: the effects of competition on cache decisions in Merriam's kangaroo rat (Dipodomys merriami).缓存决策:竞争对墨氏更格卢鼠(Dipodomys merriami)缓存决策的影响。
J Comp Psychol. 2005 May;119(2):187-96. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.187.