• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

季节和食物对中国东北温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。

Effects of season and food on the scatter-hoarding behavior of rodents in temperate forests of Northeast China.

作者信息

Li Dianwei, Liu Yang, Shan Hongjia, Li Na, Hao Jingwei, Yang Binbin, Peng Ting, Jin Zhimin

机构信息

College of Life Sciences and Technology, Mudanjiang Normal University, No. 191 Wenhua Road, Mudanjiang, Heilongjiang 157011, China Mudanjiang Normal University Mudanjiang China.

College of Wildlife and Protected Area, Northeast Forestry University, No. 26 Hexing Road, Harbin 150040, China Northeast Forestry University Harbin China.

出版信息

Zookeys. 2021 Mar 18;1025:73-89. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1025.60972. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3897/zookeys.1025.60972
PMID:33814946
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7997858/
Abstract

To explore the differences in hoarding strategies of rodents for different seeds in various seasons, we labeled and released the seeds of , , and in temperate forests of Northeast China and investigated the fate of the seeds in spring and autumn. The analysis showed that the hoarding strategies of the rodents varied substantially between seasons. The seeds were consumed faster in the spring than in the autumn. More than 50% of the seeds in the two seasons were consumed by the 16 day. It took 36 days to consume 75% of the seeds in the spring and 44 days in the autumn. The rate of consumption of the seeds in the spring was greater than in the autumn, and the rate of spread of the seeds was greater in the autumn. The distances of removal for the consumption and dispersal of seeds in the spring (3.26 ± 3.21 m and 4.15 ± 3.52 m, respectively) were both shorter than those in the autumn (3.74 ± 3.41 m and 4.87 ± 3.94 m, respectively). In addition, the fate of different seeds varied significantly owing to differences in hoarding strategies. The seeds of the three preferred species, , , and , were quickly consumed. More than 90% of the seeds of these species were consumed. Only 21% of seeds were slowly consumed, and the two seasons had the same seed consumption rate patterns: the consumption rate of seeds was the highest, followed by , then , and finally . The median removal times of the two seasons were different, but the rules were the same: was the shortest, followed by , and the third was . In both seasons, the most predated seeds were those of ; the most hoarded seeds were those of , and the most unconsumed seeds were those of .

摘要

为探究啮齿动物在不同季节对不同种子的贮藏策略差异,我们在中国东北温带森林中对[种子名称1]、[种子名称2]、[种子名称3]和[种子名称4]的种子进行标记并释放,调查了春秋两季种子的去向。分析表明,啮齿动物的贮藏策略在不同季节间有很大差异。种子在春季的消耗速度比秋季快。两个季节中超过50%的种子在16天内被消耗。春季消耗75%的种子需要36天,秋季则需要44天。种子在春季的消耗速度大于秋季,而种子的传播速度在秋季更快。春季种子用于消耗和扩散的搬运距离(分别为3.26±3.21米和4.15±3.52米)均短于秋季(分别为3.74±3.41米和4.87±3.94米)。此外,由于贮藏策略的差异,不同种子的去向有显著不同。三种偏好物种[种子名称5]、[种子名称6]和[种子名称7]的种子很快被消耗。这些物种超过90%的种子被消耗。只有21%的[种子名称8]种子被缓慢消耗,且两个季节的种子消耗速率模式相同:[种子名称8]种子的消耗速率最高,其次是[种子名称9],然后是[种子名称10],最后是[种子名称11]。两个季节的中位搬运时间不同,但规律相同:[种子名称12]最短,其次是[种子名称13],第三是[种子名称14]。在两个季节中,被捕食最多的[种子名称15]种子是[具体种子种类1]的;贮藏最多的种子是[具体种子种类2]的,未被消耗最多的种子是[具体种子种类3]的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/49522cb45ffa/zookeys-1025-073-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/b1abdb051da9/zookeys-1025-073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/9a3d57650503/zookeys-1025-073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/0fcbe14daa81/zookeys-1025-073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/6f69da2517f8/zookeys-1025-073-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/a2ea590f9240/zookeys-1025-073-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/49522cb45ffa/zookeys-1025-073-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/b1abdb051da9/zookeys-1025-073-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/9a3d57650503/zookeys-1025-073-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/0fcbe14daa81/zookeys-1025-073-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/6f69da2517f8/zookeys-1025-073-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/a2ea590f9240/zookeys-1025-073-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ec99/7997858/49522cb45ffa/zookeys-1025-073-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of season and food on the scatter-hoarding behavior of rodents in temperate forests of Northeast China.季节和食物对中国东北温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2021 Mar 18;1025:73-89. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1025.60972. eCollection 2021.
2
Effects of habitat differences on the scatter-hoarding behaviour of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia) in temperate forests.栖息地差异对温带森林中啮齿动物(哺乳纲,啮齿目)分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2023 Jan 20;1141:169-183. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1141.96883. eCollection 2023.
3
[Effects of relative abundance of Quercus mongolica acorns on five tree species seed dispersal in Xiaoxing' an Mountains, Northeast China].[蒙古栎橡子相对丰度对中国东北小兴安岭五种树种种子扩散的影响]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Jun;24(6):1531-5.
4
Food preference strategy of four sympatric rodents in a temperate forest in northeast China.中国东北温带森林中四种同域啮齿动物的食物偏好策略。
Zookeys. 2023 Apr 21;1158:163-177. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1158.96886. eCollection 2023.
5
[Seasonal variations of wild apricot seed dispersal and hoarding by rodents in rehabilitated land].[退耕还林地啮齿动物对山杏种子扩散与贮藏的季节变化]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2010 May;21(5):1238-43.
6
Seed trait-mediated selection by rodents affects mutualistic interactions and seedling recruitment of co-occurring tree species.啮齿动物通过种子性状介导的选择影响共生树种的互利共生相互作用和幼苗更新。
Oecologia. 2016 Feb;180(2):475-84. doi: 10.1007/s00442-015-3490-4. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
7
Contrasting patterns of short-term indirect seed-seed interactions mediated by scatter-hoarding rodents.由分散贮藏啮齿动物介导的短期间接种子-种子相互作用的对比模式。
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Sep;85(5):1370-7. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12542. Epub 2016 May 31.
8
[Predation and removal of rodents on the seeds with different size and pericarp traits].[不同大小和果皮特征种子上啮齿动物的捕食与清除]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2013 Aug;24(8):2325-32.
9
Effects of thinning on scatter-hoarding by rodents in temperate forest.间伐对温带森林中啮齿动物分散贮藏行为的影响。
Integr Zool. 2016 May;11(3):182-90. doi: 10.1111/1749-4877.12184.
10
Effects of Seed Size and Cache Density on the Seed Fate of Mediated by Rodents.种子大小和贮藏密度对啮齿动物介导的种子命运的影响。
Life (Basel). 2024 Feb 21;14(3):286. doi: 10.3390/life14030286.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic diversity and conservation of Siberian apricot (Prunus sibirica L.) based on microsatellite markers.基于微卫星标记的西伯利亚杏(Prunus sibirica L.)遗传多样性与保护。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 11;13(1):11245. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37993-2.
2
Effects of habitat differences on the scatter-hoarding behaviour of rodents (Mammalia, Rodentia) in temperate forests.栖息地差异对温带森林中啮齿动物(哺乳纲,啮齿目)分散贮藏行为的影响。
Zookeys. 2023 Jan 20;1141:169-183. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1141.96883. eCollection 2023.
3
Food preference strategy of four sympatric rodents in a temperate forest in northeast China.

本文引用的文献

1
Observations of the foraging behavior and activity patterns of the Korean wood mouse, , in China, using infra-red cameras.利用红外相机对中国境内的大林姬鼠的觅食行为和活动模式进行观察。
Zookeys. 2020 Nov 12;992:139-155. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.992.57028. eCollection 2020.
2
Ranging behaviour and time budgets of male wood mice Apodemus sylvaticus in different habitats and seasons.不同栖息地和季节中雄性林姬鼠(Apodemus sylvaticus)的活动范围行为和时间分配
Oecologia. 1997 Jan;109(2):242-250. doi: 10.1007/s004420050079.
3
Fruit Size Determines the Role of Three Scatter-Hoarding Rodents as Dispersers or Seed Predators of a Fleshy-Fruited Atacama Desert Shrub.
中国东北温带森林中四种同域啮齿动物的食物偏好策略。
Zookeys. 2023 Apr 21;1158:163-177. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.1158.96886. eCollection 2023.
果实大小决定了三种分散贮藏种子的啮齿动物作为一种肉质果实的阿塔卡马沙漠灌木的种子传播者或捕食者的角色。
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166824. eCollection 2016.
4
Seed fate and decision-making processes in scatter-hoarding rodents.散布型贮藏啮齿动物的种子命运和决策过程。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Feb;92(1):474-504. doi: 10.1111/brv.12240. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
5
Alternative strategies of seed predator escape by early-germinating oaks in Asia and North America.亚洲和北美的早发芽栎树通过替代策略逃避种子捕食者。
Ecol Evol. 2012 Mar;2(3):487-92. doi: 10.1002/ece3.209.
6
Effects of fat and protein levels on foraging preferences of tannin in scatter-hoarding rodents.脂肪和蛋白质水平对分散贮藏啮齿动物对单宁觅食偏好的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40640. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040640. Epub 2012 Jul 10.
7
Effects of burrow condition and seed handling time on hoarding strategies of Edward's long-tailed rat (Leopoldamys edwardsi).洞穴条件和种子处理时间对爱德华长尾大鼠(Leopoldamys edwardsi)贮藏策略的影响。
Behav Processes. 2010 Oct;85(2):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 14.
8
How plants manipulate the scatter-hoarding behaviour of seed-dispersing animals.植物如何操纵种子散布动物的撒播贮藏行为。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Mar 27;365(1542):989-97. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2009.0205.
9
Forest rodents provide directed dispersal of Jeffrey pine seeds.森林啮齿动物为杰弗里松种子提供定向传播。
Ecology. 2009 Mar;90(3):675-87. doi: 10.1890/07-0542.1.
10
Effectiveness of rodents as local seed dispersers of Holm oaks.啮齿动物作为栓皮栎本地种子传播者的有效性。
Oecologia. 2008 Mar;155(3):529-37. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0928-3. Epub 2007 Dec 14.