Paladino Antonella, Vitagliano Luigi, Graziano Giuseppe
Institute of Biostructures and Bioimaging, CNR, Via Pietro Castellino 111, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Department of Science and Technology, University of Sannio, via Francesco de Sanctis snc, 82100 Benevento, Italy.
Biology (Basel). 2023 May 22;12(5):754. doi: 10.3390/biology12050754.
Proteins perform their many functions by adopting either a minimal number of strictly similar conformations, the native state, or a vast ensemble of highly flexible conformations. In both cases, their structural features are highly influenced by the chemical environment. Even though a plethora of experimental studies have demonstrated the impact of chemical denaturants on protein structure, the molecular mechanism underlying their action is still debated. In the present review, after a brief recapitulation of the main experimental data on protein denaturants, we survey both classical and more recent interpretations of the molecular basis of their action. In particular, we highlight the differences and similarities of the impact that denaturants have on different structural classes of proteins, i.e., globular, intrinsically disordered (IDP), and amyloid-like assemblies. Particular attention has been given to the IDPs, as recent studies are unraveling their fundamental importance in many physiological processes. The role that computation techniques are expected to play in the near future is illustrated.
蛋白质通过采取数量有限的严格相似构象(即天然状态)或大量高度灵活的构象来执行其多种功能。在这两种情况下,它们的结构特征都受到化学环境的高度影响。尽管大量实验研究已经证明了化学变性剂对蛋白质结构的影响,但其作用的分子机制仍存在争议。在本综述中,在简要回顾了关于蛋白质变性剂的主要实验数据之后,我们考察了对其作用分子基础的经典和最新解释。特别是,我们强调了变性剂对不同结构类别的蛋白质(即球状蛋白、内在无序蛋白(IDP)和淀粉样蛋白样聚集体)影响的异同。由于最近的研究揭示了IDP在许多生理过程中的根本重要性,因此对其给予了特别关注。还阐述了计算技术在不久的将来有望发挥的作用。