Müller Günter A
Biology and Technology Studies Institute Munich (BITSIM), 80939 Munich, Germany.
Institute of Media Sociology, Department of Cultural Sciences, University of Paderborn, 33104 Paderborn, Germany.
Bioengineering (Basel). 2025 May 15;12(5):532. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering12050532.
So far, synthetic biology approaches for the construction of artificial microorganisms have fostered the transformation of acceptor cells with genomes from donor cells. However, this strategy seems to be limited to closely related bacterial species only, due to the need for a "fit" between donor and acceptor proteomes and structures. "Fitting" of cellular regulation of metabolite fluxes and turnover between donor and acceptor cells, i.e. cybernetic heredity, may be even more difficult to achieve. The bacterial transformation experiment design 1.0, as introduced by Frederick Griffith almost one century ago, may support integration of DNA, macromolecular, topological, cybernetic and cellular heredity: (i) attenuation of donor of (S) serotype fosters release of DNA, and hypothetically of non-DNA structures compatible with subsequent transfer to and transformation of acceptor from (R) to (S) serotype; (ii) use of intact donor cells rather than of subcellular or purified fractions may guarantee maximal diversity of the structural and cybernetic matter and information transferred; (iii) "Blending" or mixing and fusion of donor and acceptor may occur under accompanying transfer of metabolites and regulatory circuits. A Griffith transformation experiment design 2.0 is suggested, which may enable efficient exchange of DNA as well as non-DNA structural and cybernetic matter and information, leading to unicellular hybrid microorganisms with large morphological/metabolic phenotypic differences and major features compared to predeceding cells. The prerequisites of horizontal gene and somatic cell nuclear transfer, the molecular mechanism of transformation, the machineries for the biogenesis of bacterial cytoskeleton, micelle-like complexes and membrane landscapes are briefly reviewed on the basis of underlying conceptions, ranging from Darwin's "gemmules" to "stirps", cytoplasmic and "plasmon" inheritance, "rhizene agency", "communicology", "transdisciplinary membranology" to up to Kirschner's "facilitated variation".
到目前为止,用于构建人工微生物的合成生物学方法促进了受体细胞与供体细胞基因组的转化。然而,由于供体和受体蛋白质组及结构之间需要“匹配”,这种策略似乎仅限于密切相关的细菌物种。供体和受体细胞之间代谢物通量和周转的细胞调节“匹配”,即控制论遗传,可能更难实现。大约一个世纪前弗雷德里克·格里菲斯提出的细菌转化实验设计1.0,可能支持DNA、大分子、拓扑、控制论和细胞遗传的整合:(i) (S)血清型供体的减毒促进DNA的释放,以及假设的与随后从(R)血清型转移到受体并转化为(S)血清型兼容的非DNA结构的释放;(ii) 使用完整的供体细胞而不是亚细胞或纯化组分,可以保证所转移的结构和控制论物质及信息的最大多样性;(iii) 供体和受体细胞的“混合”或混合与融合可能在代谢物和调节回路的伴随转移下发生。本文提出了格里菲斯转化实验设计2.0,它可能实现DNA以及非DNA结构和控制论物质及信息的有效交换,从而产生与先前细胞相比具有大的形态/代谢表型差异和主要特征的单细胞杂交微生物。基于从达尔文的“微芽”到“谱系”、细胞质和“种质”遗传、“根原作用”、“通信学”、“跨学科膜学”到基尔希纳的“促进变异”等基本概念,简要回顾了水平基因转移和体细胞核移植的前提条件、转化的分子机制、细菌细胞骨架、胶束样复合物和膜景观生物发生的机制。