Terry Stephanie A, Krüger Ana M, Lima Paulo M T, Gruninger Robert J, Abbott D Wade, Beauchemin Karen A
Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lethbridge, AB T1J 3B6, Canada.
Centro de Energia Nuclear na Agricultura, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 13400-970, Brazil.
Animals (Basel). 2023 May 15;13(10):1643. doi: 10.3390/ani13101643.
Several red seaweeds have been shown to inhibit enteric CH4 production; however, the adaptation of fermentation parameters to their presence is not well understood. The objective of this study was to examine the effect of three red seaweeds (, , and ) on in vitro fermentation, CH4 production, and adaptation using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC). The experiment was conducted as a completely randomized design with four treatments, duplicated in two identical RUSITEC apparatus equipped with eight fermenter vessels each. The four treatments included the control and the three red seaweeds added to the control diet at 2% diet DM. The experimental period was divided into four phases including a baseline phase (d 0-7; no seaweed included), an adaptation phase (d 8-11; seaweed included in treatment vessels), an intermediate phase (d 12-16), and a stable phase (d 17-21). The degradability of organic matter ( = 0.04) and neutral detergent fibre ( = 0.05) was decreased by during the adaptation phase, but returned to control levels in the stable phase. supplementation resulted in a decrease ( < 0.001) in the molar proportions of acetate, propionate, and total volatile fatty acid (VFA) production, with an increase in the molar proportions of butyrate, caproate, and valerate; the other seaweeds had no effect ( > 0.05) on the molar proportions or production of individual VFA. was the only seaweed to suppress CH4 production ( < 0.001), with the suppressive effect increasing ( < 0.001) across phases. Similarly, increased ( < 0.001) the production of hydrogen (H2, %, mL/d) across the adaptation, intermediate, and stable phases, with the intermediate and stable phases having greater H2 production than the adaptation phase. In conclusion, and did not impact rumen fermentation or inhibit CH4 production within the RUSITEC. In contrast, we conclude that is an effective CH4 inhibitor and its introduction to the ruminal environment requires a period of adaptation; however, the large magnitude of CH4 suppression by inhibits VFA synthesis, which may restrict the production performance in vivo.
几种红藻已被证明能抑制肠道甲烷的产生;然而,发酵参数对其存在的适应性尚不清楚。本研究的目的是使用瘤胃模拟技术(RUSITEC)研究三种红藻(、和)对体外发酵、甲烷产生和适应性的影响。实验采用完全随机设计,有四种处理,在两个配备八个发酵罐的相同RUSITEC装置中重复进行。四种处理包括对照组和在对照日粮中添加2%日粮干物质的三种红藻。实验期分为四个阶段,包括基线期(第0 - 7天;不包括红藻)、适应期(第8 - 11天;处理罐中包括红藻)、中间期(第12 - 16天)和稳定期(第17 - 21天)。在适应期,添加后有机物质( = 0.04)和中性洗涤纤维( = 0.05)的降解率降低,但在稳定期恢复到对照水平。添加导致乙酸、丙酸和总挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)产生的摩尔比例降低( < 0.001),同时丁酸、己酸和戊酸的摩尔比例增加;其他红藻对单个VFA的摩尔比例或产生没有影响( > 0.05)。是唯一能抑制甲烷产生的红藻( < 0.001),且抑制作用在各阶段逐渐增强( < 0.001)。同样,在适应期、中间期和稳定期,添加使氢气(H2,%,mL/d)的产生增加( < 0.001),中间期和稳定期的氢气产生量高于适应期。总之,和在RUSITEC内不影响瘤胃发酵或抑制甲烷产生。相比之下,我们得出结论,是一种有效的甲烷抑制剂,将其引入瘤胃环境需要一段时间的适应;然而,对甲烷的大量抑制会抑制VFA合成,这可能会限制体内的生产性能。