Suppr超能文献

新生儿生存极限护理中的伦理困境

Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability.

作者信息

Kornhauser Cerar Lilijana, Lucovnik Miha

机构信息

Department of Perinatology, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Zaloska 11, 1525 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Vrazov Trg 2, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;10(5):784. doi: 10.3390/children10050784.

Abstract

Advances in neonatal care have pushed the limit of viability to incrementally lower gestations over the last decades. However, surviving extremely premature neonates are prone to long-term neurodevelopmental handicaps. This makes ethics a crucial dimension of periviable birth management. At 22 weeks, survival ranges from 1 to 15%, and profound disabilities in survivors are common. Consequently, there is no beneficence-based obligation to offer any aggressive perinatal management. At 23 weeks, survival ranges from 8 to 54%, and survival without severe handicap ranges from 7 to 23%. If fetal indication for cesarean delivery appears, the procedure may be offered when neonatal resuscitation is planned. At a gestational age ≥24 weeks, up to 51% neonates are expected to survive the neonatal period. Survival without profound neurologic disability ranges from 12 to 38%. Beneficence-based obligation to intervene is reasonable at these gestations. Nevertheless, autonomy of parents should also be respected, and parental consent should be sought prior to any intervention. Optimal counselling of parents involves harmonized cooperation of obstetric and neonatal care providers. Every fetus/neonate and every pregnant woman are different and have the right to be considered individually when treatment decisions are being made.

摘要

在过去几十年里,新生儿护理的进步已将存活极限逐步降低至更小孕周。然而,存活下来的极早产儿容易出现长期神经发育障碍。这使得伦理成为可存活孕周边缘出生管理的关键维度。在孕22周时,存活率为1%至15%,幸存者中出现严重残疾很常见。因此,没有基于行善原则的义务提供任何积极的围产期管理。在孕23周时,存活率为8%至54%,无严重残疾的存活率为7%至23%。如果出现剖宫产的胎儿指征,在计划进行新生儿复苏时可实施该手术。在孕龄≥24周时,预计高达51%的新生儿可度过新生儿期。无严重神经残疾的存活率为12%至38%。在这些孕周基于行善原则进行干预是合理的。然而,也应尊重父母的自主权,在进行任何干预之前应征求父母同意。对父母进行最佳咨询需要产科和新生儿护理人员的协调合作。每个胎儿/新生儿和每位孕妇都是不同的,在做出治疗决策时有权得到个体化考虑。

相似文献

1
Ethical Dilemmas in Neonatal Care at the Limit of Viability.新生儿生存极限护理中的伦理困境
Children (Basel). 2023 Apr 26;10(5):784. doi: 10.3390/children10050784.
4
Intention to treat: obstetrical management at the threshold of viability.意向治疗:极早产儿分娩时机的产科处理。
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2020 May;2(2):100096. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2020.100096. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
7
Ethical issues in periviable birth.极早产儿分娩中的伦理问题。
Semin Perinatol. 2013 Dec;37(6):422-5. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.06.027.
10
Limits of viability: definition of the gray zone.生存极限:灰色地带的定义
J Perinatol. 2008 May;28 Suppl 1:S4-8. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.42.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
The limits of viability of extremely preterm infants.极早产儿的存活极限
Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2022 May 5;35(5):731-735. doi: 10.1080/08998280.2022.2071073. eCollection 2022.
6
In the grey zone-survival and morbidities of periviable births.极早产儿的灰色地带:生存与病态。
J Perinatol. 2022 Aug;42(8):1001-1007. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01355-z. Epub 2022 Mar 10.
9
Whom are we seeking to protect? Extremely preterm babies and moral distress.我们试图保护谁?极早产儿与道德困境。
Semin Perinatol. 2022 Mar;46(2):151549. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2021.151549. Epub 2021 Nov 11.
10
Moral Distress in Neonatology.新生儿科的道德困境。
Pediatrics. 2021 Aug;148(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2020-031864. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验