• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用社交机器人为老年人举办工作坊中的研究参与者选择偏差及其对人口代表性的影响。

Research Participant Selection Bias in the Workshop Using Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults and Its Effect on Population Representativeness.

机构信息

Department of Human and Engineered Environmental Studies, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwanoha 5-1-5, Chiba 277-8563, Japan.

Faculty of Service Management, Bunri University of Hospitality, 311-1, Kashiwabara-shinden, Sainatama 350-1336, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 22;20(10):5915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105915.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph20105915
PMID:37239641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10218669/
Abstract

Every research participant has their own personality characteristics. For example, older adults assisted by socially assistive robots (SAR) may have their own unique characteristics and may not be representative of the general population of older adults. In this research, we compared the average personality characteristics of participants in a workshop on robotics recruited directly through posting with those of older Japanese adults to examine participant selection bias and group representativeness for future study of SARs. After a one-week recruitment period, the workshop was attended by 20 older participants (nine males and 11 females) aged between 62 and 86 years. Extroversion among workshop participants was 4.38, 0.40 higher than the average for older adults in Japan. The workshop participants' openness was 4.55, 1.09 higher than the average for the Japanese elderly. Thus, the results indicate a slight selection bias in the personal characteristics of the participants depending on the recruitment method when compared to the Japan national average for older adults. In addition, only one of 20 participants was below the cutoff on the LSNS-6 score and considered to have a tendency toward social isolation. The development and introduction of socially assistive robots is often being considered to support people in social isolation in their daily lives; however, the results of this study showed that it is difficult to recruit people who tend to be socially isolated when gathering research participants by methods such as posting. Therefore, the effectiveness of the method of recruiting participants should be carefully verified in research regarding socially assistive robots.

摘要

每位研究参与者都有其独特的个性特征。例如,使用社交辅助机器人(SAR)的老年人可能具有自己独特的特征,而这些特征可能无法代表老年人的一般群体。在这项研究中,我们比较了通过张贴方式直接招募的机器人研讨会参与者的平均人格特征与日本老年人的平均特征,以检查参与者选择偏差和 SAR 未来研究的群体代表性。经过一周的招募期,有 20 名老年人参加了研讨会(男性 9 名,女性 11 名),年龄在 62 岁至 86 岁之间。与会者的外向性得分为 4.38,比日本老年人的平均水平高 0.40。研讨会参与者的开放性得分为 4.55,比日本老年人的平均水平高 1.09。因此,与日本老年人的全国平均水平相比,根据招募方法,参与者的个人特征存在轻微的选择偏差。此外,在 20 名参与者中,只有 1 名参与者的 LSNS-6 得分低于截定点,被认为有社交孤立的倾向。社交辅助机器人的开发和引入通常被认为是为了支持日常生活中社交孤立的人;然而,这项研究的结果表明,当通过张贴等方式招募研究参与者时,很难招募到那些有社交孤立倾向的人。因此,在社交辅助机器人相关研究中,应仔细验证参与者招募方法的有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/3c753b740995/ijerph-20-05915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/495654218bc0/ijerph-20-05915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/6bae112caff5/ijerph-20-05915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/3c753b740995/ijerph-20-05915-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/495654218bc0/ijerph-20-05915-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/6bae112caff5/ijerph-20-05915-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fb7b/10218669/3c753b740995/ijerph-20-05915-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Research Participant Selection Bias in the Workshop Using Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults and Its Effect on Population Representativeness.利用社交机器人为老年人举办工作坊中的研究参与者选择偏差及其对人口代表性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 22;20(10):5915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105915.
2
Exploring the Use of Socially Assistive Robots Among Socially Isolated Korean American Older Adults.探索社交隔离的韩裔美国老年人使用社交辅助机器人的情况。
J Appl Gerontol. 2024 Sep;43(9):1295-1304. doi: 10.1177/07334648241236081. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
3
Positive Emotional Responses to Socially Assistive Robots in People With Dementia: Pilot Study.《痴呆症患者对社交辅助机器人的积极情绪反应:初步研究》
JMIR Aging. 2024 Apr 11;7:e52443. doi: 10.2196/52443.
4
Acceptance and Attitudes Toward a Human-like Socially Assistive Robot by Older Adults.老年人对类人社交辅助机器人的接受度和态度
Assist Technol. 2014 Fall;26(3):140-50. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2013.869703.
5
Eliciting a User's Preferences by the Self-Disclosure of Socially Assistive Robots in Local Households of Older Adults to Facilitate Verbal Human-Robot Interaction.通过在老年人的本地家庭中自我披露社会辅助机器人来引出用户的偏好,以促进口头人机交互。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 8;19(18):11319. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811319.
6
Socially facilitative robots for older adults to alleviate social isolation: A participatory design workshop approach in the US and Japan.用于缓解老年人社会隔离的社交促进型机器人:美国和日本的参与式设计工作坊方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:904019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019. eCollection 2022.
7
Enablers and barriers to the implementation of socially assistive humanoid robots in health and social care: a systematic review.促进和阻碍社交辅助人形机器人在医疗和社会保健领域应用的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jan 9;10(1):e033096. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033096.
8
Socially Assistive Humanoid Robots: Effects on Depression and Health-Related Quality of Life among Low-Income, Socially Isolated Older Adults in South Korea.社交辅助类人机器人:对韩国低收入、社会孤立老年人的抑郁及健康相关生活质量的影响
J Appl Gerontol. 2023 Mar;42(3):367-375. doi: 10.1177/07334648221138283. Epub 2022 Nov 3.
9
A qualitative exploration of care homes workers' views and training needs in relation to the use of socially assistive humanoid robots in their workplace.对养老院工作人员关于在其工作场所使用社交辅助类人机器人的看法和培训需求的定性探索。
Int J Older People Nurs. 2022 May;17(3):e12432. doi: 10.1111/opn.12432. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
10
Exploring the impact of socially assistive robots on health and wellbeing across the lifespan: An umbrella review and meta-analysis.探讨社交辅助机器人在整个生命周期中对健康和幸福的影响:伞式综述和荟萃分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2024 May;153:104730. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104730. Epub 2024 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
AI Applications to Reduce Loneliness Among Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Effectiveness and Technologies.人工智能应用于减少老年人孤独感:有效性与技术的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 20;13(5):446. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13050446.

本文引用的文献

1
Social Robots for Depression in Older Adults: A Systematic Review.社交机器人在老年人抑郁症中的应用:系统评价。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2018 Nov;50(6):612-622. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12423. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
2
Social Robots for People with Aging and Dementia: A Systematic Review of Literature.面向老年人和痴呆症患者的社交机器人:文献系统综述
Telemed J E Health. 2019 Jul;25(7):533-540. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2018.0051. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
3
Validation of an abbreviated version of the Lubben Social Network Scale ("LSNS-6") and its associations with suicidality among older adults in China.
验证简化版卢本社会网络量表(“LSNS-6”)在中国老年人中的适用性及其与自杀倾向的关系。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 2;13(8):e0201612. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201612. eCollection 2018.
4
[Normative data of middle-aged and older Japanese adults for the the Japanese version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)].[日本版十项人格量表(TIPI-J)的日本中老年成年人常模数据]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(7):356-363. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.7_356.
5
How do older adults experience and perceive socially assistive robots in aged care: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.老年人在老年护理中体验和感知社交辅助机器人的方式:定性证据的系统评价。
Aging Ment Health. 2018 Feb;22(2):149-167. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2017.1286455. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
[Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the abbreviated Lubben Social Network Scale].[日语版简化版鲁本社会网络量表的信度与效度]
Nihon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi. 2011;48(2):149-57. doi: 10.3143/geriatrics.48.149.
7
Population reach and recruitment bias in a maintenance RCT in physically active older adults.在积极运动的老年人群体中维持 RCT 的研究人群覆盖和招募偏差。
J Phys Act Health. 2010 Jan;7(1):127-35. doi: 10.1123/jpah.7.1.127.
8
Creating and undermining social support in communal relationships: the role of compassionate and self-image goals.在群体关系中建立和破坏社会支持:同情目标和自我形象目标的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2008 Sep;95(3):555-75. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.555.
9
Self-regulation and personality: how interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior.自我调节与人格:干预措施如何提高调节成功率,以及损耗如何调节特质对行为的影响。
J Pers. 2006 Dec;74(6):1773-801. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00428.x.
10
Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers.跨工具和观察者的人格五因素模型的验证
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1987 Jan;52(1):81-90. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.52.1.81.