• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于缓解老年人社会隔离的社交促进型机器人:美国和日本的参与式设计工作坊方法。

Socially facilitative robots for older adults to alleviate social isolation: A participatory design workshop approach in the US and Japan.

作者信息

Fraune Marlena R, Komatsu Takanori, Preusse Harrison R, Langlois Danielle K, Au Rachel H Y, Ling Katrina, Suda Shogo, Nakamura Kiko, Tsui Katherine M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM, United States.

Department of Frontier Media Science, Meiji University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:904019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019
PMID:36337527
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9629871/
Abstract

Social technology can improve the quality of older adults' social lives and mitigate negative mental and physical health outcomes associated with loneliness, but it should be designed collaboratively with this population. In this paper, we used participatory design (PD) methods to investigate how robots might be used as social facilitators for middle-aged and older adults (age 50+) in both the US and Japan. We conducted PD workshops in the US and Japan because both countries are concerned about the social isolation of these older adults due to their rapidly aging populations. We developed a novel approach to participatory design of future technologies that spends 2/3 of the PD session asking participants about their own life experiences as a foundation. This grounds the conversation in reality, creates rapport among the participants, and engages them in creative critical thinking. Then, we build upon this foundation, pose an abstract topic, and ask participants to brainstorm on the topic based on their previous discussion. In both countries, participants were eager to actively discuss design ideas for socially facilitative robots and imagine how they might improve their social lives. US participants suggested design ideas for telepresence robots, social distancing robots, and social skills artificial intelligence programs, while Japanese participants suggested ideas for pet robots, robots for sharing experiences, and easy-to-operate instructor robots. Comparing these two countries, we found that US participants saw robots as tools to help facilitate their social connections, while Japanese participants envisioned robots to function as surrogate companions for their parents and distract them from loneliness when they were unavailable. With this paper, we contribute to the literature in two main ways, presenting: (1) A novel approach to participatory design of future technologies that grounds participants in their everyday experience, and (2) Results of the study indicating how middle-aged and older adults from the US and Japan wanted technologies to improve their social lives. Although we conducted the workshops during the COVID-19 pandemic, many findings generalized to other situations related to social isolation, such as older adults living alone.

摘要

社交技术可以改善老年人的社交生活质量,并减轻与孤独相关的负面身心健康后果,但它应该与这一群体合作设计。在本文中,我们使用参与式设计(PD)方法来研究机器人如何在美国和日本用作中年及老年人(50岁以上)的社交促进工具。我们在美国和日本举办了PD研讨会,因为这两个国家都担心这些老年人由于人口迅速老龄化而面临社会孤立问题。我们开发了一种未来技术参与式设计的新方法,在PD会议的三分之二时间里让参与者讲述自己的生活经历作为基础。这使对话基于现实,在参与者之间建立融洽关系,并促使他们进行创造性的批判性思考。然后,我们在此基础上提出一个抽象主题,并要求参与者根据之前的讨论就该主题进行头脑风暴。在这两个国家,参与者都渴望积极讨论社交促进机器人的设计想法,并想象它们如何改善自己的社交生活。美国参与者提出了远程呈现机器人、社交距离机器人和社交技能人工智能程序的设计想法,而日本参与者则提出了宠物机器人、共享体验机器人和易于操作的指导机器人的想法。比较这两个国家,我们发现美国参与者将机器人视为帮助促进社交联系的工具,而日本参与者则设想机器人充当他们父母的替代伴侣,在他们无法陪伴时使父母摆脱孤独。通过本文,我们主要在两个方面为文献做出了贡献:(1)一种将参与者置于日常体验中的未来技术参与式设计新方法;(2)研究结果表明美国和日本的中年及老年人希望技术如何改善他们的社交生活。尽管我们是在新冠疫情期间举办的研讨会,但许多研究结果适用于与社会孤立相关的其他情况,比如独居的老年人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/3ef95b61c62a/fpsyg-13-904019-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/51562fb0b69d/fpsyg-13-904019-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/2c06441e4b48/fpsyg-13-904019-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/a2be6cf39b1d/fpsyg-13-904019-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/7e785dafc36e/fpsyg-13-904019-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/8f2e94e8a1af/fpsyg-13-904019-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/b17ea9d21514/fpsyg-13-904019-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/3559d7d66edc/fpsyg-13-904019-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/3ef95b61c62a/fpsyg-13-904019-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/51562fb0b69d/fpsyg-13-904019-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/2c06441e4b48/fpsyg-13-904019-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/a2be6cf39b1d/fpsyg-13-904019-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/7e785dafc36e/fpsyg-13-904019-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/8f2e94e8a1af/fpsyg-13-904019-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/b17ea9d21514/fpsyg-13-904019-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/3559d7d66edc/fpsyg-13-904019-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b29/9629871/3ef95b61c62a/fpsyg-13-904019-g0008.jpg

相似文献

1
Socially facilitative robots for older adults to alleviate social isolation: A participatory design workshop approach in the US and Japan.用于缓解老年人社会隔离的社交促进型机器人:美国和日本的参与式设计工作坊方法。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 19;13:904019. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.904019. eCollection 2022.
2
How did COVID-19 pandemic affect the older adults' needs for robot technologies in Japan?: comparison of participatory design workshops during after the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情如何影响日本老年人对机器人技术的需求?:新冠疫情期间及之后参与式设计工作坊的比较
Front Robot AI. 2024 Jun 4;11:1363243. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243. eCollection 2024.
3
Recommendations for designing conversational companion robots with older adults through foundation models.通过基础模型与老年人设计对话式陪伴机器人的建议。
Front Robot AI. 2024 May 27;11:1363713. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363713. eCollection 2024.
4
Improving the Social Well-Being of Single Older Adults Using the LOVOT Social Robot: Qualitative Phenomenological Study.利用 LOVOT 社交机器人提高单身老年人的社会幸福感:定性现象学研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Aug 23;11:e56669. doi: 10.2196/56669.
5
Research Participant Selection Bias in the Workshop Using Socially Assistive Robots for Older Adults and Its Effect on Population Representativeness.利用社交机器人为老年人举办工作坊中的研究参与者选择偏差及其对人口代表性的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 May 22;20(10):5915. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20105915.
6
The perceptions of university students on technological and ethical risks of using robots in long-term care homes.大学生对在长期护理机构使用机器人的技术和伦理风险的认知。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Dec 21;10:1268386. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1268386. eCollection 2023.
7
Dignity, Autonomy, and Style of Company: Dimensions Older Adults Consider for Robot Companions.尊严、自主性与陪伴风格:老年人对机器人伴侣的考量维度
Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2021 Apr;5. doi: 10.1145/3449178.
8
Finding : How robots can support meaning in later life.研究发现:机器人如何在晚年生活中提供意义支持。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Oct 24;9:1011327. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1011327. eCollection 2022.
9
Practices of Care in Participatory Design With Older Adults During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Digitally Mediated Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间与老年人共同设计中的关怀实践:数字化中介研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jul 17;25:e45750. doi: 10.2196/45750.
10
Technology Acceptance of a Social Robot (LOVOT) Among Single Older Adults in Hong Kong and Singapore: Protocol for a Multimethod Study.香港和新加坡单身老年人对社交机器人(乐沃)的技术接受度:一项多方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Aug 17;12:e48618. doi: 10.2196/48618.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement of Older Adults in the Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Systems for Aging: A Scoping Review.老年人参与人工智能老龄化系统的设计、实施和评估:一项范围综述。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2025 Apr 7;80(5). doi: 10.1093/gerona/glaf024.
2
How did COVID-19 pandemic affect the older adults' needs for robot technologies in Japan?: comparison of participatory design workshops during after the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情如何影响日本老年人对机器人技术的需求?:新冠疫情期间及之后参与式设计工作坊的比较
Front Robot AI. 2024 Jun 4;11:1363243. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243. eCollection 2024.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Acceptance of care technologies to support activities of daily living by middle-aged and older adults in Japan: A cross-sectional study.日本中老年人对支持日常生活活动的护理技术的接受度:一项横断面研究。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Sep 8;3:100042. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100042. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
COVID surveillance robot: Monitoring social distancing constraints in indoor scenarios.新冠病毒监测机器人:监测室内场景中的社交距离限制。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 1;16(12):e0259713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259713. eCollection 2021.
3
Social Telepresence Robots: A Narrative Review of Experiments Involving Older Adults before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Promising directions for human-robot interactions defined by older adults.
老年人定义的人机交互的前景方向。
Front Robot AI. 2024 Apr 24;11:1289414. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2024.1289414. eCollection 2024.
4
Qualitative study on domestic social robot adoption and associated security concerns among older adults in Slovenia.斯洛文尼亚老年人对家用社交机器人的接受情况及相关安全问题的定性研究。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 25;15:1343077. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1343077. eCollection 2024.
5
Editorial: Social human-robot interaction (sHRI) of human-care service robots.社论:人类护理服务机器人的社会人机交互(sHRI)
Front Robot AI. 2022 Dec 6;9:1064440. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.1064440. eCollection 2022.
社交型远程临场机器人:一项关于新冠疫情前后涉及老年人的实验的叙述性综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 30;18(7):3597. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073597.
4
Befriending Older Adults in Nursing Homes: Volunteer Perceptions of Switching to Remote Befriending in the COVID-19 Era.在养老院与老年人交朋友:志愿者对在新冠疫情时代转向远程交友的看法。
Clin Gerontol. 2021 Jul-Sep;44(4):430-438. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2020.1868646. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
5
How does age affect personal and social reactions to COVID-19: Results from the national Understanding America Study.年龄如何影响个人和社会对 COVID-19 的反应:来自全国理解美国研究的结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 10;15(11):e0241950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241950. eCollection 2020.
6
The Psychological and Social Impact of Covid-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being.新冠疫情的心理和社会影响:幸福安康的新视角
Front Psychol. 2020 Oct 2;11:577684. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.577684. eCollection 2020.
7
Digital technology use and depressive symptoms among older adults in Korea: beneficial for those who have fewer social interactions?数字技术使用与韩国老年人的抑郁症状:对社交互动较少者有益?
Aging Ment Health. 2021 Oct;25(10):1839-1847. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2020.1839863. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
8
Mental health in times of COVID: Thoughts after the state of alarm.新冠疫情下的心理健康:警报解除后的思考
Med Clin (Engl Ed). 2020 Nov 13;155(9):392-394. doi: 10.1016/j.medcle.2020.07.007. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
9
COVID-19 exit strategy: Transitioning towards a new normal.新冠疫情退出策略:向新常态过渡。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2020 Nov;59:165-170. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2020.09.046. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
10
Timing of State and Territorial COVID-19 Stay-at-Home Orders and Changes in Population Movement - United States, March 1-May 31, 2020.美国 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 5 月 31 日各州和领地新冠疫情“居家令”发布时间及人口流动变化情况
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Sep 4;69(35):1198-1203. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6935a2.