Gil-González Irene, Pérez-San-Gregorio María Ángeles, Funuyet-Salas Jesús, Conrad Rupert, Martín-Rodríguez Agustín
Department of Personality, Assessment, and Psychological Treatment, University of Seville, 41018 Seville, Spain.
Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 11;11(10):1390. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101390.
We investigated the influence of post-traumatic growth (PTG) and mental health (MH) on multiple sclerosis (MS) caregivers' uses of coping strategies and identified biopsychosocial predictors of proactive or reactive coping. The Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28), Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PGI-21), Brief COPE Questionnaire (COPE-28), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) were used to evaluate 209 caregivers. Higher PTG was related to greater use of emotional support, positive reframing, religion, active coping, instrumental support, planning, denial, self-distraction, self-blaming, and venting. Better MH was associated with greater use of acceptance, while behavioral disengagement and self-distraction were associated with poorer MH. The PTG dimensions relating to others and new possibilities, SF-12 dimensions of physical and emotional roles as well as partnership, not living with the patient, and significant others' social support were predictors of proactive coping. Reactive coping was positively predicted by the PTG dimension relating to others, depression, vitality, other than partner relation, and physical role, and negatively predicted by mental health level and emotional role. In summary, higher MH was associated with proactive coping strategies, whereas post-traumatic growth was related to the use of a wide range of proactive coping as well as reactive coping strategies.
我们调查了创伤后成长(PTG)和心理健康(MH)对多发性硬化症(MS)照料者应对策略使用的影响,并确定了积极应对或消极应对的生物心理社会预测因素。使用简短健康调查问卷(SF - 12)、一般健康问卷(GHQ - 28)、创伤后成长量表(PGI - 21)、简易应对方式问卷(COPE - 28)和领悟社会支持量表(MSPSS)对209名照料者进行评估。较高的PTG与更多地使用情感支持、积极重新评价、宗教、积极应对、工具性支持、计划、否认、自我分心、自我责备和宣泄有关。较好的MH与更多地使用接受有关,而行为脱离和自我分心与较差的MH有关。与他人和新可能性相关的PTG维度、SF - 12中身体和情感角色以及伴侣关系维度、不与患者同住以及重要他人的社会支持是积极应对的预测因素。消极应对由与他人相关的PTG维度、抑郁、活力、非伴侣关系和身体角色正向预测,由心理健康水平和情感角色负向预测。总之,较高的MH与积极应对策略相关,而创伤后成长与广泛使用积极应对以及消极应对策略有关。