• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准预防措施依从性工具的评估:使用COSMIN方法的系统评价

Evaluation of Standard Precautions Compliance Instruments: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology.

作者信息

Lommi Marzia, De Benedictis Anna, Porcelli Barbara, Raffaele Barbara, Latina Roberto, Montini Graziella, Tolentino Diaz Maria Ymelda, Guarente Luca, De Maria Maddalena, Ricci Simona, Giovanniello Dominique, Rocco Gennaro, Stievano Alessandro, Sabatino Laura, Notarnicola Ippolito, Gualandi Raffaella, Tartaglini Daniela, Ivziku Dhurata

机构信息

UOC Care to the Person, Local Health Authority Roma 2, 00159 Rome, Italy.

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 12;11(10):1408. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101408.

DOI:10.3390/healthcare11101408
PMID:37239700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10217811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Standard precautions (SPs) are first-line strategies with a dual goal: to protect health care workers from occupational contamination while providing care to infected patients and to prevent/reduce health care-associated infections (HAIs). This study aimed at (1) identifying the instruments currently available for measuring healthcare professionals' compliance with standard precautions; (2) evaluating their measurement properties; and (3) providing sound evidence for instrument selection for use by researchers, teachers, staff trainers, and clinical tutors.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic review to examine the psychometric properties of standard precautions self-assessment instruments in conformity with the COSMIN guidelines. The search was conducted on the databases PubMed, CINAHL, and APA PsycInfo.

RESULTS

Thirteen instruments were identified. These were classified into four categories of tools assessing: compliance with universal precautions, adherence to standard precautions, compliance with hand hygiene, and adherence to transmission-based guidelines and precautions. The psychometric properties of instruments and methodological approaches of the included studies were often not satisfactory. Only four instruments were classified as high-quality measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

The available instruments that measure healthcare professionals' compliance with standard precautions are of low-moderate quality. It is necessary that future research completes the validation processes undertaken for long-established and newly developed instruments, using higher-quality methods and estimating all psychometric properties.

摘要

背景

标准预防措施(SPs)是一线策略,具有双重目标:在为感染患者提供护理时保护医护人员免受职业污染,并预防/减少医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)。本研究旨在:(1)确定目前可用于衡量医护人员对标准预防措施依从性的工具;(2)评估其测量特性;(3)为研究人员、教师、员工培训师和临床导师选择使用的工具提供可靠证据。

方法

我们进行了一项系统评价,以根据COSMIN指南检查标准预防措施自我评估工具的心理测量特性。在PubMed、CINAHL和APA PsycInfo数据库上进行了检索。

结果

识别出13种工具。这些工具分为四类,分别评估:对普遍预防措施的依从性、对标准预防措施的遵守情况、对手卫生的依从性以及对基于传播的指南和预防措施的遵守情况。所纳入研究的工具的心理测量特性和方法学方法往往不尽人意。只有四种工具被归类为高质量测量。

结论

现有的衡量医护人员对标准预防措施依从性的工具质量中等偏低。未来的研究有必要使用更高质量的方法并估计所有心理测量特性,完成对既定工具和新开发工具的验证过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c58/10217811/c0acb10a756b/healthcare-11-01408-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c58/10217811/c0acb10a756b/healthcare-11-01408-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c58/10217811/c0acb10a756b/healthcare-11-01408-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of Standard Precautions Compliance Instruments: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology.标准预防措施依从性工具的评估:使用COSMIN方法的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 May 12;11(10):1408. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11101408.
2
The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.医疗机构内协作的测量:对测量工具属性的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):138-97. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-2159.
3
Appraisal and Evaluation of the Learning Environment Instruments of the Student Nurse: A Systematic Review Using COSMIN Methodology.护生学习环境评估工具的评价与评估:使用COSMIN方法的系统评价
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Apr 5;11(7):1043. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11071043.
4
Instruments for evaluating compliance with infection control practices and factors that affect it: an integrative review.评估感染控制措施依从性及其影响因素的工具:一项综合综述。
J Clin Nurs. 2014 Jun;23(11-12):1502-19. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12316. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
5
Instruments used to measure dating violence: A systematic review of psychometric properties.用于测量约会暴力的工具:心理测量特性的系统评价
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Apr;79(4):1267-1289. doi: 10.1111/jan.15374. Epub 2022 Jul 24.
6
Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: A systematic review of measurement properties.评估成年接受治疗者药物知识的工具:测量特性的系统评价。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2021 Jan;113:103785. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103785. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
7
A systematic review of tools designed for teacher proxy-report of children's physical literacy or constituting elements.系统评价教师代理报告儿童身体素养或构成要素的工具。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2021 Oct 8;18(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12966-021-01162-3.
8
Evaluating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for bladder cancer: a systematic review using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist.评估膀胱癌患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs):使用共识基础的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)清单进行的系统评价。
BJU Int. 2018 Nov;122(5):760-773. doi: 10.1111/bju.14368. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
9
Appraisal and evaluation of the quality of life in pulmonary arterial hypertension instruments: A systematic review using COSMIN methodology.肺动脉高压工具的生活质量评估和评价:采用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Respir Med. 2024 Nov-Dec;234:107829. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107829. Epub 2024 Oct 6.
10
Instruments evaluating the self-directed learning abilities among nursing students and nurses: a systematic review of psychometric properties.评估护生和护士自主学习能力的工具:心理测量学特性的系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1072-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Compliance with transmission-based precautions, and associated factors among healthcare providers in Cameroon: a cross-sectional study.喀麦隆医疗服务提供者对基于传播的预防措施的依从性及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2025 Mar 11;14(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s13756-025-01523-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Nurses' compliance to standard precautions prior to and during COVID-19.护士在 COVID-19 前后对标准预防措施的遵守情况。
Int Nurs Rev. 2024 Mar;71(1):20-27. doi: 10.1111/inr.12830. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
2
Scale of Adherence to Good Hospital Practices for COVID-19: Psychometric Properties.《遵守 COVID-19 良好医院实践准则的量表:心理测量学特性》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 23;19(19):12025. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912025.
3
Standard Precaution Knowledge and Behavioral Intentions Among Students in the Healthcare Field: A Cross-Sectional Study.
标准预防知识与医护领域学生行为意向的相关性:一项横断面研究。
J Nurs Res. 2022 Oct 1;30(5):e229. doi: 10.1097/jnr.0000000000000512.
4
Creation and content validity of a scale for assessing adherence to good practices for COVID-19.评估 COVID-19 良好实践依从性的量表的编制和内容效度。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2022 Jul 29;75(5):e20210223. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0223. eCollection 2022.
5
Appraisal and evaluation of the instruments measuring the nursing work environment: A systematic review.评估和评价护理工作环境的工具:系统评价。
J Nurs Manag. 2022 Apr;30(3):670-683. doi: 10.1111/jonm.13559. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Factors associated with the compliance of standard precaution; review article.与标准预防措施依从性相关的因素;综述文章。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Feb;71(2(B)):713-717. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.416.
7
The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
Int J Surg. 2021 Apr;88:105906. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
Knowledge and compliance with standard precautions among registered nurses: A cross-sectional study.注册护士对标准预防措施的知晓与依从性:一项横断面研究。
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2021 Jan 29;62:419-424. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.01.058. eCollection 2021 Feb.
9
Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Standard Precautions Questionnaire for health professionals in Brazil.巴西版标准预防措施问卷在巴西卫生专业人员中的心理测量学特性。
Rev Bras Enferm. 2020 Nov 23;73(s6):e20190518. doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2019-0518. eCollection 2020.
10
The Factors Influencing Adherence to Standard Precautions Scale - Student version (FIASP- SV): A psychometric validation.影响标准预防措施依从性量表 - 学生版(FIASP - SV):一项心理测量学验证
Infect Dis Health. 2021 May;26(2):85-94. doi: 10.1016/j.idh.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Nov 1.