• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉支架置入术的患者选择标准与操作规范化——单中心经验

Patient Selection Criteria and Procedural Standardization for Carotid Artery Stenting-A Single Center Experience.

作者信息

Calo Paolo, Oberhuber Alexander, Görtz Hartmut

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Bonifatius Hospital Lingen, 49808 Lingen, Germany.

Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3534. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103534.

DOI:10.3390/jcm12103534
PMID:37240640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10219064/
Abstract

The gold standard for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis is the carotid endarterectomy (CEA). According to current guidelines, carotid artery stenting (CAS) is an alternative. Randomized control trials (RCTs) show significantly higher rates of peri-interventional strokes after CAS compared to CEA. However, these trials were usually characterized by a great heterogeneity in the CAS procedure. In this retrospective analysis from 2012 to 2020, 202 symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were treated with CAS. Patients were carefully pre-selected according to anatomical and clinical criteria. In all cases, the same steps and material were used. All interventions were performed by five experienced vascular surgeons. Primary endpoints of this study were perioperative death and stroke. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis was present in 77% of the patients and symptomatic in 23%. The mean age was 66 years. The average degree of stenosis was 81%. The CAS technical success rate was 100%. Periprocedural complications occurred in 1.5% of cases, including one major stroke (0.5%) and two minor strokes (1%). The results of this study indicate that through a strict patient selection based on anatomical and clinical criteria, CAS can be performed with very low complication rates. Furthermore, standardization of the materials and the procedure itself is crucial.

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是治疗颈动脉狭窄的金标准。根据现行指南,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)是一种替代方法。随机对照试验(RCT)表明,与CEA相比,CAS术后围手术期卒中发生率显著更高。然而,这些试验的特点通常是CAS手术存在很大的异质性。在这项2012年至2020年的回顾性分析中,202例有症状和无症状患者接受了CAS治疗。根据解剖和临床标准对患者进行了仔细的预先筛选。在所有病例中,使用相同的步骤和材料。所有干预均由五位经验丰富的血管外科医生进行。本研究的主要终点是围手术期死亡和卒中。77%的患者存在无症状性颈动脉狭窄,23%有症状。平均年龄为66岁。平均狭窄程度为81%。CAS技术成功率为100%。围手术期并发症发生率为1.5%,包括1例严重卒中(0.5%)和2例轻度卒中(1%)。本研究结果表明,通过基于解剖和临床标准的严格患者选择,CAS可以以非常低的并发症发生率进行。此外,材料和手术本身的标准化至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/b1e473f5eb87/jcm-12-03534-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/7fad2c0b830e/jcm-12-03534-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/2bd2cbe18d27/jcm-12-03534-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/3f2047dd8fb6/jcm-12-03534-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/b1e473f5eb87/jcm-12-03534-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/7fad2c0b830e/jcm-12-03534-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/2bd2cbe18d27/jcm-12-03534-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/3f2047dd8fb6/jcm-12-03534-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/de7b/10219064/b1e473f5eb87/jcm-12-03534-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Patient Selection Criteria and Procedural Standardization for Carotid Artery Stenting-A Single Center Experience.颈动脉支架置入术的患者选择标准与操作规范化——单中心经验
J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3534. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103534.
2
Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 May;55(5):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
Remote pre-procedural ischemic stroke as the greatest risk in carotid‑stenting‑associated stroke and death: a single center's experience.远程术前缺血性卒中是颈动脉支架置入相关卒中和死亡的最大风险:单中心经验
Int Angiol. 2017 Aug;36(4):306-315. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.16.03737-8. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
4
Differential outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy performed exclusively by vascular surgeons in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉内膜切除术与血管外科医生实施的颈动脉支架置入术的疗效差异:颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Feb;57(2):303-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.014. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Outcome of carotid artery stenting in the hands of vascular surgeons.血管外科医生进行颈动脉支架置入术的结果。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 Aug;402(5):805-810. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1585-6. Epub 2017 May 30.
6
7
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者的颈动脉支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术比较(国际颈动脉支架置入研究):一项包含成本效益分析的随机对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200.
8
Procedural Safety Comparison Between Transcarotid Artery Revascularization, Carotid Endarterectomy, and Carotid Stenting: Perioperative and 1-Year Rates of Stroke or Death.经颈动脉血运重建术、颈动脉内膜切除术和颈动脉支架置入术的围手术期和 1 年卒中或死亡率的操作安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e024964. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024964. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
9
Ischemic complications after tailored carotid artery stenting in different subpopulations with high-grade stenosis: feared but rare.不同亚组严重狭窄患者行定制化颈动脉支架置入术后的缺血性并发症:令人担忧但罕见。
J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Jan;22(1):189-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.09.005. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
10
Carotid artery stenting versus endarterectomy for the treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with carotid artery stenosis: 2 years' experience in a high-volume center.颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状和无症状颈动脉狭窄患者:一家大型中心的2年经验
Adv Clin Exp Med. 2018 Dec;27(12):1691-1695. doi: 10.17219/acem/75902.

本文引用的文献

1
Editor's Choice - European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2023 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease.编辑推荐——欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2023年动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病管理临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2023 Jan;65(1):7-111. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.04.011. Epub 2022 May 20.
2
Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.无症状、非 80 岁以上、标准风险的颈动脉狭窄患者支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的临床试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Apr;75(4):1276-1283.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.10.020. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
3
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy.
无症状性颈动脉手术试验 2(ACST-2):颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的随机比较
Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1065-1073. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3. Epub 2021 Aug 29.
4
Carotid artery stenting in a single center, single operator, single type of device and 15 years of follow-up.在单一中心、由单一操作者使用单一类型设备进行颈动脉支架置入术并随访15年。
CVIR Endovasc. 2018;1(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s42155-018-0008-2. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
5
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
6
Impact of hospital volume on long-term neurological outcome in patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.医院手术量对接受颈动脉支架置入术患者长期神经学预后的影响。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jun 1;89(7):1242-1249. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26989. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
7
Randomized Trial of Stent versus Surgery for Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis.无症状性颈动脉狭窄支架治疗与手术治疗随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2016 Mar 17;374(11):1011-20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1515706. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
8
Predictors of Stroke, Myocardial Infarction or Death within 30 Days of Carotid Artery Stenting: Results from the International Carotid Stenting Study.颈动脉支架置入术后30天内发生卒中、心肌梗死或死亡的预测因素:国际颈动脉支架置入研究结果
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Mar;51(3):327-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.08.013. Epub 2015 Oct 24.
9
Carotid Anatomy Does Not Predict the Risk of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in the ICSS-MRI Substudy.在国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)-MRI子研究中,颈动脉解剖结构无法预测颈动脉支架置入术后弥散加权成像上新发缺血性脑病变的风险。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;51(1):14-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.08.012. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
10
Long-term outcomes after stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) randomised trial.支架置入术与动脉内膜切除术治疗有症状颈动脉狭窄的长期疗效:国际颈动脉支架置入术研究(ICSS)随机试验
Lancet. 2015 Feb 7;385(9967):529-38. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61184-3. Epub 2014 Oct 14.