Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Michigan, 2350 Hayward Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Great Lakes Water Authority, 9300W Jefferson Ave, Detroit, MI 48209, USA.
Water Res. 2023 Jul 15;240:120078. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120078. Epub 2023 May 17.
A consequential life cycle assessment (LCA) was utilized to compare the environmental impacts of food waste and sewage sludge management strategies. The strategies included a novel two-phase anaerobic digestion (AD) system and alternatives including landfill, waste-to-energy, composting, anaerobic membrane bioreactor, and conventional AD (wet continuous stirred-tank reactor [CSTR]). The co-management of food waste with sewage sludge was also considered for the two-phase AD system and for a conventional AD reactor. A multidimensional LCA approach was taken, considering the five-midpoint impact categories of global warming, smog, human health particulate, acidification, and eutrophication estimated using the U.S. EPA Tool for the Reduction and Assessment of Chemical and Other Environmental Impacts. Co-management of food waste and sewage sludge using the novel two-phase AD system was shown to maximize energy recovery and had a net global warming benefit while reducing other environmental impacts compared with the alternative management strategies. It had similar relative environmental advantages across all categories as conventional AD, with the advantage of a smaller physical footprint. However, both approaches featured net environmental burdens when the background electric grid intensity fell below 0.25 kg CO-eq kWh, as could be expected in a decarbonized electric future. Upgrading the biogas produced from AD to renewable natural gas can displace the use of fossil natural gas for other non-electricity energy requirements that are difficult to decarbonize and may extend the time period of significant environmental benefits of utilizing AD for organic waste management. Treatment of the nutrient-rich supernatant generated by the novel two-phase AD system could be an obstacle for utilities with stringent nutrient discharge limits. Future research and full-scale implementation are needed to demonstrate the benefits of the two-phase AD system predicted through this analysis.
采用具有重要意义的生命周期评估(LCA)来比较食物垃圾和污水污泥管理策略的环境影响。这些策略包括一种新型的两相厌氧消化(AD)系统,以及包括垃圾填埋、能源利用、堆肥、厌氧膜生物反应器和传统 AD(湿式连续搅拌罐反应器[CSTR])在内的替代方案。还考虑了将食物垃圾与污水污泥共同管理用于两相 AD 系统和传统 AD 反应器。采用多维生命周期评估方法,考虑了全球变暖、烟雾、人类健康颗粒物、酸化和富营养化这五个中点影响类别,使用美国环保局化学品和其他环境影响减排评估工具进行了估计。与替代管理策略相比,新型两相 AD 系统协同管理食物垃圾和污水污泥可以最大程度地回收能源,并具有净全球变暖效益,同时减少了其他环境影响。与传统 AD 相比,它在所有类别中都具有相似的相对环境优势,具有较小的物理足迹。然而,当背景电网强度低于 0.25kgCO-eq kWh 时,这两种方法都具有净环境负担,这在脱碳的未来电网中是可以预期的。将 AD 产生的沼气升级为可再生天然气可以替代化石天然气在其他难以脱碳的非电力能源需求中的使用,并可能延长利用 AD 进行有机废物管理的显著环境效益的时间。新型两相 AD 系统产生的富营养物上清液的处理可能对具有严格养分排放限制的公用事业构成障碍。需要进行未来研究和全面实施,以证明通过该分析预测的两相 AD 系统的好处。