Suppr超能文献

下肢反应时间在接触与非接触前交叉韧带重建术后患者中的比较。

Lower Extremity Reaction Time in Individuals With Contact Versus Noncontact Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries After Reconstruction.

机构信息

Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

Department of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2024 Jan 1;59(1):66-72. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0428.22.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Deficits in perceptual-motor function, like visuomotor reaction time (VMRT), are risk factors for primary and secondary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. Noncontact ACL injuries have been associated with slower reaction time, but whether this association exists for patients with contact ACL injuries is unknown. Exploring differences in VMRT among individuals with contact versus noncontact ACL injuries may provide a more comprehensive understanding of modifiable risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To compare lower extremity VMRT (LEVMRT) in individuals with contact or noncontact ACL injuries after ACL reconstruction (ACLR).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Research laboratory.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 36 participants with primary, unilateral ACLR completed an LEVMRT assessment (contact ACL injury = 20 [56%], noncontact ACL injury = 16 [44%]).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The LEVMRT was assessed bilaterally and collected using a series of wireless light discs deactivated by individuals with their feet. The ACLR-active LEVMRT (ie, ACLR limb is deactivating lights) and ACLR-stable LEVMRT were compared using separate analyses of covariance to determine the association with contact or noncontact injury using time since surgery as a covariate.

RESULTS

After controlling for time since surgery, a difference and large effect size between groups was found for the ACLR-stable LEVMRT (P = .010; η2 = 0.250) but not for the ACLR-active (P = .340; η2 = 0.065) condition. The contact group exhibited slower ACLR-stable LEVMRT (521.7 ± 59.3 milliseconds) than the noncontact group (483.4 ± 83.9 milliseconds).

CONCLUSIONS

Individuals with contact ACL injury demonstrated a slower LEVMRT while their ACLR limb was stabilizing. The group differences during the ACLR-stable LEVMRT task might indicate deficits in perceptual-motor function when the surgical limb maintains postural control during a reaction time task. After ACLR, individuals with contact injuries may need additional motor learning interventions to enhance perceptual-motor functioning.

摘要

背景

运动知觉功能障碍,如视运动反应时(VMRT),是前交叉韧带(ACL)初次和复发性损伤的危险因素。非接触性 ACL 损伤与较慢的反应时间有关,但接触性 ACL 损伤患者是否存在这种关联尚不清楚。探索接触性和非接触性 ACL 损伤患者之间 VMRT 的差异,可能有助于更全面地了解可改变的危险因素。

目的

比较 ACL 重建(ACLR)后接触性和非接触性 ACL 损伤患者的下肢 VMRT(LEVMRT)。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

研究实验室。

患者或其他参与者

共有 36 名单侧 ACLR 的患者(接触性 ACL 损伤 20 例[56%],非接触性 ACL 损伤 16 例[44%])完成了 LEVMRT 评估。

主要观察指标

双侧使用一系列无线光盘进行 LEVMRT 评估,个体用脚使光盘失效。使用协方差分析分别比较 ACLR 稳定期 LEVMRT 和 ACLR 活跃期 LEVMRT,以手术时间为协变量,确定与接触性或非接触性损伤的关联。

结果

控制手术时间后,发现 ACLR 稳定期 LEVMRT 存在组间差异和较大的效应量(P =.010;η2 = 0.250),但 ACLR 活跃期 LEVMRT 无组间差异(P =.340;η2 = 0.065)。接触性损伤组的 ACLR 稳定期 LEVMRT(521.7 ± 59.3 毫秒)慢于非接触性损伤组(483.4 ± 83.9 毫秒)。

结论

接触性 ACL 损伤患者在 ACLR 肢体稳定时,LEVMRT 较慢。ACL 稳定期 LEVMRT 任务中的组间差异可能表明,在反应时间任务中,手术肢体维持姿势控制时,存在运动知觉功能障碍。ACL 重建后,接触性损伤患者可能需要额外的运动学习干预,以增强运动知觉功能。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验