Suppr超能文献

物理治疗师是否采用行为医学方法?感知和观察到的实践行为比较。

Do Physical Therapists Practice a Behavioral Medicine Approach? A Comparison of Perceived and Observed Practice Behaviors.

机构信息

School of Health, Care and Social Welfare, Mälardalen University, Västerås, Sweden.

出版信息

Phys Ther. 2023 May 4;103(5). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzad025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A behavioral medicine approach, incorporating a biopsychosocial view and behavior change techniques, is recommended in physical therapy for the management of musculoskeletal pain. However, little is known about physical therapists' actual practice behavior regarding the behavioral medicine approach. The aim of this study was to examine how physical therapists in primary health care judge their own practice behavior of a behavioral medicine approach in the assessment and treatment of patients with persistent musculoskeletal pain versus how they practice a behavioral medicine approach as observed by independent experts in video recordings of patient consultations.

METHODS

A prospective cohort study was conducted. Video recordings of 23 physical therapists' clinical behavior in 139 patient consultations were observed by independent experts and compared with the physical therapists' self-reported practice behavior, using a protocol including 24 clinical behaviors. The difference between observed and self-reported clinical behaviors was analyzed with a Chi-square test and a Fisher exact test.

RESULTS

The behavioral medicine approach was, in general, practiced to a small extent and half of the self-reported clinical behaviors were overestimated when compared with the observed behaviors. According to the observations, the physical perspective dominated in assessment and treatment, the functional behavioral analysis was never performed, and the mean number of behavior change techniques used was 0.7.

CONCLUSION

There was a discrepancy between how physical therapists perceived the extent to which they practiced a behavioral medicine approach in their clinical behavior compared with what the independent researchers observed in the video recordings.

IMPACT

This study demonstrates the importance of using observations instead of using self-reports when evaluating professionals' clinical behavior. The results also suggest that-to ensure that physical therapy integrates the biopsychosocial model of health-physical therapists need to increase their focus on psychosocial factors in clinical practice.

摘要

目的

行为医学方法,结合生物心理社会观点和行为改变技术,在物理治疗中被推荐用于管理肌肉骨骼疼痛。然而,对于物理治疗师在肌肉骨骼疼痛患者评估和治疗中实际应用行为医学方法的行为知之甚少。本研究旨在检查初级保健中的物理治疗师如何评估自己在评估和治疗持续性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者时应用行为医学方法的实践行为,以及他们在患者咨询的视频记录中观察到的独立专家如何实践行为医学方法。

方法

进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。通过独立专家观察 23 名物理治疗师在 139 次患者咨询中的临床行为,并与物理治疗师的自我报告实践行为进行比较,使用包括 24 项临床行为的方案。使用卡方检验和 Fisher 确切检验分析观察到的和自我报告的临床行为之间的差异。

结果

行为医学方法的应用程度总体上较小,与观察到的行为相比,一半的自我报告临床行为被高估。根据观察结果,在评估和治疗中,物理视角占主导地位,从未进行功能行为分析,使用的行为改变技术的平均数量为 0.7。

结论

物理治疗师对自己在临床行为中应用行为医学方法的程度的看法与独立研究人员在视频记录中观察到的情况之间存在差异。

影响

本研究表明,在评估专业人员的临床行为时,使用观察结果而不是自我报告非常重要。结果还表明,为了确保物理治疗将健康的生物心理社会模型整合在一起,物理治疗师需要在临床实践中更加关注心理社会因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/79e3/10228382/e91233fbf9f5/pzad025f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验