• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向公民技术的生活实验室:一个案例研究。为志愿消防服务进行社区基础设施建设。

Living labs for civic technologies: a case study. Community infrastructuring for a volunteer firefighting service.

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Interuniversity Department of Regional and Urban Studies and Planning, University of Turin and Polytechnic of Turin, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2023 May 12;11:1189226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189226. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189226
PMID:37250084
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10213287/
Abstract

Digital technologies are increasingly adopted and developed in living labs, to support and enable co-production processes around wellbeing related public services. This research report presents the case of one of the local laboratories established by the European project NLAB4CIT, in the city of Kaisariani, Greece. In order to enhance community engagement, participatory design methods are applied under an "infrastructuring" notion; the living lab model is reapproached as community infrastructure; and digital tools are understood as civic technologies. The article reports on the initial co-design phases, in order to provide other living labs on digital co-production with an overview on the socio-technical challenges encountered. These challenges concern how community actors can engage in the process of co-production of public services, and how digital technologies can be introduced to this purpose. Strength factors emerge such as the existence of an already active community, the creation of an enduring space of collaboration between researchers and citizens, and a civic approach to technology that makes them accessible and tailored. Open challenges concern the role of the public administration, the extent to which technologies are actually co-designed and co-developed, and some technical issues such as internet accessibility.

摘要

数字技术在生活实验室中被越来越多地采用和开发,以支持和实现与福祉相关的公共服务的共同生产过程。本研究报告介绍了由欧洲项目 NLAB4CIT 在希腊 Kaisariani 市建立的一个当地实验室的案例。为了增强社区参与,在“基础设施建设”的概念下应用了参与式设计方法;将生活实验室模型重新定义为社区基础设施;并将数字工具理解为公民技术。本文报告了最初的共同设计阶段,以便为其他数字共同生产的生活实验室提供遇到的社会技术挑战的概述。这些挑战涉及社区参与者如何参与公共服务的共同生产过程,以及如何为此引入数字技术。出现了一些优势因素,例如已经活跃的社区的存在、研究人员和公民之间持久合作空间的创建,以及对技术的公民方法,使它们具有可及性和针对性。开放的挑战涉及公共行政的作用、技术实际上共同设计和共同开发的程度,以及一些技术问题,如互联网的可访问性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/03a852c45938/fpubh-11-1189226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/86115e8bf6c3/fpubh-11-1189226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/240ec4e39bb4/fpubh-11-1189226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/958344e4dc6e/fpubh-11-1189226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/03a852c45938/fpubh-11-1189226-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/86115e8bf6c3/fpubh-11-1189226-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/240ec4e39bb4/fpubh-11-1189226-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/958344e4dc6e/fpubh-11-1189226-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e76e/10213287/03a852c45938/fpubh-11-1189226-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Living labs for civic technologies: a case study. Community infrastructuring for a volunteer firefighting service.面向公民技术的生活实验室:一个案例研究。为志愿消防服务进行社区基础设施建设。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 12;11:1189226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1189226. eCollection 2023.
2
Australia in 2030: what is our path to health for all?2030 年的澳大利亚:全民健康之路在何方?
Med J Aust. 2021 May;214 Suppl 8:S5-S40. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51020.
3
Guidelines for a participatory Smart City model to address Amazon's urban environmental problems.应对亚马逊地区城市环境问题的参与式智慧城市模型指南。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023 Dec 12;9:e1694. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1694. eCollection 2023.
4
Public Lab: Community-Based Approaches to Urban and Environmental Health and Justice.公共实验室:社区主导的城市和环境健康与公正方法。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Jun;24(3):971-997. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0059-8. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
"A living lab within a lab": approaches and challenges for scaling digital public health in resource-constrained settings.“实验室中的生活实验室”:资源有限环境下数字公共卫生规模化的方法和挑战。
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 7;11:1187069. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1187069. eCollection 2023.
6
Digitalising the Age-Friendly City: Insights from Participatory Action Research.数字化友好城市:参与式行动研究的启示。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Nov 9;17(21):8281. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218281.
7
Urban living labs as innovation infrastructure for local urban intervention acceleration and student social learning: the impacts on community wellbeing in Heerlen.城市生活实验室作为创新基础设施,加速地方城市干预措施和学生社会学习:对海尔伦社区福祉的影响。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1242151. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1242151. eCollection 2023.
8
Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.
9
Cocreating a Harmonized Living Lab for Big Data-Driven Hybrid Persona Development: Protocol for Cocreating, Testing, and Seeking Consensus.共同创建一个用于大数据驱动的混合角色开发的协调生活实验室:共同创建、测试和寻求共识的协议
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 6;11(1):e34567. doi: 10.2196/34567.
10
The Value of Including People with Dementia in the Co-Design of Personalized eHealth Technologies.将痴呆症患者纳入个性化电子健康技术共同设计的价值。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2019;47(3):164-175. doi: 10.1159/000497804. Epub 2019 Jun 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Co-creation in a digital health living lab: A case study.数字健康生活实验室中的共同创造:案例研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 17;10:892930. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.892930. eCollection 2022.
2
Technology for societal change: Evaluating a mobile app addressing the emotional needs of people experiencing homelessness.推动社会变革的技术:评估一款满足无家可归者情感需求的移动应用程序。
Health Informatics J. 2022 Oct-Dec;28(4):14604582221146720. doi: 10.1177/14604582221146720.
3
Rehabilitation Supported by Technology: Protocol for an International Cocreation and User Experience Study.
技术支持的康复:一项国际共创与用户体验研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Mar 10;11(3):e34537. doi: 10.2196/34537.
4
Co-creating Virtual Reality Interventions for Alcohol Prevention: Living Lab vs. Co-design.共同创建用于预防酒精的虚拟现实干预措施:生活实验室与共同设计。
Front Public Health. 2021 Mar 15;9:634102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.634102. eCollection 2021.