• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。

Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.

作者信息

Loignon Christine, Dupéré Sophie, Leblanc Caroline, Truchon Karoline, Bouchard Amélie, Arsenault Johanne, Pinheiro Carvalho Julia, Boudreault-Fournier Alexandrine, Marcotte Sylvain Aimé

机构信息

Department of Family and Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, Longueuil, QC, Canada.

Department of Anthropology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.

DOI:10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x
PMID:34610847
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8491375/
Abstract

To improve health equity, as well as equity in research, community-engaged research and participatory research needs to be inclusive. Equity in health research refers to the principle that anyone affected by research or who can benefit from its outcomes should have equal opportunities to contribute to it. Many researchers advocate the importance of promoting equity in research and engage in processes that foster the research involvement of lay persons, patients, and community members who are otherwise "absent" or "silent". Still, people with limited literacy skills who experience unwarranted structural barriers to healthcare access have little involvement in research. Low literacy is a major barrier to equity in health research. Yet there exist approaches and methods that promote the engagement in research of people with literacy challenges. Building on our previous research projects conducted with community members using participatory visual and sound methods (participatory mapping, photovoice, digital storytelling, etc.), we embarked on the co-creation of a digital platform in 2017. Our aim in this commentary is to report on this co-creation experience that was based on a social justice-oriented partnership. The development of the online platform was overseen by a steering committee made up of workers from community organizations involved with people with limited literacy skills, students, and researchers. In the development process, the co-creation steps included a literature review, informal interviews with key informants, and discussion and writing sessions about format and content. After numerous challenges raised and addressed during co-creation, the Engage digital platform for engagement in research went live in the winter of 2020. This platform presents, on an equal footing, approaches and methods from academic research as well as from the literacy education community engaged with people with limited literacy skills.

摘要

为了改善健康公平以及研究中的公平,社区参与研究和参与式研究需要具有包容性。健康研究中的公平是指这样一个原则,即任何受研究影响或能从其成果中受益的人都应有平等机会为研究做出贡献。许多研究人员倡导在研究中促进公平的重要性,并参与一些过程,以促进非专业人士、患者和社区成员参与研究,否则这些人会“缺席”或“沉默”。然而,那些识字技能有限且在获得医疗保健方面面临不必要结构障碍的人很少参与研究。低识字率是健康研究公平的一个主要障碍。然而,存在一些方法可以促进有识字困难的人参与研究。基于我们之前与社区成员使用参与式视觉和声音方法(参与式绘图、照片之声、数字故事等)开展的研究项目,我们于2017年开始共同创建一个数字平台。我们撰写这篇评论的目的是报告基于社会正义导向伙伴关系的这一共同创建经历。在线平台的开发由一个指导委员会监督,该委员会由与识字技能有限的人打交道的社区组织工作人员、学生和研究人员组成。在开发过程中,共同创建步骤包括文献综述、对关键信息提供者的非正式访谈,以及关于形式和内容的讨论与写作环节。在共同创建过程中提出并解决了众多挑战之后,用于参与研究的“参与”数字平台于2020年冬季上线。这个平台平等展示了学术研究以及与识字技能有限的人打交道的识字教育社区的方法和手段。

相似文献

1
Equity and inclusivity in research: co-creation of a digital platform with representatives of marginalized populations to enhance the involvement in research of people with limited literacy skills.研究中的公平性与包容性:与边缘化群体代表共同创建数字平台,以提高识字能力有限人群对研究的参与度。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 5;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00313-x.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Improving the Engagement of Underrepresented People in Health Research Through Equity-Centered Design Thinking: Qualitative Study and Process Evaluation for the Development of the Grounding Health Research in Design Toolkit.通过以公平为中心的设计思维提高代表性不足人群参与健康研究的程度:基于设计工具包开展健康研究的定性研究与过程评估
JMIR Form Res. 2023 Feb 28;7:e43101. doi: 10.2196/43101.
4
Health literacy - engaging the community in the co-creation of meaningful health navigation services: a study protocol.健康素养——让社区参与有意义的健康导航服务的共同创建:一项研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 28;18(1):505. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3315-3.
5
Ethical by Design: Engaging the Community to Co-design a Digital Health Ecosystem to Improve Overdose Prevention Efforts Among Highly Vulnerable People Who Use Drugs.设计中的伦理:让社区参与共同设计数字健康生态系统,以改善高危吸毒人群的过量用药预防工作。
Front Digit Health. 2022 May 26;4:880849. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2022.880849. eCollection 2022.
6
"The Road We Travel": Developing a co-produced narrative for a photovoice project.《我们走过的路》:为摄影展项目制作合作叙事。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2021 Aug;28(4):632-643. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12709. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
7
iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.“自我帮助”:一项在新西兰共同设计的、符合文化背景的在线疼痛管理计划。
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Feb 21;8(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9.
8
Consuming Health Information and Vulnerable Populations: Factors of Engagement and Ongoing Usage.消费健康信息与弱势群体:参与因素和持续使用
Yearb Med Inform. 2022 Aug;31(1):173-180. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1742549. Epub 2022 Dec 4.
9
Co-designing a participatory evaluation of older adult partner engagement in the mcmaster collaborative for health and aging.共同设计一项关于老年人伴侣参与麦克马斯特健康与老龄化协作项目的参与式评估。
Res Involv Engagem. 2024 Jun 11;10(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00595-x.
10
Patient public involvement (PPI) in health literacy research: Engagement of adults with literacy needs in the co-creation of a hospital-based health literacy plan.患者公众参与(PPI)在健康素养研究中的应用:有读写需求的成年人参与共同制定基于医院的健康素养计划。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1213-1220. doi: 10.1111/hex.13736. Epub 2023 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Co-creation methods for public health research - characteristics, benefits, and challenges: a Health CASCADE scoping review.公共卫生研究的共创方法——特点、益处及挑战:一项健康级联范围综述
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Mar 6;25(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02514-4.
2
"Crying in the Wilderness"-The Use of Web-Based Support in Telomere Biology Disorders: Thematic Analysis.《荒野中的哭泣》——基于网络的支持在端粒生物学紊乱中的应用:主题分析
JMIR Form Res. 2024 Dec 16;8:e64343. doi: 10.2196/64343.
3
Reliable Web-Based Auditory Cognitive Testing: Observational Study.基于网络的可靠听觉认知测试:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Dec 9;26:e58444. doi: 10.2196/58444.
4
Why and how to collect representative study samples in educational neuroscience research.为什么以及如何在教育神经科学研究中收集有代表性的研究样本。
Trends Neurosci Educ. 2024 Jun;35:100231. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2024.100231. Epub 2024 May 26.
5
Ethical Imperatives for Working With Diverse Populations in Digital Research.与数字研究中的不同人群合作的伦理准则。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 18;25:e47884. doi: 10.2196/47884.
6
2022 consensus conference on diversity, equity, and inclusion: Developing an emergency medicine research agenda for addressing racism through health care research.2022 年多样性、公平性和包容性共识会议:制定一项通过医疗保健研究解决种族主义问题的急诊医学研究议程。
Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Jul;30(7):731-741. doi: 10.1111/acem.14742. Epub 2023 May 14.
7
Understanding implementation research collaborations from a co-creation lens: Recommendations for a path forward.从共同创造视角理解实施研究合作:对前进道路的建议。
Front Health Serv. 2022;2. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.942658. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
8
Telehealth Trials to Address Health Equity in Stroke Survivors.远程医疗试验解决卒中幸存者中的健康公平问题。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):396-406. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.039566. Epub 2023 Jan 23.
9
A Practical Framework for Academics to Implement Public Engagement Interventions and Measure Their Impact.学术人员实施公众参与干预措施及衡量其影响的实用框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 16;19(20):13357. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013357.

本文引用的文献

1
Valuing All Voices: refining a trauma-informed, intersectional and critical reflexive framework for patient engagement in health research using a qualitative descriptive approach.重视所有声音:运用定性描述方法完善一个用于患者参与健康研究的创伤知情、交叉性和批判性反思框架。
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 19;6:42. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00217-2. eCollection 2020.
2
Enabling the participation of marginalized populations: case studies from a health service organization in Ontario, Canada.促进边缘化人群的参与:来自加拿大安大略省一家卫生服务机构的案例研究
Health Promot Int. 2017 Aug 1;32(4):636-649. doi: 10.1093/heapro/dav118.
3
Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review.探索社区参与在改善弱势群体健康方面的作用:一项系统综述。
Glob Health Action. 2015 Dec 18;8:29842. doi: 10.3402/gha.v8.29842. eCollection 2015.