Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Department of Health Services Management & Organisation, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Front Public Health. 2023 May 11;11:1144027. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1144027. eCollection 2023.
In recent years, Value-Based Healthcare (VBHC) has been gaining traction, particularly in hospitals. A core VBHC element is patient value, i.e., what matters most to the patient and at what cost can this be delivered. This interpretation of value implies patient engagement in patient-doctor communication. Although patient engagement in direct care in the VBHC setting is well described, patient engagement at the organizational level of improving care has hardly been studied. This systematic review maps current knowledge regarding the intensity and impact of patient engagement in VBHC initiatives. We focus on the organizational level of a continuous patient engagement model.
We performed a systematic review following PRISMA guidelines using five electronic databases. The search strategy yielded 1,546 records, of which 21 studies were eligible for inclusion. Search terms were VBHC and patient engagement, or similar keywords, and we included only empirical studies in hospitals or transmural settings at the organizational level.
We found that consultation, using either questionnaires or interviews by researchers, is the most common method to involve patients in VBHC. Higher levels of patient engagement, such as advisory roles, co-design, or collaborative teams are rare. We found no examples of the highest level of patient engagement such as patients co-leading care improvement committees.
This study included 21 articles, the majority of which were observational, resulting in a limited quality of evidence. Our review shows that patient engagement at the organizational level in VBHC initiatives still relies on low engagement tools such as questionnaires and interviews. Higher-level engagement tools such as advisory roles and collaborative teams are rarely used. Higher-level engagement offers opportunities to improve healthcare and care pathways through co-design with the people being served. We urge VBHC initiatives to embrace all levels of patient engagement to ensure that patient values find their way to the heart of these initiatives.
近年来,基于价值的医疗保健(VBHC)越来越受到关注,尤其是在医院。VBHC 的一个核心要素是患者价值,即对患者最重要的是什么,以及以何种成本可以提供这些价值。这种价值的解释意味着患者参与医患沟通。尽管 VBHC 环境中直接护理的患者参与已得到充分描述,但在提高护理质量的组织层面上,患者参与几乎没有得到研究。本系统评价绘制了当前关于 VBHC 计划中患者参与的强度和影响的知识图谱。我们专注于持续患者参与模型的组织层面。
我们遵循 PRISMA 指南进行了系统评价,使用了五个电子数据库。搜索策略产生了 1546 条记录,其中 21 项研究符合纳入标准。搜索词为 VBHC 和患者参与,或类似的关键词,我们仅纳入在医院或组织层面的跨部门环境中进行的实证研究。
我们发现,咨询,无论是使用问卷还是研究人员进行访谈,都是将患者纳入 VBHC 的最常见方法。更高级别的患者参与,如咨询角色、共同设计或协作团队,很少见。我们没有发现患者共同领导护理改善委员会等最高级别患者参与的例子。
本研究包括 21 篇文章,其中大多数为观察性研究,因此证据质量有限。我们的综述表明,VBHC 计划中组织层面的患者参与仍然依赖于问卷和访谈等低参与工具。更高级别的参与工具,如咨询角色和协作团队,很少使用。更高层次的参与提供了通过与服务对象共同设计来改善医疗保健和护理途径的机会。我们敦促 VBHC 计划采用所有级别的患者参与,以确保患者价值观能够融入这些计划的核心。