• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于患者特异性计算机断层扫描重建模型的经皮肾镜取石术手术规划

On Surgical Planning of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Patient-Specific CTRs.

作者信息

Pedrosa Filipe C, Feizi Navid, Zhang Ruisi, Delaunay Remi, Sacco Dianne, Jagadeesan Jayender, Patel Rajni

机构信息

Western University, ON, Canada.

Canadian Surgical Technologies and Advanced Robotics, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2022 Sep;13437:626-635. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_60. Epub 2022 Sep 17.

DOI:10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_60
PMID:37252091
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10217565/
Abstract

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is considered a first-choice minimally invasive procedure for treating kidney stones larger than 2 cm. It yields higher stone-free rates than other minimally invasive techniques and is employed when extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy or uteroscopy are, for instance, infeasible. Using this technique, surgeons create a tract through which a scope is inserted for gaining access to the stones. Traditional PCNL tools, however, present limited maneuverability, may require multiple punctures and often lead to excessive torquing of the instruments which can damage the kidney parenchyma and thus increase the risk of hemorrhage. We approach this problem by proposing a nested optimization-driven scheme for determining a single tract surgical plan along which a patient-specific concentric-tube robot (CTR) is deployed so as to enhance manipulability along the most dominant directions of the stone presentations. The approach is illustrated with seven sets of clinical data from patients who underwent PCNL. The simulated results may set the stage for achieving higher stone-free rates through single tract PCNL interventions while decreasing blood loss.

摘要

经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)被认为是治疗直径大于2cm肾结石的首选微创手术。与其他微创技术相比,它能获得更高的结石清除率,当体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查不可行时会采用该方法。使用这种技术时,外科医生会创建一个通道,通过该通道插入内窥镜以接近结石。然而,传统的PCNL工具操作灵活性有限,可能需要多次穿刺,并且常常导致器械过度扭转,这可能会损伤肾实质,从而增加出血风险。我们通过提出一种嵌套优化驱动的方案来解决这个问题,该方案用于确定单通道手术计划,沿着该计划部署针对患者的同心管机器人(CTR),以增强沿结石最主要呈现方向的可操作性。通过七组接受PCNL治疗患者的临床数据对该方法进行了说明。模拟结果可能为通过单通道PCNL干预实现更高的结石清除率同时减少失血奠定基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/99f9c5586788/nihms-1850125-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/21671ec5a2d9/nihms-1850125-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/42af7a971f4e/nihms-1850125-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/99f9c5586788/nihms-1850125-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/21671ec5a2d9/nihms-1850125-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/42af7a971f4e/nihms-1850125-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/147f/10217565/99f9c5586788/nihms-1850125-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
On Surgical Planning of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Patient-Specific CTRs.基于患者特异性计算机断层扫描重建模型的经皮肾镜取石术手术规划
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2022 Sep;13437:626-635. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-16449-1_60. Epub 2022 Sep 17.
2
Image-guided surgical planning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with patient-specific CTRs.基于患者特异性 CT 重建的经皮肾镜取石术的图像引导手术规划。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 May;19(5):801-810. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-03029-3. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
3
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 24(11):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3.
4
Meta-analysis of Optimal Management of Lower Pole Stone of 10 - 20 mm: Flexible Ureteroscopy (FURS) versus Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy (ESWL) versus Percutaneus Nephrolithotomy (PCNL).10 - 20毫米下极结石最佳治疗方法的荟萃分析:可弯曲输尿管镜检查(FURS)与体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)对比经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)
Acta Med Indones. 2018 Jan;50(1):18-25.
5
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones.体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)与经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)或逆行肾内手术(RIRS)治疗肾结石的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7(4):CD007044. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub2.
6
[Comparison of tubeless-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of upper-ureteral calculi sized ≥ 1.5 cm].无管经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗直径≥1.5 cm上段输尿管结石的比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb 18;47(1):170-4.
7
Effectiveness of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Renal Stones: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.经皮肾镜取石术、逆行性肾内手术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗肾结石的有效性:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Medicina (Kaunas). 2020 Dec 30;57(1):26. doi: 10.3390/medicina57010026.
8
Comparison of stone-free rates following shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for treatment of renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗肾结石的无石率:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 21;14(2):e0211316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211316. eCollection 2019.
9
Which is the best treatment of pediatric upper urinary tract stones among extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a systematic review.体外冲击波碎石术、经皮肾镜取石术和逆行性肾内手术治疗小儿上尿路结石的最佳治疗方法:系统评价。
BMC Urol. 2019 Oct 23;19(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0520-2.
10
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of shockwave lithotripsy, retrograde intrarenal surgery, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower-pole renal stones: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.冲击波碎石术、逆行肾内手术、经皮肾镜取石术及微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的疗效与安全性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Mar;99(10):e19403. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019403.

引用本文的文献

1
Image-guided surgical planning of percutaneous nephrolithotomy with patient-specific CTRs.基于患者特异性 CT 重建的经皮肾镜取石术的图像引导手术规划。
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2024 May;19(5):801-810. doi: 10.1007/s11548-023-03029-3. Epub 2023 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Asymptotically Optimal Kinematic Design of Robots using Motion Planning.基于运动规划的机器人渐近最优运动学设计
Auton Robots. 2019 Feb;43(2):345-357. doi: 10.1007/s10514-018-9766-x. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
2
Ultrasound-guided versus fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.超声引导与透视引导经皮肾镜取石术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Urol. 2019 May;37(5):777-788. doi: 10.1007/s00345-018-2443-z. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
3
Toward the Design of Personalized Continuum Surgical Robots.向个性化连续体手术机器人设计迈进。
Ann Biomed Eng. 2018 Oct;46(10):1522-1533. doi: 10.1007/s10439-018-2062-2. Epub 2018 May 31.
4
Design of patient-specific concentric tube robots using path planning from 3-D ultrasound.利用三维超声的路径规划设计定制化同心管机器人。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2017 Jul;2017:165-168. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2017.8036788.
5
Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) a critical review.经皮肾镜碎石术(PCNL)的关键评价。
Int J Surg. 2016 Dec;36(Pt D):660-664. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.028. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
6
Optimizing Design Parameters for Sets of Concentric Tube Robots using Sampling-based Motion Planning.使用基于采样的运动规划优化同心管机器人组的设计参数。
Rep U S. 2015 Sep 28;2015:4381-4387. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2015.7353999.
7
Concentric Tube Robot Design and Optimization Based on Task and Anatomical Constraints.基于任务和解剖学约束的同心管机器人设计与优化
IEEE Trans Robot. 2015 Feb 3;31(1):67-84. doi: 10.1109/TRO.2014.2378431.
8
Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy.经皮肾镜取石术的并发症
World J Urol. 2015 Aug;33(8):1069-77. doi: 10.1007/s00345-014-1400-8. Epub 2014 Sep 14.
9
A Telerobotic System for Transnasal Surgery.一种用于经鼻手术的远程机器人系统。
IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron. 2013 Jun 19;19(3):996-1006. doi: 10.1109/TMECH.2013.2265804.
10
Motion Planning for Concentric Tube Robots Using Mechanics-based Models.基于力学模型的同心管机器人运动规划
Rep U S. 2011:5153-5159. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2011.6095168.