Dr Garlapati is affiliated with Newborn Specialists of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma. Drs Vali and Lakshminrusimha are affiliated with Department of Pediatrics, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California. Mr Smith is affiliated with Department of Respiratory Care, UC Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California. Dr Zavorsky is affiliated with Department of Physiology and Membrane Biology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California.
Respir Care. 2024 Feb 28;69(3):339-344. doi: 10.4187/respcare.10696.
Infants with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy are often treated with therapeutic hypothermia and high-frequency ventilation. Fluctuations in P during therapeutic hypothermia are associated with poor neurodevelopmental outcomes. Transcutaneous CO monitors offer a noninvasive estimate of P represented by transcutaneously measured partial pressure of carbon dioxide (P ). We aimed to assess the precision between P and P values in neonates undergoing therapeutic hypothermia.
This was a retrospective chart review of 10 neonates who underwent therapeutic hypothermia requiring respiratory support over 2 y. A range of 2-27 simultaneous P and P pairs of measurements per neonate were analyzed via linear mixed models and a Bland-Altman plot for multiple observations per neonate.
A linear mixed-effect model demonstrated that P and P (controlling for sex) were similar. The 95% CI of the mean difference ranged from -2.3 to 5.7 mm Hg ( = .41). However, precision was poor as the P ranged from > 18 mm Hg to < 13 mm Hg than P values for 95% of observations.
The neonates' P was as much as 18 mm Hg higher to 13 mm Hg lower than the P 95% of the time. Transcutaneous CO monitoring may not be a good trending tool, nor is it appropriate for estimating P in patients undergoing therapeutic hypothermia.
患有缺氧缺血性脑病的婴儿常接受治疗性低温和高频通气治疗。治疗性低温期间 P 的波动与不良神经发育结局相关。经皮 CO 监测仪通过经皮测量二氧化碳分压(P )提供了 P 的无创估计值。我们旨在评估接受治疗性低温的新生儿中 P 与 P 值之间的精密度。
这是一项回顾性图表研究,纳入了 10 名在 2 年内接受需要呼吸支持的治疗性低温的新生儿。通过线性混合效应模型和每例新生儿多次测量的 Bland-Altman 图分析了每例新生儿 2-27 对同时的 P 和 P 测量值。
线性混合效应模型表明 P 和 P(控制性别)相似。平均差异的 95%CI 范围为 -2.3 至 5.7mmHg( =.41)。然而,由于 P 值范围为 > 18mmHg 至 < 13mmHg,超过 95%的观察值的 P 值精度较差。
在 95%的时间里,新生儿的 P 值比 P 值高 18mmHg 至低 13mmHg。经皮 CO 监测可能不是一个很好的趋势监测工具,也不适合用于估计接受治疗性低温的患者的 P 值。