• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基因-环境交互作用评估中的分类偏差。

Misclassification Bias in the Assessment of Gene-by-Environment Interactions.

机构信息

Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 2023 Sep 1;34(5):673-680. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001635. Epub 2023 May 30.

DOI:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001635
PMID:37255239
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10524511/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Misclassification bias is a common concern in epidemiologic studies. Despite strong bias on main effects, gene-environment interactions have been shown to be biased towards the null under gene-environment independence. In the context of a recent article examining the interaction between nerve agent exposure and paraoxonase-1 gene on Gulf War Illness, we aimed to assess the impact of recall bias-a common misclassfication bias-on the identification of gene-environment interactions when the independence assumption is violated.

METHODS

We derive equations to quantify the bias of the interaction, and numerically illustrate these results by simulating a case-control study of 1000 cases and 1000 controls. Simulation input parameters included exposure prevalence, strength of gene-environment dependence, strength of the main effect, exposure specificity among cases, and strength of the gene-environment interaction.

RESULTS

We show that, even if gene-environment independence is violated, we can bound possible gene-environment interactions by knowing the strength and direction of the gene-environment dependence ( ) and the observed gene-environment interaction ( )-thus often still allowing for the identification of such interactions. Depending on whether is larger or smaller than the inverse of , is a lower (if ) or upper (if ) bound for the true interaction. In addition, the bias magnitude is somewhat predictable by examining other characteristics such as exposure prevalence, the strength of the exposure main effect, and directions of the recall bias and gene-environment dependence.

CONCLUSIONS

Even if gene-environment dependence exists, we may still be able to identify gene-environment interactions even when misclassification bias is present.

摘要

背景

在流行病学研究中,分类偏倚是一个常见的问题。尽管主要效应存在很强的偏倚,但在基因-环境独立性假设下,基因-环境相互作用已被证明偏向于零。在最近一篇研究神经毒剂暴露与海湾战争病中对氧磷酶 1 基因相互作用的文章中,我们旨在评估在违反独立性假设时,回忆偏倚(一种常见的分类偏倚)对识别基因-环境相互作用的影响。

方法

我们推导出量化相互作用偏倚的方程,并通过模拟一个包含 1000 例病例和 1000 例对照的病例对照研究来数值说明这些结果。模拟输入参数包括暴露流行率、基因-环境依赖性强度、主要效应强度、病例中暴露的特异性以及基因-环境相互作用强度。

结果

我们表明,即使违反了基因-环境独立性,我们也可以通过了解基因-环境依赖性的强度和方向()和观察到的基因-环境相互作用()来限制可能的基因-环境相互作用-因此通常仍然允许识别这些相互作用。取决于是否大于或小于的倒数,是真实相互作用的下限(如果)或上限(如果)。此外,通过检查其他特征,如暴露流行率、暴露主要效应的强度以及回忆偏倚和基因-环境依赖性的方向,偏倚幅度在一定程度上是可预测的。

结论

即使存在基因-环境依赖性,即使存在分类偏倚,我们也可能仍然能够识别基因-环境相互作用。

相似文献

1
Misclassification Bias in the Assessment of Gene-by-Environment Interactions.基因-环境交互作用评估中的分类偏差。
Epidemiology. 2023 Sep 1;34(5):673-680. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001635. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Sexual Harassment and Prevention Training性骚扰与预防培训
6
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
7
Selenium for preventing cancer.硒预防癌症。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 29;1(1):CD005195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005195.pub4.
8
Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco.用于改变食品、酒精饮料和烟草的选择及消费量的份量、包装或餐具尺寸。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Sep 14;2015(9):CD011045. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011045.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
The Lived Experience of Autistic Adults in Employment: A Systematic Search and Synthesis.成年自闭症患者的就业生活经历:系统检索与综述
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Dec 2;6(4):495-509. doi: 10.1089/aut.2022.0114. eCollection 2024 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of a Gene-Environment Interaction of and Low-Level Nerve Agent Exposure with Gulf War Illness: A Prevalence Case-Control Study Drawn from the U.S. Military Health Survey's National Population Sample.评估遗传-环境相互作用与低水平神经毒剂接触对海湾战争疾病的影响:一项来自美国军事健康调查全国人口样本的患病率病例对照研究。
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 May;130(5):57001. doi: 10.1289/EHP9009. Epub 2022 May 11.
2
Invited Perspective: Causal Implications of Gene by Environment Studies Applied to Gulf War Illness.特邀观点:基因与环境研究对海湾战争综合症的因果影响
Environ Health Perspect. 2022 May;130(5):51301. doi: 10.1289/EHP11057. Epub 2022 May 11.
3
Modern Epidemiology, 4th edition. TL Lash, TJ VanderWeele, S Haneuse, KJ Rothman. Wolters Kluwer, 2021.
《现代流行病学》第4版。TL·拉什、TJ·范德韦勒、S·哈内斯、KJ·罗斯曼著。沃尔特斯·克鲁维尔出版社,2021年。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2021 Aug;36(8):767-768. doi: 10.1007/s10654-021-00778-w. Epub 2021 Jul 3.
4
Current Challenges and New Opportunities for Gene-Environment Interaction Studies of Complex Diseases.复杂疾病基因-环境相互作用研究的当前挑战与新机遇
Am J Epidemiol. 2017 Oct 1;186(7):753-761. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwx227.
5
Environmental confounding in gene-environment interaction studies.基因-环境交互作用研究中的环境混杂。
Am J Epidemiol. 2013 Jul 1;178(1):144-52. doi: 10.1093/aje/kws439. Epub 2013 May 21.
6
Sensitivity analysis for interactions under unmeasured confounding.在存在未测量混杂因素的情况下进行交互作用的敏感性分析。
Stat Med. 2012 Sep 28;31(22):2552-64. doi: 10.1002/sim.4354. Epub 2011 Oct 4.
7
The impact of gene-environment dependence and misclassification in genetic association studies incorporating gene-environment interactions.纳入基因-环境相互作用的遗传关联研究中基因-环境依赖性和错误分类的影响。
Hum Hered. 2009;68(3):171-81. doi: 10.1159/000224637. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
8
The challenges of exposure assessment in health studies of Gulf War veterans.海湾战争退伍军人健康研究中暴露评估的挑战。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 29;361(1468):627-37. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.1822.
9
Evaluating bias due to population stratification in epidemiologic studies of gene-gene or gene-environment interactions.在基因-基因或基因-环境相互作用的流行病学研究中评估人群分层导致的偏倚。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):124-32. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0304.
10
Gene-environment interactions in human diseases.人类疾病中的基因-环境相互作用。
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Apr;6(4):287-98. doi: 10.1038/nrg1578.