From the Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia Mailman School of Public Health.
Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California San Diego.
Epidemiology. 2023 Sep 1;34(5):700-711. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001634. Epub 2023 May 26.
People using electricity-dependent durable medical equipment (DME) may be vulnerable to health effects from wildfire smoke, residence near wildfires, or residence in evacuation zones. To our knowledge, no studies have examined their healthcare utilization during wildfires.
We obtained 2016-2020 counts of residential Zip Code Tabulation Area (ZCTA) level outpatient, emergency department (ED), and inpatient visits made by DME-using Kaiser Permanente Southern California members 45+. We linked counts to daily ZCTA-level wildfire particulate matter (PM) 2.5 and wildfire boundary and evacuation data from the 2018 Woolsey and 2019 Getty wildfires. We estimated the association of lagged (up to 7 days) wildfire PM 2.5 and residence near a fire or in an evacuation zone and healthcare visit frequency with negative binomial and difference-in-differences models.
Among 236,732 DME users, 10 µg/m 3 increases in wildfire PM 2.5 concentration were associated with the reduced rate (RR = 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99) of all-cause outpatient visits 1 day after exposure and increased rate on 4 of 5 subsequent days (RR range 1.03-1.12). Woolsey Fire proximity (<20 km) was associated with reduced all-cause outpatient visits, whereas evacuation and proximity were associated with increased inpatient cardiorespiratory visits (proximity RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.99, 2.12, evacuation RR = 1.72; 95% CI = 1.00, 2.96). Neither Getty Fire proximity nor evacuation was associated with healthcare visit frequency.
Our results support the hypothesis that wildfire smoke or proximity interrupts DME users' routine outpatient care, via sheltering in place. However, wildfire exposures were also associated with increased urgent healthcare utilization in this vulnerable group.
使用依赖电力的耐用医疗设备(DME)的人可能容易受到野火烟雾、居住在野火附近或居住在疏散区的健康影响。据我们所知,尚无研究探讨他们在野火期间的医疗保健利用情况。
我们获得了 2016-2020 年 Kaiser Permanente 南加州 45 岁以上使用 DME 的会员在门诊、急诊部(ED)和住院的按邮政编码区(ZCTA)级别的就诊次数。我们将这些次数与 2018 年 Woolsey 和 2019 年 Getty 野火的每日 ZCTA 级野火细颗粒物(PM)2.5 和野火边界及疏散数据进行了关联。我们使用负二项式和差分差异模型来估计滞后(最多 7 天)野火 PM 2.5 和居住在火灾附近或疏散区与医疗就诊频率的关联。
在 236732 名 DME 用户中,野火 PM 2.5 浓度每增加 10 µg/m 3,与暴露后第 1 天全因门诊就诊率降低(RR=0.96;95%置信区间[CI]为 0.94,0.99)和随后 5 天中的 4 天就诊率增加(RR 范围为 1.03-1.12)相关。Woolsey 火灾临近(<20 公里)与全因门诊就诊减少相关,而疏散和临近与住院心肺就诊增加相关(临近 RR=1.45;95%CI=0.99,2.12,疏散 RR=1.72;95%CI=1.00,2.96)。Getty 火灾临近或疏散与医疗就诊频率均无关联。
我们的结果支持这样一种假设,即野火烟雾或临近会通过就地避难中断 DME 用户的常规门诊护理。然而,在这个弱势群体中,野火暴露也与紧急医疗保健利用的增加有关。