• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ADCC 的改善目标一致护理计划:实施主要姑息治疗原则。

ADCC's Improving Goal Concordant Care Initiative: Implementing Primary Palliative Care Principles.

机构信息

Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Division of Oncology (E.T.L.), University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chair Dept Supportive & Palliative Care (A.A.C.), Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e283-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.008
PMID:37257523
Abstract

BACKGROUND

High-quality, timely goals of care communication (GOCC) may improve patient and caregiver outcomes and promote care that is consistent with patient preferences.

PROBLEM

Cancer patients, and their loved ones, appreciate GOCC; however, oncologists often lack formal communication training, institutional support and structures necessary to promote the delivery, documentation, and longitudinal follow-up of GOCC.

PROPOSED SOLUTION

The Alliance of Dedicated Cancer Centers (ADCC), representing 10 U.S. academic cancer hospitals, undertook the Improving Goal Concordant Care Initiative (IGCC). This national, 3-year implementation initiative was designed in Fall 2019 by a workgroup of quality, oncology, and palliative care leaders, as well as patient and family advisory committee members (PFAC). IGCC addresses systemic gaps by requiring four core components for participation: 1) Implementation of a formal communication skills training (CST) program, 2) Structured GOCC documentation in the electronic medical record that is visible to all clinicians, 3) Expectations regarding the timing and patient populations for GOCC, and 4) Implementation of a measurement framework.

METHOD

Dyads of palliative and oncology leaders committed to attend regularly scheduled, ADCC-led, virtual meetings during the design and implementation phase, incorporating PFAC feedback at every stage. Using the RE-AIM framework, we describe process and outcome evaluation measures defined by implementation and measures workgroups and collected routinely, including: CST completion; trainee evaluation response rate, trainee-reported quality of CST, trainee changes in self-efficacy and distress; percent of high-priority patients participating in GOCC, and patient-reported response to the "Heard and Understood" scale (HU). IGCC's impact will be assessed using claims-based utilization metrics near the end of life (EOLM) and followed longitudinally. Qualitative evaluations near the completion of IGCC will provide insight into perceived barriers, enabling factors, and sustainability.

OUTCOMES

Implementation of all IGCC components has begun at all sites. ADCC-wide, 35% of MD/DOs have completed CST (range by site: 8%-100%). CST is highly rated; in Quarter 3, 2022, 93%-100%, 90%-100% and 87%-100% of respondents reported above average to excellent CST quality, likelihood to use the skills and likelihood to recommend CST to others, respectively. Clinician self-efficacy and distress ratings are expected in late 2023. All sites have identified patient populations and continue to refine automated triggers and timelines; uptake of GOCC documentation has been slow. Eight of 10 sites have submitted patient-reported HU data. EOLM data are expected for all sites in early 2024.

LESSONS LEARNED

Flexibility in implementation with shared definitions, measures, and learnings about approaches optimizes the ability of all centers to collaborate and make progress in improving GOCC. Flexibility adds to the complexity of understanding intervention effectiveness, the critical intervention components and the fidelity necessary to achieve specific outcomes.

摘要

背景

高质量、及时的医疗目标沟通(GOCC)可能会改善患者和护理人员的预后,并促进符合患者偏好的护理。

问题

癌症患者及其家属喜欢 GOCC;然而,肿瘤医生通常缺乏正式的沟通培训、机构支持和必要的结构,无法促进 GOCC 的提供、记录和纵向随访。

建议的解决方案

代表 10 家美国学术癌症医院的专注癌症中心联盟(ADCC)开展了改善目标一致护理倡议(IGCC)。这个全国性的、为期 3 年的实施计划是由质量、肿瘤学和姑息治疗领域的领导者以及患者和家庭咨询委员会成员(PFAC)的工作组在 2019 年秋季设计的。IGCC 通过要求参与的四项核心组成部分来解决系统差距:1)实施正式的沟通技巧培训(CST)计划,2)在电子病历中对 GOCC 进行结构化记录,以便所有临床医生都能看到,3)对 GOCC 的时间安排和患者人群的期望,以及 4)实施衡量框架。

方法

致力于在设计和实施阶段定期参加由 ADCC 领导的虚拟会议的姑息治疗和肿瘤学领导二人组,在每个阶段都纳入 PFAC 的反馈。我们使用 RE-AIM 框架描述了由实施和衡量工作组定义的过程和结果评估措施,并定期收集,包括:CST 完成情况;学员评估回复率、学员报告的 CST 质量、学员自我效能感和焦虑感的变化;参与 GOCC 的高优先级患者的百分比,以及患者对“被听到和理解”量表(HU)的反应。IGCC 的影响将在接近生命末期(EOLM)时使用基于索赔的利用指标进行评估,并进行纵向跟踪。接近 IGCC 完成时的定性评估将提供对感知到的障碍、促成因素和可持续性的洞察。

结果

所有 IGCC 组件的实施都已在所有站点开始。ADCC 范围内,35%的医生已经完成了 CST(按站点范围:8%-100%)。CST 的评价很高;在 2022 年第三季度,93%-100%、90%-100%和 87%-100%的受访者分别报告 CST 质量高于平均水平、极有可能使用这些技能以及极有可能向他人推荐 CST。预计在 2023 年末会有临床医生自我效能感和焦虑感的评估。所有站点都确定了患者人群,并继续完善自动触发和时间安排;GOCC 记录的采用速度较慢。10 个站点中有 8 个提交了患者报告的 HU 数据。预计所有站点的 EOLM 数据将于 2024 年初提交。

经验教训

实施过程中的灵活性,包括共享定义、措施和对最佳方法的了解,优化了所有中心在改善 GOCC 方面合作和取得进展的能力。灵活性增加了理解干预效果、关键干预因素和实现特定结果所需的保真度的复杂性。

相似文献

1
ADCC's Improving Goal Concordant Care Initiative: Implementing Primary Palliative Care Principles.ADCC 的改善目标一致护理计划:实施主要姑息治疗原则。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Aug;66(2):e283-e297. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.05.008. Epub 2023 May 30.
2
The VA Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Initiative: A qualitative analysis of veterans with advanced kidney disease.VA 生命维持治疗决策倡议:晚期肾病退伍军人的定性分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Sep;70(9):2517-2529. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17807. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Goals of care communication and higher-value care for patients with advanced-stage cancer: A systematic review of the evidence.晚期癌症患者的照护目标沟通和高价值照护:系统评价证据。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 May;105(5):1138-1151. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2021.08.016. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Oncology clinicians' defenses and adherence to communication skills training with simulated patients: an exploratory study.肿瘤临床医生对模拟患者沟通技巧培训的抵触与依从性:一项探索性研究。
J Cancer Educ. 2012 Jun;27(3):399-403. doi: 10.1007/s13187-012-0366-8.
6
7
The First National Pain Medicine Summit--final summary report.第一届全国疼痛医学峰会——最终总结报告。
Pain Med. 2010 Oct;11(10):1447-68. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00961.x.
8
The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.美国国家癌症研究所全爱尔兰癌症会议。
Oncologist. 1999;4(4):275-277.
9
Effectiveness of online communication skills training for cancer and palliative care health professionals: A systematic review.在线沟通技巧培训对癌症和姑息治疗卫生专业人员的效果:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2021 Sep;30(9):1405-1419. doi: 10.1002/pon.5702. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
10
Peer-professional workgroups in palliative care: a strategy for advancing professional discourse and practice.姑息治疗中的同行专业工作组:推进专业话语与实践的策略
J Palliat Med. 2006 Aug;9(4):934-47. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.934.

引用本文的文献

1
Harnessing Natural Language Processing to Assess Quality of End-of-Life Care for Children With Cancer.利用自然语言处理评估癌症儿童临终关怀质量。
JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2024 Sep;8:e2400134. doi: 10.1200/CCI.24.00134.
2
Impact of an Institution-Wide Goals of Care Program on the Timing of Referrals to Outpatient Palliative Care.全院目标关怀计划对门诊姑息治疗转介时间的影响。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 Dec;66(6):e666-e671. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.08.019. Epub 2023 Aug 27.