• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

西普罗夫与异丙酚用于胃肠内镜镇静:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai East Hospital, Shanghai, China.

The First Clinical Medical College, Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e071438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438
PMID:37258073
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10255017/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Painless gastrointestinal endoscopy is being increasingly practised in the clinical field. The management and choice of sedation are important during the endoscopy procedure to reduce patient discomfort and facilitate high disease detection rates. Ciprofol is principally an agonist of the γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptor; it comprises the active ingredient HSK3486, which is similar to the currently used intravenous anaesthetic propofol in clinical practice. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing ciprofol and propofol will be conducted to assess their efficacy and safety during endoscopy. Before starting the study, we describe the specific protocol of this systematic review.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This protocol was prepared in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols 2015. The following databases will be searched: Embase, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Biomedical Literature Service System, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, China Science and Technology Journal Database and a clinical trial registry. The database search strategy will adopt a combination of subject words and free words. Randomised controlled trials related to ciprofol use for sedation during gastrointestinal endoscopy will also be included. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, two researchers will independently screen the articles and extracted data. Following the qualitative evaluation of each study, analysis will be conducted using Review Manager software.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol for this systematic review and meta-analysis involves no individual patient data; thus, ethical approval is not required. This will be the first meta-analysis to assess the sedation efficacy of ciprofol and provide evidence to clinicians for decision-making. The results will be disseminated through conference presentations and publications in peer-review journals related to this field.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022370047.

摘要

简介

无痛胃肠内镜在临床领域的应用越来越广泛。在内镜检查过程中,管理和选择镇静剂对于减轻患者不适和提高疾病检出率非常重要。Ciprofol 主要是γ-氨基丁酸 A 型受体激动剂;它包含 HSK3486 作为活性成分,与目前临床实践中使用的静脉麻醉药丙泊酚相似。我们将进行一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较 Ciprofol 和丙泊酚在内镜检查中的疗效和安全性。在开始研究之前,我们将描述本系统评价的具体方案。

方法和分析

本方案按照 2015 年《系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目》的要求制定。将检索以下数据库:Embase、Cochrane 图书馆、PubMed、Web of Science、中国生物医学文献服务系统、中国国家知识基础设施、万方数据库、中国科技期刊数据库和临床试验注册库。数据库搜索策略将采用主题词和自由词相结合的方式。还将纳入有关 Ciprofol 用于胃肠内镜镇静的随机对照试验。根据纳入和排除标准,两名研究人员将独立筛选文章并提取数据。在对每个研究进行定性评估后,将使用 Review Manager 软件进行分析。

伦理和传播

本系统评价和荟萃分析方案不涉及个体患者数据,因此不需要伦理批准。这将是第一项评估 Ciprofol 镇静效果的荟萃分析,并为临床医生提供决策依据。结果将通过会议演示和发表在与该领域相关的同行评议期刊上进行传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022370047。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e0/10255017/7938866b9c2c/bmjopen-2022-071438f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e0/10255017/7938866b9c2c/bmjopen-2022-071438f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/38e0/10255017/7938866b9c2c/bmjopen-2022-071438f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Ciprofol versus propofol for sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.西普罗夫与异丙酚用于胃肠内镜镇静:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 31;13(5):e071438. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071438.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The efficacy of ciprofol versus propofol on anesthesia in patients undergoing endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.西普罗酚与异丙酚用于内镜检查患者麻醉的疗效:系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Oct 8;24(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02721-4.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for anesthetic induction and non-ICU sedation.一项比较环泊酚(HSK3486)与丙泊酚用于麻醉诱导和非重症监护病房镇静的疗效和安全性的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Sep 25;14:1225288. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1225288. eCollection 2023.
5
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.环泊酚与丙泊酚用于全身麻醉诱导或镇静的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Sep;68(9):776-794. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_104_24. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
6
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol (HSK3486) for procedural sedation and anesthesia induction in surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.环丙泊酚(HSK3486)用于外科手术患者程序性镇静和麻醉诱导的有效性与安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Heliyon. 2023 Nov 26;9(12):e22634. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22634. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in sedating patients in the operating room and outside the operating room: a meta-analysis and systematic review.比较西普罗和丙泊酚在手术室和手术室外镇静患者的疗效和安全性:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jul 2;24(1):218. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02609-3.
8
Effects of arsenic trioxide combined with platinum drugs in treatment of cervical cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.三氧化二砷联合铂类药物治疗宫颈癌的效果:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Nov 6;99(45):e22950. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022950.
9
The Comparison of Midazolam and Propofol in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.咪达唑仑与丙泊酚在胃肠内镜检查中的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018 Jun;28(3):153-158. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000532.
10
Efficacy and safety of Chinese medicines for vitreous hemorrhage: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.中药治疗玻璃体积血的疗效与安全性:系统评价与Meta分析方案
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 May;99(19):e20086. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000020086.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscope: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT).环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查患者麻醉的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验(RCT)的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Jul 19;25(1):354. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-03079-x.
2
The novel ciprofol versus propofol during gastroenteroscopy in Chinese patients: a meta-analysis.中国患者在胃镜检查期间新型环丙泊酚与丙泊酚的对比:一项荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 25;12:1598268. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1598268. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia.无痛胃肠镜麻醉中患者术中不良反应、手术、复苏以及满意度比较及西普罗和丙泊酚的临床价值。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Jul 18;2022:9541060. doi: 10.1155/2022/9541060. eCollection 2022.
2
Efficacy and Safety of Deep Sedation and Anaesthesia for Complex Endoscopic Procedures-A Narrative Review.深度镇静和麻醉用于复杂内镜手术的疗效与安全性:一项叙述性综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Jun 22;12(7):1523. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12071523.
3
Ciprofol Versus Propofol for Sedation in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis in a Chinese Population.
环丙泊酚与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查镇静的比较:一项中国人群的系统评价和荟萃分析
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Jun 25;19:5369-5385. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S522678. eCollection 2025.
4
Enhanced hemodynamic stability and patient satisfaction with ciprofol-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil for sedation in shorter-duration fiberoptic bronchoscopy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.在短时间纤维支气管镜检查中,与丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼相比,环丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼用于镇静可增强血流动力学稳定性并提高患者满意度:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 May 19;12:1498010. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1498010. eCollection 2025.
5
The Median Effective Dose of Ciprofol Combined with Sufentanil for Inhibiting Responses to Gastroscope Insertion in Obese Patients: A Prospective, Single-Center Study.丙泊酚联合舒芬太尼抑制肥胖患者胃镜插入反应的半数有效剂量:一项前瞻性单中心研究
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 May 1;19:3577-3587. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S494972. eCollection 2025.
6
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for gastroscopy in patients with obesity: a randomised clinical controlled trial using different weight-based dosing scales.环丙泊酚用于肥胖患者胃镜检查的有效性和安全性:一项使用不同体重给药量表的随机临床对照试验
BMC Anesthesiol. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12871-025-02974-7.
7
Efficacy and safety of remimazolam besylate and ciprofol in painless gastrointestinal endoscopy in the elderly.苯磺酸瑞马唑仑与环泊酚用于老年患者无痛胃肠镜检查的有效性和安全性
Acta Cir Bras. 2024 Dec 16;39:e399324. doi: 10.1590/acb399324. eCollection 2024.
8
ED50 of ciprofol combined with sufentanil for fiberoptic bronchoscopy of different patient populations with pulmonary tuberculosis.不同肺结核患者人群行纤维支气管镜检查时,丙泊酚复合舒芬太尼的 ED50。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Jun 4;24(1):197. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02583-w.
9
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.环泊酚与丙泊酚用于全身麻醉诱导和维持的有效性及安全性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2024 Apr 11;4(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s44158-024-00160-8.
Comparison of ciprofol (HSK3486) versus propofol for the induction of deep sedation during gastroscopy and colonoscopy procedures: A multi-centre, non-inferiority, randomized, controlled phase 3 clinical trial.
比较西普鲁福(HSK3486)与异丙酚用于胃镜和结肠镜检查中深度镇静诱导的效果:一项多中心、非劣效性、随机、对照 3 期临床试验。
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2022 Aug;131(2):138-148. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.13761. Epub 2022 Jun 10.
4
Effectiveness of acupuncture therapy for preventing emergence agitation in children: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.针灸疗法预防儿童苏醒期躁动的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析方案,采用试验序贯分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 29;17(3):e0264197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264197. eCollection 2022.
5
Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of HSK3486, a Novel 2,6-Disubstituted Phenol Derivative as a General Anesthetic.新型2,6-二取代苯酚衍生物HSK3486作为全身麻醉药的药效学和药代动力学
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Feb 3;13:830791. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.830791. eCollection 2022.
6
Sedation Effects Produced by a Ciprofol Initial Infusion or Bolus Dose Followed by Continuous Maintenance Infusion in Healthy Subjects: A Phase 1 Trial.健康受试者中,采用 Ciprofol 起始输注或推注剂量,随后持续输注维持剂量产生的镇静作用:一项 1 期试验。
Adv Ther. 2021 Nov;38(11):5484-5500. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01914-4. Epub 2021 Sep 24.
7
Efficacy and safety of ciprofol for the sedation/anesthesia in patients undergoing colonoscopy: Phase IIa and IIb multi-center clinical trials.西普罗尔在结肠镜检查镇静/麻醉中的疗效和安全性:Ⅱa 期和Ⅱb 期多中心临床试验。
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2021 Sep 1;164:105904. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2021.105904. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
8
Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis.在荟萃分析中根据常见报告的分位数估计样本均值和标准差。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2020 Sep;29(9):2520-2537. doi: 10.1177/0962280219889080. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
9
Dexmedetomidine vs propofol for gastrointestinal endoscopy: A meta-analysis.右美托咪定与丙泊酚用于胃肠内镜检查:一项荟萃分析。
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Nov;5(7):1037-1045. doi: 10.1177/2050640616688140. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
10
Sedation for routine gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a review on efficacy, safety, efficiency, cost and satisfaction.常规胃肠道内镜检查的镇静:疗效、安全性、效率、成本及满意度综述
Intest Res. 2017 Oct;15(4):456-466. doi: 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.456. Epub 2017 Oct 23.