• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当恐惧破坏自主性时,我们欠患者什么:具体化的情感和无法深思熟虑。

What we owe patients when fear undermines autonomy: Concretized emotions and the incapacity to deliberate.

机构信息

School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;29(8):1251-1260. doi: 10.1111/jep.13864. Epub 2023 May 31.

DOI:10.1111/jep.13864
PMID:37259233
Abstract

Fear and anxiety can interfere profoundly with a person's ability to deliberate. Patients sometimes face critical medical decisions while subject to intense emotions which involve catastrophic (or wishful) convictions about the future. Medical teams, and even psychiatrists and bioethicists, lack a model for what to do in such cases. Philosophical accounts of autonomy and the clinical criteria for decision-making capacity derived from them fail to address cases in which emotions do not merely skew judgment but rather block decision-making capacity itself. This paper provides an account of when emotions undermine a person's freedom to deliberate, which is the basis of the capacity for autonomy. People subject to what I call 'concretized emotions' meet the cognitive criteria for decision-making capacity. Yet their emotions dictate their views of reality and prevent them from meeting the basic conditions for deliberation. To deliberate one needs to be able to think through alternatives, and this thinking through alternatives needs to be responsive to evidence. With concretized fear, both the ability to think through alternatives and the ability to respond cognitively to evidence is undermined. The person can engage in apparent deliberation, but her thought processes regarding the feared matter are characterized by the rigid view that things are just as they seem from her emotional view. This paper develops a theoretical and clinical model for a more appropriate and nuanced approach to acting responsibly toward patients subject to intense fear and related emotional states that block their decision-making capacity.

摘要

恐惧和焦虑会极大地干扰一个人进行深思熟虑的能力。患者在面对重大医疗决策时,往往会受到强烈情绪的影响,这些情绪涉及对未来的灾难性(或一厢情愿的)信念。医疗团队,甚至精神科医生和生物伦理学家,都缺乏处理此类情况的模型。自主的哲学解释和由此衍生的决策能力的临床标准都没有解决情绪不仅会扭曲判断,而且会阻碍决策能力本身的情况。本文提供了一种解释,说明情绪何时会破坏一个人深思熟虑的自由,这是自主性能力的基础。人们受到我所说的“具体化情绪”的影响,符合决策能力的认知标准。然而,他们的情绪决定了他们对现实的看法,并使他们无法满足深思熟虑的基本条件。要进行深思熟虑,人们需要能够思考各种选择,而这种对各种选择的思考需要对证据做出反应。在具体化的恐惧中,人们思考各种选择的能力和对证据进行认知反应的能力都会受到损害。这个人可以进行表面上的深思熟虑,但她对恐惧问题的思考过程的特点是,她从情绪角度看待问题时,会固执地认为事情就是她所看到的那样。本文为处理受强烈恐惧和相关情绪状态影响而阻碍其决策能力的患者,提供了一种更恰当、更细致的方法,制定了一个理论和临床模型。

相似文献

1
What we owe patients when fear undermines autonomy: Concretized emotions and the incapacity to deliberate.当恐惧破坏自主性时,我们欠患者什么:具体化的情感和无法深思熟虑。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;29(8):1251-1260. doi: 10.1111/jep.13864. Epub 2023 May 31.
2
When concretized emotion-belief complexes derail decision-making capacity.当具体的情感-信仰复合体干扰决策能力时。
Bioethics. 2012 Feb;26(2):108-16. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01817.x. Epub 2010 May 17.
3
The philosophical moment of the medical decision: revisiting emotions felt, to improve ethics of future decisions.医疗决策的哲学时刻:重温所感受到的情感,以提升未来决策的伦理水平。
J Med Ethics. 2007 Aug;33(8):470-2. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.016741.
4
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
5
Sadder but wiser or happier and smarter? A demonstration of judgment and decision making.更悲伤但更明智,还是更快乐且更聪明?判断与决策的一个例证。
J Psychol. 2007 Jan;141(1):63-76. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.141.1.63-76.
6
Fear shapes information acquisition in decisions from experience.恐惧影响基于经验的决策中的信息获取。
Cognition. 2014 Jul;132(1):90-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.009. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
7
Counterfactual Thought.反事实思维。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2016;67:135-57. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033249. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
8
The place for emotions in professional carers' thinking: reflections on two cases.情感在专业护理人员思维中的位置:对两个案例的思考
Med Law. 2010 Dec;29(4):537-46.
9
[Justice and equity as determinants of medical decision-making].[作为医学决策决定因素的正义与公平]
Arch Pediatr. 2010 Feb;17 Suppl 1:S32-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-693X(10)70006-3.
10
Assessment of unconscious decision aids applied to complex patient-centered medical decisions.应用于以患者为中心的复杂医疗决策的无意识决策辅助工具评估。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Feb 5;17(2):e37. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3739.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-injury and the treatment gap: An interdisciplinary exploration of beliefs about causal variables and treatment goals among caregivers, researchers, and clinicians.自我伤害与治疗差距:护理人员、研究人员和临床医生对因果变量及治疗目标的信念的跨学科探索
J Ment Health Res Intellect Disabil. 2025;18(3):280-300. doi: 10.1080/19315864.2024.2424744. Epub 2024 Nov 4.