Hypertension Excellence Center, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Hopital Saint André, Bordeaux.
University of Paris, Paris, France.
J Hypertens. 2023 Jul 1;41(7):1168-1174. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000003446. Epub 2023 Apr 17.
Arterial stiffness, an important predictor of cardiovascular event, has two components: one linked to the nonlinear elastic behaviour of the arterial wall and dependent of the blood pressure (BP) at the time of measurement, and the other linked to the structural modifications of the arterial wall as the consequences of the long-term effects of all cardiovascular risk factors, including BP. This second component is certainly the most important one and can be assessed with 24-h ambulatory monitoring of cardio-arm pulse transmission time (QKD method).
The working hypothesis of this study is that QKD100-60, the value of the QKD for a 100 mmHg SBP and 60 bpm heart rate is independent of 24-h SBP in both normotensive volunteers and treated hypertensive patients, in whom the long-term influence of BP is limited, whereas QKD100-60 is not independent of 24-h SBP in untreated hypertensive patients in whom high BP was able to damage the arterial wall on the long term. So we studied the relationships of QKD100-60 with 24-h BP and heart rate together with age, sex, height in multivariate regression analysis in three groups of patients; normal, untreated and treated hypertensive patients. QKD was measured with Novacor devices.
In the normal population (n = 323, aged 29 ± 10 years) and in the treated hypertensive population (n = 425, aged 58 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was indeed not significantly related to 24-h SBP. In the untreated hypertensive population (n = 614, aged 51 ± 13 years) the QKD100-60 was weakly but significantly related to 24-h SBP (r = 0.249, P < 0.0001).
Ambulatory monitoring of QKD provides indices of arterial stiffness independent of BP level at the time of measurement and most interestingly of 24-h BP with the potential to refine risk in patients with low traditional risk scores.
动脉僵硬度是心血管事件的一个重要预测指标,它有两个组成部分:一个与动脉壁的非线性弹性行为有关,取决于测量时的血压(BP),另一个与动脉壁的结构改变有关,这是所有心血管危险因素长期作用的结果,包括 BP。第二个组成部分是最重要的,它可以通过 24 小时动态监测心臂脉搏传输时间(QKD 法)来评估。
本研究的工作假设是,对于血压为 100mmHg 的收缩压和 60 次/分钟的心率,QKD100-60 值独立于正常志愿者和接受治疗的高血压患者的 24 小时收缩压,在这些患者中,BP 的长期影响是有限的,而在未经治疗的高血压患者中,QKD100-60 与 24 小时收缩压不独立,因为长期的高血压会损害动脉壁。因此,我们在正常人群(n=323,年龄 29±10 岁)、未经治疗的高血压患者(n=614,年龄 51±13 岁)和接受治疗的高血压患者(n=425,年龄 58±13 岁)中,使用 Novacor 设备,通过多元回归分析研究了 QKD100-60 与 24 小时 BP 和心率以及年龄、性别、身高的关系。
在正常人群(n=323,年龄 29±10 岁)和接受治疗的高血压人群(n=425,年龄 58±13 岁)中,QKD100-60 与 24 小时收缩压之间的关系并不显著。在未经治疗的高血压患者(n=614,年龄 51±13 岁)中,QKD100-60 与 24 小时收缩压之间存在微弱但显著的相关性(r=0.249,P<0.0001)。
QKD 的 24 小时动态监测提供了独立于测量时血压水平的动脉僵硬度指标,更有趣的是,它还提供了 24 小时血压的指标,有可能提高低传统风险评分患者的风险。