Ormerod Emma, Ali Khalid, Cameron James, Malik Muzaffar, Lee Richard, Getov Spas, Rajkumar Chakravarthi
Department of Medicine, Bristol University Hospitals NHS Trust, Bristol, United Kingdom; Academic Department of Geriatrics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Academic Department of Geriatrics, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2017 Nov;26(11):2541-2546. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.05.043. Epub 2017 Jul 3.
Vascular compliance is emerging as a useful cardiovascular risk factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between arterial stiffness and stroke severity at presentation and 3 weeks.
Forty two patients with acute ischemic stroke (55% male, mean age 71 years) were recruited over 15-months. Stroke subtypes were classified into lacunar circulation infarct (LACI), partial anterior circulation infarct (PACI), and posterior circulation infarct (POCI). Arterial stiffness was measured by QKD (defined as the time interval between the appearance of the Q wave [Q] on the ECG and the arrival of the diastolic Korotkoff [K] sound over the brachial artery in diastole [D]; QKD It is measured in milliseconds) using 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and electrocardiogram monitoring. The measured QKD values were then corrected for a heart rate of 60 bpm and a systolic BP of 100 mm Hg (QKD). Stroke severity was assessed on admission and at 3 weeks using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
Regression analysis for all patients showed a weak non-significant correlation between arterial stiffness and stroke severity. However, on performing subgroup analysis using Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) classification, we found that in large-artery atherosclerosis, arterial stiffness predicted stroke severity significantly at baseline (r = .45, b = .093, P = .04), but not significant for cardio embolism or small-artery occlusion subtypes. QKD and stroke severity were not significantly associated in week 3. There was no difference in NIHSS scores at weeks 0 and 3, or in QKD between LACI, PACI, and POCI, or dipper versus non-dippers and reverse dippers.
Further research is needed to explore the association between QKD and stroke severity.
血管顺应性正逐渐成为一种有用的心血管危险因素。本研究的目的是调查发病时及3周时动脉僵硬度与卒中严重程度之间的关联。
在15个月内招募了42例急性缺血性卒中患者(男性占55%,平均年龄71岁)。卒中亚型分为腔隙性脑梗死(LACI)、部分前循环梗死(PACI)和后循环梗死(POCI)。使用24小时动态血压和心电图监测,通过QKD测量动脉僵硬度(定义为心电图上Q波出现[Q]与舒张期肱动脉上舒张期柯氏音[K]到达之间的时间间隔[D];QKD以毫秒为单位测量)。然后将测量的QKD值校正为心率60次/分和收缩压100 mmHg时的值(QKD)。使用美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)在入院时和3周时评估卒中严重程度。
对所有患者的回归分析显示,动脉僵硬度与卒中严重程度之间存在微弱的非显著相关性。然而,在使用急性卒中治疗中Org 10172试验(TOAST)分类进行亚组分析时,我们发现,在大动脉粥样硬化中,动脉僵硬度在基线时显著预测卒中严重程度(r = 0.45,b = 0.093,P = 0.04),但对心源性栓塞或小动脉闭塞亚型不显著。第3周时QKD与卒中严重程度无显著关联。第0周和第3周时NIHSS评分无差异,LACI、PACI和POCI之间的QKD无差异,勺型血压者与非勺型血压者及反勺型血压者之间的QKD也无差异。
需要进一步研究来探讨QKD与卒中严重程度之间的关联。