Suppr超能文献

动态血压监测能否提供可靠的动脉僵硬度指标?

Can ambulatory blood-pressure monitoring provide reliable indices of arterial stiffness?

作者信息

Gosse Philippe, Papaioanou Georgios, Coulon Paul, Reuter Sylvain, Lemetayer Philippe, Safar Michel

机构信息

Hypertension Unit, Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 2007 Aug;20(8):831-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amjhyper.2007.03.003.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The use of ambulatory recordings of blood pressure (BP) was proposed to estimate arterial stiffness (AS). We compared the relative value of the ambulatory AS index (AASI), and of the slope of pulse pressure (PP) according to mean BP (MBP) obtained from 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, to the monitoring of the arrival time of Korotkoff sounds (QKD interval) in the prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events.

METHODS

Twenty-four-hour ambulatory BP and QKD monitoring were recorded at baseline, before antihypertensive treatment of hypertensive patients in our Bordeaux cohort. From these recordings, the AASI, the PP/MBP slope, and the theoretical value of the QKD for a systolic pressure of 100 mm Hg and a heart rate of 60 beats/min (QKD100-60) were calculated. The patients were then given antihypertensive treatment and followed by their family physicians, who were unaware of the QKD, AASI, and PP/MBP slope results. Regular updates on patients were obtained. The reproducibility of measurements was studied in 38 normal subjects evaluated on two occasions.

RESULTS

The reproducibility of the AASI and the PP/MBP slope was less than that of BP over 24 h and of QKD100-60. The cohort comprised 469 patients. With an average follow-up of 70+/-39 months, 62 CV complications, including 13 deaths, were recorded. In the monovariate analysis, age, PP over 24 h, QKD100-60, AASI, and the PP/MBP slope were significantly related to the occurrence of complications. In the multivariate analysis, when age and PP over 24 were included in the model, only QKD100-60 remained significantly linked to CV events.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support the value of the AASI as an indirect estimate of AS and as an element in the evaluation of CV risk in hypertensive patients. However, the reproducibility of this index is less, and its predictive value for complications is poorer, than that of QKD100-60, a parameter that we believe is more closely linked to AS.

摘要

背景

有人提出采用动态血压记录来评估动脉僵硬度(AS)。我们比较了动态AS指数(AASI)以及根据24小时动态血压监测得出的脉压(PP)随平均血压(MBP)变化的斜率,与柯氏音到达时间(QKD间期)监测在预测心血管(CV)事件方面的相对价值。

方法

在我们波尔多队列中,对高血压患者进行抗高血压治疗前,于基线时记录24小时动态血压和QKD监测数据。根据这些记录,计算AASI、PP/MBP斜率以及收缩压为100 mmHg且心率为60次/分钟时的QKD理论值(QKD100 - 60)。随后对患者进行抗高血压治疗,并由其家庭医生进行随访,这些医生并不知晓QKD、AASI和PP/MBP斜率的结果。定期获取患者的最新情况。在38名接受两次评估的正常受试者中研究了测量的可重复性。

结果

AASI和PP/MBP斜率的可重复性低于24小时血压和QKD100 - 60的可重复性。该队列包括469名患者。平均随访70±39个月,记录到62例CV并发症,包括13例死亡。在单变量分析中,年龄、24小时PP、QKD100 - 60、AASI和PP/MBP斜率与并发症的发生显著相关。在多变量分析中,当模型中纳入年龄和24小时PP时,只有QKD100 - 60仍与CV事件显著相关。

结论

我们的数据支持AASI作为AS的间接评估指标以及高血压患者CV风险评估要素之一的价值。然而,该指数的可重复性较低,其对并发症的预测价值不如QKD100 - 60,我们认为QKD100 - 60与AS的联系更为紧密。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验