• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助与3D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌患者的随机对照研究。

A Randomized Controlled Study of Robot-Assisted versus 3D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Carcinoma Prostate.

作者信息

Kapoor Ketan Kumar, Kumar Anup

机构信息

Department of Urology and Renal Transplant, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Adv Urol. 2023 May 23;2023:4666116. doi: 10.1155/2023/4666116. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1155/2023/4666116
PMID:37260587
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10229245/
Abstract

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective randomized comparative study was performed from 1st January 2020 to 30th June 2021. All patients included were diagnosed with localized/locally advanced ca prostate. 60 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were randomized into 2 groups. Groups A and B included patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and 3D laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy, respectively. Various demographic, intraoperative, postoperative, and follow-up parameters were collected. Outcomes were evaluated in the form of the trifecta (continence, potency, and BCR-free status) and pentafecta rates (trifecta with no perioperative complications and negative surgical margins) in between the two groups.

RESULTS

The mean operative time in Group A was 137.83 mins ± 17.27 compared to 148.20 mins ± 26.16 in Group B. Trifecta rates in Group A and Group B were 43.3%, 63.3%, and 76.6% and 40%, 53.3%, and 70% at 1, 3, and 6 months. Pentafecta rates in Group A and Group B were 36.6%, 53.3%, and 70% and 33.3%, 40%, and 53.3% at 1, 3, and 6 months. Complication rates were 10% in Group A and 13.3% in Group B, respectively. Only one patient in our study (Group B) had a positive surgical margin.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude from our comparative study, that both robot-assisted and 3D laparoscopic transperitoneal radical prostatectomy are feasible and efficacious treatment modalities for achieving acceptable trifecta and pentafecta rates in managing ca prostate with earlier continence and shorter urethrovesical anastomosis time in the robotic arm.

摘要

材料与方法

2020年1月1日至2021年6月30日进行了一项前瞻性随机对照研究。纳入的所有患者均被诊断为局限性/局部晚期前列腺癌。60例符合纳入和排除标准的患者被随机分为两组。A组和B组分别包括接受机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术和3D腹腔镜经腹根治性前列腺切除术的患者。收集了各种人口统计学、术中、术后及随访参数。以两组间的三联指标(控尿、性功能和无生化复发状态)和五联指标率(无围手术期并发症且手术切缘阴性的三联指标)形式评估结果。

结果

A组平均手术时间为137.83分钟±17.27,而B组为148.20分钟±26.16。A组和B组在1、3和6个月时的三联指标率分别为43.3%、63.3%和76.6%以及40%、53.3%和70%。A组和B组在1、3和6个月时的五联指标率分别为36.6%、53.3%和70%以及33.3%、40%和53.3%。并发症发生率A组为10%,B组为13.3%。本研究中只有一名患者(B组)手术切缘阳性。

结论

我们从比较研究中得出结论,机器人辅助和3D腹腔镜经腹根治性前列腺切除术都是可行且有效的治疗方式,在治疗前列腺癌时能达到可接受的三联指标和五联指标率,且机器人手术组控尿恢复更早,尿道膀胱吻合时间更短。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/df5d46331d0d/AU2023-4666116.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/4a1987dfb8f9/AU2023-4666116.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/c43476819406/AU2023-4666116.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/3d405a5c65be/AU2023-4666116.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/df5d46331d0d/AU2023-4666116.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/4a1987dfb8f9/AU2023-4666116.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/c43476819406/AU2023-4666116.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/3d405a5c65be/AU2023-4666116.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6b7d/10229245/df5d46331d0d/AU2023-4666116.004.jpg

相似文献

1
A Randomized Controlled Study of Robot-Assisted versus 3D Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Carcinoma Prostate.机器人辅助与3D腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术治疗前列腺癌患者的随机对照研究。
Adv Urol. 2023 May 23;2023:4666116. doi: 10.1155/2023/4666116. eCollection 2023.
2
Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.五边形:用于报告机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结果的新概念。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
3
3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study.3D与2D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:手术数据和五项指标达成率的比较:一项单队列研究
BMC Urol. 2015 Feb 21;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0006-9.
4
Transperitoneal versus extraperitoneal robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: A prospective single surgeon randomized comparative study.经腹腔与腹膜外机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术:一项前瞻性单术者随机对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2015 Oct;22(10):916-21. doi: 10.1111/iju.12854. Epub 2015 Jul 26.
5
Longitudinal analysis of trifecta outcome in Japanese patients with prostate cancer following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.日本机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺癌根治术后前列腺癌患者三结局的纵向分析。
World J Urol. 2022 Aug;40(8):2009-2015. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03515-2. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
6
Pentafecta outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: first 100 cases in Latinoamerican Hospital.机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术后的五项完美指标结果:拉丁美洲医院的前100例病例
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 Jan-Feb;39(1):20-5. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2013.12.014. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
7
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助前列腺根治术中的高级膀胱尿道支撑重建(ARVUS):一项两臂随机对照试验的一年功能结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.
8
Trends in risk-group distribution and Pentafecta outcomes in patients treated with nerve-sparing, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a 10-year low-intermediate volume single-center experience.接受保留神经、机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术治疗的患者的风险组分布和 Pentafecta 结局趋势:10 年低中度容量单中心经验。
World J Urol. 2021 Feb;39(2):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00345-020-03206-y. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
9
Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.保留雷氏间隙根治性前列腺切除术与机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:哪种技术对前列腺癌患者更有益(MASTER研究)?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol Focus. 2022 Jul;8(4):1060-1071. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.003. Epub 2021 Aug 21.
10
Pentafecta Outcomes of 230 Cases of Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy with Bilateral Neurovascular Bundle Preservation.230例保留双侧神经血管束的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的五项完美结局
Anticancer Res. 2015 Sep;35(9):5007-13.

引用本文的文献

1
A comprehensive examination and meta-analysis evaluating perioperative, oncological, and functional results of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in comparison to three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (3D LRP).一项全面的检查和荟萃分析,评估了机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)与三维腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术(3D LRP)相比的围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Sep 30;18(1):356. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02110-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Results and Complications for Open, Laparoscopic, and Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Reverse Systematic Review.开放性、腹腔镜及机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的手术结果与并发症:一项反向系统评价
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022 Sep 8;44:150-161. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.08.015. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Pentafecta rates of three-dimensional laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our experience after 150 cases.
Urologia. 2017 Apr 28;84(2):93-97. doi: 10.5301/uj.5000239. Epub 2017 Apr 22.
3
Factors predicting prolonged operative time for individual surgical steps of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP): A single surgeon's experience.预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术(RARP)各个手术步骤手术时间延长的因素:一位外科医生的经验。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2015 Jul-Aug;9(7-8):E417-22. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.2805.
4
3D vs 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in organ-confined prostate cancer: comparison of operative data and pentafecta rates: a single cohort study.3D与2D腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术治疗局限性前列腺癌:手术数据和五项指标达成率的比较:一项单队列研究
BMC Urol. 2015 Feb 21;15(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12894-015-0006-9.
5
Randomised controlled trial comparing laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.随机对照试验比较腹腔镜和机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术。
Eur Urol. 2013 Apr;63(4):606-14. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.007. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
6
Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术围手术期结局和并发症的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):431-52. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.044. Epub 2012 Jun 2.
7
Pentafecta: a new concept for reporting outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.五边形:用于报告机器人辅助腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术结果的新概念。
Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):702-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.01.032. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
8
Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy: The European and US Experience.开放性前列腺切除术与腹腔镜前列腺切除术及机器人辅助腹腔镜前列腺切除术:欧美经验
Rev Urol. 2010 Winter;12(1):35-43.
9
Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与单纯腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术的手术及功能结果直接比较:单术者经验
Urology. 2009 Jan;73(1):119-23. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.08.491. Epub 2008 Oct 26.
10
A nomogram predicting 10-year life expectancy in candidates for radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer.一种预测前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术或放疗候选者10年预期寿命的列线图。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Aug 20;25(24):3576-81. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.3820.