Suppr超能文献

qSOFA对到急诊科就诊的确诊COVID-19患者的预测性能。

Predictive performance of qSOFA in confirmed COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.

作者信息

Heydari Farhad, Abbasi Saeed, Shirani Kiana, Zamani Majid, Masoumi Babak, Majidinejad Saeed, Nasr-Esfahani Mohammad, Sadeghi-Aliabadi Mahsa, Arbab Mohammadreza

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Anesthesiology and Critical Care Research Center, Nosocomial Infection Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

出版信息

Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Jan 3;35(2):182-187. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_132_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

It is critical to quickly and easily identify coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients who become severely or even critically ill. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the accuracy of the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) score in predicting the severity and mortality of COVID-19 patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study of COVID-19 patients admitted to the emergency department (ED) between June 22, 2021, and November 21, 2021. The clinical characteristics of the participants were collected by the emergency physicians. The correlation of the qSOFA, Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome criteria (SIRS), Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), and confusion, urea, respiratory rate, blood pressure, 65 years of age and older (CURB-65) scores for 14-day mortality were evaluated. The area under a receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve analysis was calculated to compare the effectiveness of qSOFA, SIRS, PSI, and CURB-65 to predict severe disease.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and ninety-four subjects were included. Of them, 721 patients (80.6%) survived after 14 days of admission. The mean age was 58.92 ± 17.80 years, and 551 subjects (61.6%) were male. Nonsurvived patients were significantly older (51.09 ± 23.60 vs. 38.10 ± 18.24, = 0.004) and had more comorbidities (diabetes mellitus, respiratory, cardiovascular, and cerebrovascular disease) in comparison with survived patients. For COVID-19 mortality prediction, the AUROCs of qSOFA, CURB-65, PSI, and SIRS score were 0.799 (95% confidence interval [CI 0.771-0.825]), 0.829 (95% CI [0.803-0.853]), 0.830 (95% CI [0.804-0.854]), and 0.759 (95% CI [0.730-0.787]), respectively. All scores were good predictors of COVID-19 mortality.

CONCLUSION

The qSOFA was more successful than SIRS in predicting mortality for COVID-19 patients and was similar to CURB-65 and PSI. Therefore, the qSOFA score can be considered a simple and rapid screening tool for identifying high-risk patients.

摘要

目的

快速且轻松地识别出病情严重甚至危重症的2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者至关重要。因此,本研究旨在确定快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)评分在预测COVID-19患者病情严重程度和死亡率方面的准确性。

材料与方法

这是一项对2021年6月22日至2021年11月21日期间入住急诊科(ED)的COVID-19患者进行的前瞻性观察性研究。参与者的临床特征由急诊科医生收集。评估qSOFA、全身炎症反应综合征标准(SIRS)、肺炎严重程度指数(PSI)以及意识障碍、尿素、呼吸频率、血压、65岁及以上(CURB-65)评分与14天死亡率的相关性。计算受试者工作特征(AUROC)曲线下面积分析,以比较qSOFA、SIRS、PSI和CURB-65预测重症疾病的有效性。

结果

纳入894名受试者。其中,721名患者(80.6%)在入院14天后存活。平均年龄为58.92±17.80岁,551名受试者(61.6%)为男性。与存活患者相比,未存活患者年龄显著更大(51.09±23.60对38.10±18.24,P = 0.004)且合并症更多(糖尿病、呼吸系统疾病、心血管疾病和脑血管疾病)。对于COVID-19死亡率预测,qSOFA、CURB-65、PSI和SIRS评分的AUROC分别为0.799(95%置信区间[CI 0.771 - 0.825])、0.829(95% CI [0.803 - 0.853])、0.830(95% CI [0.804 - 0.854])和0.759(95% CI [0.730 - 0.787])。所有评分都是COVID-19死亡率的良好预测指标。

结论

在预测COVID-19患者死亡率方面,qSOFA比SIRS更成功,且与CURB-65和PSI相似。因此,qSOFA评分可被视为识别高危患者的一种简单快速的筛查工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/86ac/10227679/6aff62030ebd/TCMJ-35-182-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验