• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Identifying critically ill patients at risk of death from coronavirus disease.识别有死于冠状病毒病风险的重症患者。
World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(1):18-23. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.01.003.
2
Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit.SOFA 评分、SIRS 标准和 qSOFA 评分对 ICU 收治的疑似感染成人院内死亡率的预后准确性。
JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290-300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.20328.
3
Investigating SOFA, delta-SOFA and MPM-III for mortality prediction among critically ill patients at a private tertiary hospital ICU in Kenya: A retrospective cohort study.在肯尼亚一家私立三级医院 ICU 中,对危重症患者进行 SOFA、delta-SOFA 和 MPM-III 评分以预测死亡率:一项回顾性队列研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jul 16;15(7):e0235809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235809. eCollection 2020.
4
[Combined predictive value of the risk factors influencing the short-term prognosis of sepsis].[影响脓毒症短期预后的危险因素的联合预测价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2020 Mar;32(3):307-312. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20200306-00218.
5
Combining quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment with plasma lactate concentration is comparable to standard Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score in predicting mortality of patients with and without suspected infection.将快速序贯器官衰竭评估与血浆乳酸浓度相结合,在预测有或无疑似感染患者的死亡率方面,与标准序贯器官衰竭评估评分相当。
J Crit Care. 2017 Apr;38:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.10.005. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
6
[Evaluation value of the quick sequential organ failure assessment score on prognosis of intensive care unit adult patients with infection: a 17-year observation study from the real world].快速序贯器官衰竭评估评分对重症监护病房成年感染患者预后的评估价值:一项基于现实世界的17年观察性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2018 Jun;30(6):544-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2018.06.008.
7
[A multicenter confirmatory study about precision and practicability of Sepsis-3].关于脓毒症-3(Sepsis-3)精准度与实用性的多中心验证性研究
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;29(2):99-105. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2017.02.002.
8
Comparison of the performance of SOFA, qSOFA and SIRS for predicting mortality and organ failure among sepsis patients admitted to the intensive care unit in a middle-income country.在一个中等收入国家,对入住重症监护病房的脓毒症患者,比较序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)、快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)和全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)在预测死亡率和器官衰竭方面的表现。
J Crit Care. 2018 Apr;44:156-160. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2017.10.023. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
9
[The prognostic value of serum procalcitonin on severity of illness in non-sepsis critically ill patients].[血清降钙素原对非脓毒症危重症患者病情严重程度的预后价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Aug;28(8):688-93. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.08.004.
10
Combining sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score with acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score to predict hospital mortality of critically ill patients.将序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分与急性生理与慢性健康状况评估(APACHE)II评分相结合,以预测危重症患者的医院死亡率。
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Aug;35(4):515-21. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500409.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictive performance of qSOFA in confirmed COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.qSOFA对到急诊科就诊的确诊COVID-19患者的预测性能。
Tzu Chi Med J. 2023 Jan 3;35(2):182-187. doi: 10.4103/tcmj.tcmj_132_22. eCollection 2023 Apr-Jun.
2
Emergency department presentation changes due to the coronavirus disease pandemic in Nova Scotia, Canada.加拿大新斯科舍省因冠状病毒病大流行导致急诊科就诊情况的变化。
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(1):62-64. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.010.
3
COVID-19 and thyroid function: What do we know so far?COVID-19 与甲状腺功能:目前我们了解多少?
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 19;13:1041676. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1041676. eCollection 2022.
4
Physiologic Scoring Systems in Predicting the COVID-19 Patients' one-month Mortality; a Prognostic Accuracy Study.生理评分系统对COVID-19患者1个月死亡率的预测:一项预后准确性研究。
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2022 Oct 19;10(1):e83. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v10i1.1728. eCollection 2022.
5
Thyroid autoimmunity and SARS-CoV-2 infection: Report of a large Italian series.甲状腺自身免疫与 SARS-CoV-2 感染:一项大型意大利系列研究报告。
Autoimmun Rev. 2022 Nov;21(11):103183. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103183. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
6
Prediction of mortality in COVID-19 through combing CT severity score with NEWS, qSOFA, or peripheral perfusion index.通过将 CT 严重程度评分与 NEWS、qSOFA 或外周灌注指数相结合预测 COVID-19 患者的死亡率。
Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Dec;50:546-552. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.079. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
7
High triglyceride to HDL-cholesterol ratio as a biochemical marker of severe outcomes in COVID-19 patients.高甘油三酯与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇比值作为 COVID-19 患者严重结局的生化标志物。
Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Aug;44:437-444. doi: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2021.04.020. Epub 2021 May 7.
8
Treatment of COVID-19 by stage: any space left for mesenchymal stem cell therapy?新冠病毒病分阶段治疗:间充质干细胞疗法还有空间吗?
Regen Med. 2021 May;16(5):477-494. doi: 10.2217/rme-2020-0189. Epub 2021 May 14.
9
Insights into the actions of angiotensin-1 receptor (AT1R) inverse agonists: Perspectives and implications in COVID-19 treatment.血管紧张素-1受体(AT1R)反向激动剂作用的见解:对COVID-19治疗的观点及影响
EXCLI J. 2021 Feb 8;20:252-275. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-3412. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and prosthetic heart valve: An additional coagulative challenge.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)与人工心脏瓣膜:又一个凝血方面的挑战。
World J Emerg Med. 2020;11(4):258-259. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2020.04.009.
2
COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression.2019冠状病毒病:考虑细胞因子风暴综合征和免疫抑制。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1033-1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
3
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study.中国武汉成人 COVID-19 住院患者的临床病程和死亡危险因素:一项回顾性队列研究。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1054-1062. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
4
Elevation of serum ferritin levels for predicting a poor outcome in hospitalized patients with influenza infection.血清铁蛋白水平升高可预测流感感染住院患者的不良预后。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Nov;26(11):1557.e9-1557.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.02.018. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
5
Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study.中国武汉严重 COVID-19 患者的临床病程和结局:一项单中心、回顾性、观察性研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 May;8(5):475-481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
6
Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China.《武汉 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎 138 例住院患者临床特征分析》
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1061-1069. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1585.
7
Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Novel Coronavirus Infections Involving 13 Patients Outside Wuhan, China.中国武汉以外地区 13 例新型冠状病毒感染的流行病学和临床特征。
JAMA. 2020 Mar 17;323(11):1092-1093. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.1623.
8
First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States.美国首例 2019 新型冠状病毒病例。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Mar 5;382(10):929-936. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001191. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
9
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
10
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.2019 年中国肺炎患者中的一种新型冠状病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

识别有死于冠状病毒病风险的重症患者。

Identifying critically ill patients at risk of death from coronavirus disease.

作者信息

Guo Wei, Ran Lin-Yu, Zhu Ji-Hong, Ge Qing-Gang, Du Zhe, Wang Fei-Long, Gao Wei-Bo, Wang Tian-Bing

机构信息

Trauma Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China.

Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University, Shanghai 200120, China.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2021;12(1):18-23. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.01.003.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2021.01.003
PMID:33505545
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7790703/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A pandemic of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has been declared by the World Health Organization (WHO) and caring for critically ill patients is expected to be at the core of battling this disease. However, little is known regarding an early detection of patients at high risk of fatality.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study recruited consecutive adult patients admitted between February 8 and February 29, 2020, to the three intensive care units (ICUs) in a designated hospital for treating COVID-19 in Wuhan. The detailed clinical information and laboratory results for each patient were obtained. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Potential predictors were analyzed for possible association with outcomes, and the predictive performance of indicators was assessed from the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

A total of 121 critically ill patients were included in the study, and 28.9% (35/121) of them died in the hospital. The non-survivors were older and more likely to develop acute organ dysfunction, and had higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and quick SOFA (qSOFA) scores. Among the laboratory variables on admission, we identified 12 useful biomarkers for the prediction of in-hospital mortality, as suggested by area under the curve (AUC) above 0.80. The AUCs for three markers neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), thyroid hormones free triiodothyronine (FT3), and ferritin were 0.857, 0.863, and 0.827, respectively. The combination of two easily accessed variables NLR and ferritin had comparable AUC with SOFA score for the prediction of in-hospital mortality (0.901 vs. 0.955, =0.085).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute organ dysfunction combined with older age is associated with fatal outcomes in COVID-19 patients. Circulating biomarkers could be used as powerful predictors for the in-hospital mortality.

摘要

背景

世界卫生组织(WHO)已宣布冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,救治重症患者预计是抗击该疾病的核心。然而,对于早期发现高死亡风险患者却知之甚少。

方法

这项回顾性队列研究纳入了2020年2月8日至2月29日期间连续收治到武汉一家指定的COVID-19治疗医院的三个重症监护病房(ICU)的成年患者。获取了每位患者的详细临床信息和实验室检查结果。主要结局是院内死亡率。分析潜在预测因素与结局之间可能的关联,并从受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估指标的预测性能。

结果

该研究共纳入121例重症患者,其中28.9%(35/121)在医院死亡。未存活者年龄更大,更易发生急性器官功能障碍,序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)和快速SOFA(qSOFA)评分更高。在入院时的实验室变量中,我们确定了12种有助于预测院内死亡率的生物标志物,曲线下面积(AUC)大于0.80表明其具有预测价值。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、甲状腺激素游离三碘甲状腺原氨酸(FT3)和铁蛋白这三种标志物的AUC分别为0.857、0.863和0.827。NLR和铁蛋白这两个易于获取的变量相结合,在预测院内死亡率方面与SOFA评分具有相当的AUC(0.901对0.955,P = 0.085)。

结论

急性器官功能障碍合并高龄与COVID-19患者的致命结局相关。循环生物标志物可作为院内死亡率的有力预测指标。