Rnic Katerina, Santee Angela C, Hoffmeister Jennifer-Ashley, Liu Hallie, Chang Katharine K, Chen Rachel X, Neufeld Richard W J, Machado Daniel A, Starr Lisa R, Dozois David J A, LeMoult Joelle
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia.
Department of Psychology, University of Rochester.
Psychol Bull. 2023 May-Jun;149(5-6):330-369. doi: 10.1037/bul0000390. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
Stress generation theory initially posited that depression elevates risk for some stressful events (i.e., dependent events) but not others (i.e., independent events). This preregistered meta-analytic review examined whether stress generation occurs transdiagnostically by examining 95 longitudinal studies with 38,228 participants (537 total effect sizes) from over 30 years of research. Our multilevel meta-analyses found evidence of stress generation across a broad range of psychopathology, as evidenced by significantly larger prospective effects for dependent (overall psychopathology: = .23) than independent (overall psychopathology: = .10) stress. We also identified unique patterns of effects across specific types of psychopathology. For example, effects were larger for depression than anxiety. Furthermore, effects were sometimes larger in studies with younger participants, shorter time lags between assessments, checklist measures of stress, and for interpersonal stressors. Finally, a multilevel meta-analytic structural equation model suggested that dependent stress exacerbates psychopathology symptoms over time (β = .04), possibly contributing to chronicity. Interventions targeting the prevention of stress generation may mitigate chronic psychopathology. Conclusions of this study are limited by the predominance of depression effect sizes in the literature and our review of only English language articles. On the other hand, the findings are strengthened by rigorous inclusion criteria, lack of publication bias, and absence of moderating effects by publication year. The latter underscores the replicability of the stress generation effect over the last 30 years. Taken together, the review provides robust evidence that stress generation is a cross-diagnostic phenomenon that contributes to a vicious cycle of increasing stress and psychopathology. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
压力产生理论最初假定,抑郁会增加某些应激事件(即依赖事件)的风险,但不会增加其他事件(即独立事件)的风险。这项预先注册的荟萃分析通过审视30多年来的95项纵向研究(涉及38228名参与者,共537个总体效应量),来检验压力产生是否具有跨诊断性。我们的多层次荟萃分析发现了广泛心理病理学领域中压力产生的证据,依赖应激(总体心理病理学:=0.23)比独立应激(总体心理病理学:=0.10)具有显著更大的前瞻性效应,这一点就证明了这一点。我们还确定了特定类型心理病理学中独特的效应模式。例如,抑郁的效应比焦虑更大。此外,在针对年轻参与者的研究、评估之间时间间隔较短的研究、压力的清单测量研究以及人际应激源的研究中,效应有时更大。最后,一个多层次荟萃分析结构方程模型表明,随着时间的推移,依赖应激会加剧心理病理学症状(β = 0.04),这可能导致慢性化。针对预防压力产生的干预措施可能会减轻慢性心理病理学症状。本研究的结论受到文献中抑郁效应量占主导以及我们仅回顾英文文章的限制。另一方面,严格的纳入标准、不存在发表偏倚以及出版年份没有调节效应,这些都加强了研究结果。后者强调了过去30年中压力产生效应的可重复性。综上所述,该综述提供了有力证据,表明压力产生是一种跨诊断现象,它促成了压力和心理病理学不断增加的恶性循环。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)