Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Department of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):507-513. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07087-5. Epub 2023 Jun 1.
To assess the impact of preoperative endocervicoscopy on obstetric outcomes and complications in women undergoing LEEP for CIN2 + .
This was a retrospective cohort study carried out between October 2012 and April 2018. All women had undergone cervical length measurement at T0 (before LEEP), T1 (6 months after LEEP), and T2 (at 20 weeks of pregnancy) through transvaginal ultrasound examination after LEEP for CIN2 + . A total of 528 patients fulfilled our inclusion criteria and contributed to the final analysis: 288 had undergone endocervicoscopy before the excisional procedure (Group A), while the remaining 240 (Group B) did not.
Patients who did not undergo endocervicoscopy showed a greater amount of tissue excised at LEEP compared to those of Group A (6.7% vs 31.9% in Group A and B, p < 0.01, respectively). A statistically relevant difference was detected in the lesion margins involvement: negative in 93.8% in Group A compared to 65.6% in Group B. The cervicometry before the treatment resulted in similar between the two groups, while a statistically significant difference was noted after 6 months (37.5 ± 2.9 mm in Group A vs 35.1 ± 3.8 mm in Group B, p < 0.01) and at 20th week pregnancy (36.9 ± 5.3 mm in Group A vs 33.5 ± 5.6 mm in Group B, p < 0.01). The number of pregnancies after LEEP as well as the difference in the elapsed time (in months) did not result in a statistical significance between the two groups. The threatened preterm labor (TPL) and the threatened miscarriage showed a statistically significant difference in incidence between the two groups (4,2% and 4.2% in Group A vs 15.3% and 25% in Group B, p < 0.01, respectively).
Endocervicoscopy reduces the size of the LEEP sample and in particular its depth, saving healthy cervical tissue, and guarantees the total eradication of the lesion as the resection margins are negative in almost all cases, allowing for a reduction of the rate of TPL and threatened miscarriage in women with CIN2 + , especially with Type 2 or 3 cervical squamocolumnar junction (SCJ).
评估术前阴道镜检查对行 LEEP 治疗 CIN2+的女性的产科结局和并发症的影响。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,于 2012 年 10 月至 2018 年 4 月进行。所有女性在 LEEP 治疗 CIN2+后均通过经阴道超声检查在 T0(LEEP 前)、T1(LEEP 后 6 个月)和 T2(妊娠 20 周)时测量宫颈长度。共有 528 名患者符合纳入标准并参与了最终分析:288 名患者在切除术前接受了阴道镜检查(A 组),其余 240 名患者(B 组)未接受阴道镜检查。
与 A 组相比,未行阴道镜检查的患者在 LEEP 中切除的组织量更多(A 组为 6.7%,B 组为 31.9%,p<0.01)。在病变边缘受累方面存在统计学显著差异:A 组 93.8%为阴性,B 组为 65.6%。两组治疗前的宫颈测量结果相似,但治疗后 6 个月(A 组 37.5±2.9mm,B 组 35.1±3.8mm,p<0.01)和妊娠 20 周时(A 组 36.9±5.3mm,B 组 33.5±5.6mm,p<0.01)差异有统计学意义。LEEP 后妊娠的数量以及时间(月)的差异在两组之间无统计学意义。早产(TPL)和流产先兆在两组中的发生率存在统计学显著差异(A 组分别为 4.2%和 4.2%,B 组分别为 15.3%和 25%,p<0.01)。
阴道镜检查可减少 LEEP 样本的大小,特别是其深度,从而保存健康的宫颈组织,并保证病变的完全切除,因为几乎所有情况下切除边缘均为阴性,从而降低 CIN2+患者的 TPL 和流产先兆的发生率,尤其是宫颈鳞状柱状交界(SCJ)为 2 型或 3 型的患者。