• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个学术医院系统中,实验室自行开发的检测项目仅占所订购检测项目的一小部分。

Laboratory-Developed Tests Account for a Small Minority of Tests Ordered in an Academic Hospital System.

作者信息

Rychert Jenna, Schmidt Robert L, Genzen Jonathan R

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 Sep 1;160(3):297-302. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad051.

DOI:10.1093/ajcp/aqad051
PMID:37265129
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine the frequency of use of laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) in an academic medical center system.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 2021 test order data from an academic medical center (hospital, outpatient clinics, and cancer center) was done. Measures included assay type, assay methodology, regulatory status, test order volume, inpatient vs outpatient setting, and provider medical specialty.

RESULTS

Of the 3,016,928 tests ordered in 2021, 2,831,489 (93.9%) were tests cleared, approved, and/or authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); 116,583 (3.9%) were LDTs; and 68,856 (2.3%) were standard methods. These test orders were performed using a total of 1,954 distinct assays. Of these, 983 (50.3%) were FDA assays, 880 (45.0%) were LDTs, and 91 (4.7%) were standard methods. Laboratory-developed tests were more commonly ordered in the outpatient vs inpatient setting and represented a higher proportion of the test volume at the cancer center compared with the university hospital (5.6% vs 3.6%, respectively). The top 167 LDT assays accounted for 90% of the LDT volume (104,996 orders). Among the 20 most frequently ordered LDTs were mass spectrometry assays and tests used in the care of immunocompromised patients. Internal/family medicine placed the greatest number of orders (1,044,642) and ordered one of the lowest proportions of LDTs (3.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Laboratory-developed tests made up a small percentage of the total laboratory tests ordered within the academic health system studied.

摘要

目的

确定学术医疗中心系统中实验室自建检测方法(LDTs)的使用频率。

方法

对一家学术医疗中心(医院、门诊诊所和癌症中心)2021年的检测订单数据进行回顾性分析。分析指标包括检测类型、检测方法、监管状态、检测订单量、住院与门诊环境以及医疗服务提供者的医学专业。

结果

在2021年订购的3,016,928项检测中,2,831,489项(93.9%)是经美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)批准、认可和/或授权的检测;116,583项(3.9%)是实验室自建检测方法;68,856项(2.3%)是标准方法。这些检测订单总共使用了1,954种不同的检测方法。其中,983种(50.3%)是FDA检测方法,880种(45.0%)是实验室自建检测方法,91种(4.7%)是标准方法。与大学医院相比,实验室自建检测方法在门诊环境中比住院环境中更常被订购,且在癌症中心的检测量中占比更高(分别为5.6%和3.6%)。前167种实验室自建检测方法占实验室自建检测量的90%(104,996份订单)。在最常订购的20种实验室自建检测方法中,包括质谱分析检测方法和用于免疫功能低下患者护理的检测方法。内科/家庭医学科的订单数量最多(1,044,642份),但订购的实验室自建检测方法比例最低(3.2%)。

结论

在所研究的学术医疗系统中,实验室自建检测方法在总实验室检测订单中占比很小。

相似文献

1
Laboratory-Developed Tests Account for a Small Minority of Tests Ordered in an Academic Hospital System.在一个学术医院系统中,实验室自行开发的检测项目仅占所订购检测项目的一小部分。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2023 Sep 1;160(3):297-302. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqad051.
2
Comparison of Laboratory-Developed Tests and FDA-Approved Assays for BRAF, EGFR, and KRAS Testing.实验室自建检测与 FDA 批准的 BRAF、EGFR 和 KRAS 检测试剂的比较。
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Jun 1;4(6):838-841. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4021.
3
Perspective for the development of companion diagnostics and regulatory landscape to encourage personalized medicine in Japan.日本伴随诊断的发展前景及鼓励个性化医疗的监管环境。
Breast Cancer. 2016 Jan;23(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s12282-015-0586-y. Epub 2015 Jan 22.
4
Impact of the loss of Laboratory Developed Mass Spectrometry testing at a major academic medical center.一家主要学术医疗中心实验室自主研发质谱检测缺失的影响。
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2023 Apr;28:63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.02.005. Epub 2023 Feb 18.
5
Temporary Regulatory Deviations and the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) PCR Labeling Update Study Indicate What Laboratory-Developed Test Regulation by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Could Look Like.临时监管调整和 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)PCR 标签更新研究表明,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)对实验室开发的检测的监管可能是什么样子。
J Mol Diagn. 2021 Oct;23(10):1207-1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2021.07.011. Epub 2021 Sep 16.
6
Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests in Preventive Oncology: Emerging Needs and Opportunities.在预防肿瘤学中对实验室研发检测的监管:新兴需求与机遇。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jan 1;41(1):11-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00995. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Laboratory-Developed Tests: A Legislative and Regulatory Review.实验室自建检测方法:立法与监管审查
Clin Chem. 2017 Oct;63(10):1575-1584. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275164. Epub 2017 Jul 7.
8
Quantitative tandem mass spectrometry in the clinical laboratory: Regulation and opportunity for validation of laboratory developed tests.临床实验室中的定量串联质谱分析:实验室自建检测方法验证的规范与机遇
J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab. 2023 Mar 5;28:82-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsacl.2023.03.001. eCollection 2023 Apr.
9
Laboratory-Developed Tests: Design of a Regulatory Strategy in Compliance with the International State-of-the-Art and the Regulation (EU) 2017/746 (EU IVDR [In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Device Regulation]).实验室自建检测方法:符合国际最新技术水平及欧盟法规(EU)2017/746(欧盟体外诊断医疗器械法规)的监管策略设计
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Jan;56(1):47-64. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00323-7. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
10
Point-Counterpoint: The FDA Has a Role in Regulation of Laboratory-Developed Tests.针锋相对:美国食品药品监督管理局在实验室自建检测的监管中发挥作用。
J Clin Microbiol. 2016 Apr;54(4):829-33. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00063-16. Epub 2016 Jan 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The US FDA's proposed rule on laboratory-developed tests: Impacts on clinical laboratory testing.美国食品药品监督管理局关于实验室自建检测的拟议规则:对临床实验室检测的影响
Pract Lab Med. 2024 May 23;40:e00407. doi: 10.1016/j.plabm.2024.e00407. eCollection 2024 May.