Department of Pathobiology and Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road East, Guelph, Ontario NIG 2W1 (Weese); Diagnostic Services (Saab) and Department of Health Management (Saab, McClure), Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, 550 University Avenue, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island C1A 4P3; Animal Health and Welfare Branch, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 5th Floor NW, 1 Stone Road West, Guelph, Ontario N1G 4Y2 (Moore); Animal Health Laboratory, University of Guelph, 419 Gordon Street, Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 (Cai).
Can Vet J. 2023 Jun;64(6):549-552.
To compare PCR and culture results for the detection of subspecies .
Respiratory tract samples (N = 158) from horses being tested for
Bacterial culture was carried out on samples from which was detected by quantitative real-time PCR.
was isolated from 12 (7.6%) samples: 4/9 (44%) samples when the PCR cycle threshold (C) was ≤ 30, 7/30 (23%) when the C was 30.1 to 35, and 1/119 (0.8%) when the C was 35.1 to 40. The highest C sample from a sample that yielded a positive culture was 36.9. The optimal Youden's J value was at a C of 34.2, the same value as determined by number needed to misdiagnose when the cost of a false negative is deemed to be either 5 or 10 × that of a false positive.
Viable was only detected in a minority of quantitative PCR (qPCR) positive samples. A qPCR C of 34.2 was a reasonable breakpoint for likelihood of the presence of culturable
Evaluation of C values may be useful as a proxy to indicate the likelihood of cultivable being present and could be useful as part of risk assessments.
比较聚合酶链反应(PCR)和培养结果在检测亚种方面的表现。
接受检测的马的呼吸道样本(N=158)。
对定量实时 PCR 检测到的样本进行细菌培养。
从 12 份(7.6%)样本中分离出了,其中 4/9(44%)样本的 PCR 循环阈值(C)≤30,7/30(23%)的 C 值为 30.1 至 35,1/119(0.8%)的 C 值为 35.1 至 40。从培养阳性的样本中,C 值最高的样本为 36.9。最佳 Youden's J 值为 C 值 34.2,这与当假阴性的成本被认为是假阳性的 5 倍或 10 倍时,需要误诊的数量所确定的数值相同。
只有少数定量 PCR(qPCR)阳性样本中检测到有活力的。qPCR 的 C 值为 34.2 是一个有意义的临界点,可以用来判断是否存在可培养的。
评估 C 值可以作为指示是否存在可培养的的可能性的替代指标,并且可能作为风险评估的一部分有用。