• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于脑电图的单变量和多变量分析表明,多种过程有助于识别中的产生效应。

EEG-based univariate and multivariate analyses reveal that multiple processes contribute to the production effect in recognition.

机构信息

College of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia; Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.

出版信息

Cortex. 2023 Aug;165:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.006
PMID:37267658
Abstract

The production effect (PE) is the finding that reading words aloud rather than silently during study leads to improved memory. We used electroencephalography (EEG) techniques to detect the contributions of recollection, familiarity, and attentional processes to the PE in recognition memory, using Chinese stimuli. During the study phase, participants encoded each list item aloud, silently, or by performing a non-unique aloud (control) task. During the test phase, they made remember/know/new recognition judgments. We recorded EEG data in both phases. The behavioral results replicated the typical pattern with English stimuli: Recognition was better in the aloud condition than in the silent (and control) condition, and this PE was due to enhanced recollection and familiarity. At study, the amplitude of the P3b ERP component was greater in the aloud than in the silent/control conditions, suggesting that reading aloud increases attention or preparatory processing during the intention phase. At test, the recollection-based LPC old/new effect was largest in the aloud condition; however, the familiarity-based FN400 old/new effect was equivalent between the aloud condition and the silent/control conditions. Only the LPC effect correlated with the behavioral effect. Moreover, multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) showed that accurate classification of items as 'aloud' versus 'new' mainly occurred in the later period of the recognition response, consistent with the LPC old/new effect. Our findings suggest that the within-subject PE in recognition memory reflects enhanced attention and distinctiveness, rather than increased memory strength. More broadly, our findings suggest that encoding strategies such as production enhance recollection more than familiarity.

摘要

出声阅读效应(PE)是指在学习过程中出声阅读而不是默读会导致记忆提高的发现。我们使用脑电图(EEG)技术,使用中文刺激物,来检测再认记忆中回忆、熟悉度和注意力过程对 PE 的贡献。在学习阶段,参与者大声、默读或进行非独特的出声(对照)任务来对每个列表项进行编码。在测试阶段,他们进行了记得/知道/新的识别判断。我们在两个阶段都记录了 EEG 数据。行为结果复制了使用英语刺激物的典型模式:在出声条件下的识别比在默读(和对照)条件下更好,而这种 PE 是由于回忆和熟悉度的增强。在学习时,出声条件下的 P3b ERP 成分的振幅大于默读/对照条件,表明出声阅读会在意图阶段增加注意力或预备处理。在测试时,出声条件下的基于回忆的 LPC 旧/新效应最大;然而,基于熟悉度的 FN400 旧/新效应在出声条件和默读/对照条件之间是相等的。只有 LPC 效应与行为效应相关。此外,多变量模式分析(MVPA)表明,将项目准确分类为“出声”与“新”主要发生在识别反应的后期,与 LPC 旧/新效应一致。我们的发现表明,再认记忆中的个体内 PE 反映了增强的注意力和独特性,而不是增强的记忆强度。更广泛地说,我们的发现表明,编码策略(如出声)会增强回忆而不是熟悉度。

相似文献

1
EEG-based univariate and multivariate analyses reveal that multiple processes contribute to the production effect in recognition.基于脑电图的单变量和多变量分析表明,多种过程有助于识别中的产生效应。
Cortex. 2023 Aug;165:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 5.
2
Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.熟悉感而非回忆,支持了识别记忆中的主体间产生效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):99-115. doi: 10.1037/cep0000089.
3
Neural correlates of the production effect: An fMRI study.神经关联的产生效应:一项 fMRI 研究。
Brain Cogn. 2021 Aug;152:105757. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2021.105757. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
4
Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.产生既有利于回忆也有利于熟悉度。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):326-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0165-1.
5
Neurophysiological evidence for a recollection impairment in amnesia patients that leaves familiarity intact.神经生理学证据表明,遗忘症患者的记忆再现能力受损,但熟悉感完好无损。
Neuropsychologia. 2012 Nov;50(13):3004-14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.07.038. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
6
Examining ERP correlates of recognition memory: evidence of accurate source recognition without recollection.考察 ERP 与再认记忆的关联:无记忆回溯的准确源识别证据。
Neuroimage. 2012 Aug 1;62(1):439-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.031. Epub 2012 Apr 25.
7
Production between and within: distinctiveness and the relative magnitude of the production effect.产生于个体之间和个体之内:独特性和产生效应的相对幅度。
Memory. 2021 Feb;29(2):168-179. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2020.1868526. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
8
Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance: Behavioral and event-related potential study.单元化不会阻碍整体项目识别性能:行为和事件相关电位研究。
Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2020 Jan;167:107130. doi: 10.1016/j.nlm.2019.107130. Epub 2019 Nov 28.
9
The effects of unitization on the contribution of familiarity and recollection processes to associative recognition memory: evidence from event-related potentials.单元化对熟悉度和回忆过程在关联识别记忆中贡献的影响:来自事件相关电位的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2015 Mar;95(3):355-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.01.003. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
10
Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.唱歌产生效应的潜在机制。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):254-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000179. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG-based multivariate and univariate analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying the recognition-based production effect: evidence from mixed-list design.基于脑电图的多变量和单变量分析揭示了基于识别的产生效应背后的机制:来自混合列表设计的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 29;19:1507782. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1507782. eCollection 2025.
2
Generation (not production) improves the fidelity of visual representations in picture naming.生成(而非产生)提高了图片命名中视觉表征的保真度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):482-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02566-5. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
3
Production benefits on encoding are modulated by language experience: Less experience may help.
编码方面的产出受语言经验的调节:经验越少可能越有帮助。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):926-943. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01510-7. Epub 2024 Apr 15.