• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

熟悉感而非回忆,支持了识别记忆中的主体间产生效应。

Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.

作者信息

Fawcett Jonathan M, Ozubko Jason D

机构信息

MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.

Rotman Research Institute.

出版信息

Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):99-115. doi: 10.1037/cep0000089.

DOI:10.1037/cep0000089
PMID:27244352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4886847/
Abstract

Five experiments explored the basis of the between-subjects production effect in recognition memory as represented by differences in the recollection and familiarity of produced (read aloud) and nonproduced (read silently) words. Using remember-know judgments (Experiment 1b) and a dual-process signal-detection approach applied to confidence ratings (Experiments 2b and 3), we observed that production influences familiarity but not recollection when manipulated between-subjects. This is in contrast to within-subject designs, which reveal a clear effect of production on both recollection and familiarity (Experiments 1a and 2a). Our findings resolve contention concerning apparent design effects: Whereas the within-subject production effect is subserved by separable recollective- and familiarity-based components, the between-subjects production effect is subserved by the familiarity-based component alone. Our findings support a role for the relative distinctiveness of production as a means of guiding recognition judgments (at least when manipulated within-subjects), but we also propose that production influences the strength of produced items, explaining the persistence of the effect in between-subjects designs. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

五项实验探究了识别记忆中被试间产生效应的基础,该效应表现为出声读出的(产生的)单词和默读的(未产生的)单词在回忆和熟悉度上的差异。通过使用记得-知道判断(实验1b)以及应用于信心评级的双加工信号检测方法(实验2b和3),我们观察到,当在被试间进行操纵时,产生会影响熟悉度,但不会影响回忆。这与被试内设计形成对比,在被试内设计中,产生对回忆和熟悉度都有明显影响(实验1a和2a)。我们的研究结果解决了有关明显设计效应的争论:虽然被试内产生效应由基于回忆和熟悉度的可分离成分所支持,但被试间产生效应仅由基于熟悉度的成分所支持。我们的研究结果支持产生的相对独特性在引导识别判断中所起的作用(至少在被试内进行操纵时),但我们也提出,产生会影响所产生项目的强度,这解释了该效应在被试间设计中的持续性。(《心理学文摘数据库记录》)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/82244ec13059/cep_70_2_99_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/5662f22a321e/cep_70_2_99_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/265002d41470/cep_70_2_99_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/72107f873fd6/cep_70_2_99_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/f6cf654b5f29/cep_70_2_99_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/82244ec13059/cep_70_2_99_fig5a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/5662f22a321e/cep_70_2_99_fig1a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/265002d41470/cep_70_2_99_fig2a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/72107f873fd6/cep_70_2_99_fig3a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/f6cf654b5f29/cep_70_2_99_fig4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5637/4886847/82244ec13059/cep_70_2_99_fig5a.jpg

相似文献

1
Familiarity, but not recollection, supports the between-subject production effect in recognition memory.熟悉感而非回忆,支持了识别记忆中的主体间产生效应。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):99-115. doi: 10.1037/cep0000089.
2
EEG-based univariate and multivariate analyses reveal that multiple processes contribute to the production effect in recognition.基于脑电图的单变量和多变量分析表明,多种过程有助于识别中的产生效应。
Cortex. 2023 Aug;165:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.04.006. Epub 2023 May 5.
3
A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.熟悉度在支持测试效应随时间的推移中的作用。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Feb 17;138:107298. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107298. Epub 2019 Dec 12.
4
Production benefits both recollection and familiarity.产生既有利于回忆也有利于熟悉度。
Mem Cognit. 2012 Apr;40(3):326-38. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0165-1.
5
Recollection and familiarity make independent contributions to memory judgments.记忆的再认和熟悉性独立地影响记忆判断。
J Neurosci. 2012 May 23;32(21):7253-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6396-11.2012.
6
Mechanisms underlying the production effect for singing.唱歌产生效应的潜在机制。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Dec;73(4):254-264. doi: 10.1037/cep0000179. Epub 2019 Aug 8.
7
Independent recollection-familiarity ratings: Similar effects of levels-of-processing whether amount or confidence is rated.独立的回忆-熟悉度评级:无论对数量还是信心进行评级,加工水平都有类似的效果。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2019 Jun;73(2):94-99. doi: 10.1037/cep0000161. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
8
Familiarity is related to conceptual implicit memory: an examination of individual differences.熟悉度与概念性内隐记忆有关:个体差异的考察。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Dec;19(6):1154-64. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0298-7.
9
Recollection can be weak and familiarity can be strong.记忆可能较弱,而熟悉感可能较强。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Mar;38(2):325-39. doi: 10.1037/a0025483. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
10
Impaired capacity for familiarity after hippocampal damage.海马体损伤后熟悉能力受损。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Jun 7;108(23):9655-60. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107247108. Epub 2011 May 23.

引用本文的文献

1
EEG-based multivariate and univariate analyses reveal the mechanisms underlying the recognition-based production effect: evidence from mixed-list design.基于脑电图的多变量和单变量分析揭示了基于识别的产生效应背后的机制:来自混合列表设计的证据。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Jan 29;19:1507782. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1507782. eCollection 2025.
2
It's All About That Case.这都是关于那个病例。
Exp Psychol. 2024 Mar;71(2):83-96. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000615. Epub 2024 Sep 24.
3
Generation (not production) improves the fidelity of visual representations in picture naming.

本文引用的文献

1
The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?长列表回忆中的产生效应:顺序无关紧要?
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):165-76. doi: 10.1037/cep0000086.
2
Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.订单信息用于指导长列表的回忆:项目顺序理论的进一步证据。
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):125-38. doi: 10.1037/cep0000088.
3
The production effect in recognition memory: Weakening strength can strengthen distinctiveness.识别记忆中的产生效应:强度减弱可增强独特性。
生成(而非产生)提高了图片命名中视觉表征的保真度。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2025 Feb;32(1):482-491. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02566-5. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
4
Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension.朗读文本有助于记忆,但无助于理解。
Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):57-72. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01442-2. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
5
The Production Effect Interacts With Serial Positions.产生效应与序列位置相互作用。
Exp Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):12-22. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000540. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Emotional memories are (usually) harder to forget: A meta-analysis of the item-method directed forgetting literature.情绪记忆(通常)更难忘记:项目-方法定向遗忘文献的元分析。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1313-1326. doi: 10.3758/s13423-021-01914-z. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
7
The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.有意遗忘的表征后果:对长期记忆的概率和保真度的损害。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):56-81. doi: 10.1037/xge0000128.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2016 Jun;70(2):93-8. doi: 10.1037/cep0000082.
4
The d-Prime directive: Assessing costs and benefits in recognition by dissociating mixed-list false alarm rates.d-prime指令:通过区分混合列表误报率来评估识别中的成本和收益。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Jul;42(7):1090-111. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000214. Epub 2016 Jan 28.
5
The representational consequences of intentional forgetting: Impairments to both the probability and fidelity of long-term memory.有意遗忘的表征后果:对长期记忆的概率和保真度的损害。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2016 Jan;145(1):56-81. doi: 10.1037/xge0000128.
6
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?贝叶斯统计与经典统计:你站在哪一边?
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011 May;6(3):274-90. doi: 10.1177/1745691611406920.
7
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.用于验证性假设检验的随机效应结构:保持其最大化。
J Mem Lang. 2013 Apr;68(3). doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
8
The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander.我们接触阅读材料的方式会影响我们思维漫游的频率。
Front Psychol. 2013 Nov 28;4:892. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00892. eCollection 2013.
9
Assessing the costs and benefits of production in recognition.评估认可生产的成本和收益。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2014 Feb;21(1):149-54. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0485-1.
10
The production effect: costs and benefits in free recall.生成效应:自由回忆中的成本与收益。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2014 Jan;40(1):300-5. doi: 10.1037/a0033337. Epub 2013 Jun 10.