Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, 010107, China; Department of Plastic Surgery, The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, 410013, China.
The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410007, China.
Phytomedicine. 2023 Jul 25;116:154892. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154892. Epub 2023 May 24.
The annual incidence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) has been reported to vary from 0.2% to 11% in diabetes-specific clinical settings and less than 0.1% to 8% in community- and population-based cohorts. According to the International Diabetes Foundation, approximately 40 million to 60 million people worldwide are affected by DFUs, and a recent meta-analysis indicates a global prevalence of 6.3% among adults with diabetes, or about 33 million individuals. The cost of diabetes care is significant, amounting to $273 billion in direct and $90 billion in indirect expenses annually, in America. Foot complications in diabetes care excess annual expenditures ranging from 50% to 200% above the baseline cost of diabetes-related care. The cost of advanced-stage ulcers can be more than $50,000 per wound episode, and the direct expenses of major amputation are even higher. DFUs can be treated using various methods, including wound dressings, antibiotics, pressure-off loading, skin substitutes, stem cells, debridement, topical oxygen therapy, gene therapy and growth factors. For severe DFUs patients are at risk of amputation if treatment is not timely or appropriate. Amputating limbs not only causes physical pain to patients, but also brings economic burden due to lost productivity, and decreased employment linked to DFUs. Currently, long-term use of local antibiotics in clinical practice is prone to induce drug resistance, while growth factors do not effectively inhibit bacterial growth and control inflammation in wounds. Stem cell and gene therapies are still in the experimental stage. The method of local debridement combined with negative pressure therapy is expensive. Therefore, we urgently need an affordable, non-surgical method to treat diabetic ulcers. Extracts of bark of Bauhinia purpurea, Paeoniae rubrae, Angelica dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav. (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav., Acorus calamus L, and Radix Angelicae biseratae have been used as traditional remedies to treat inflammation-related diseases and cutaneous wounds due to their anti-inflammatory properties and their ability to promote vascular renewal. However, there have been few studies on the mixture of these five herbal extracts on diabetic wound healing.
This study was designed to assess the healing effect of a mixture of five aforementioned herbal extracts on diabetic ulcer wounds in rats, and to reveal the potential mechanisms behind any potential wound healing using transcriptomics and proteomics.
We designed the experiment to explore the effects of five herbal extracts on diabetic wound healing process through in vivo experiments and to investigate the underlying mechanisms through proteomics and transcriptomics.
We used a mixture of five aforementioned herbal extract to treat rat model of diabetic established by intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin, and a 2 × 2 cm round full-thickness skin defect was created on the back of the rat. Staphylococcus aureus (1 ml of 1.5 × 10 cfu/ml) was evenly applied to the wound. The wound was then observed for 72 h. The infected ulcer model of diabetic rats was considered to be successfully established if the wound was found to be infected with S. aureus. According to different medications, the rats were divided into three groups, namely mixture of herbal extract (MHE), Kangfuxin solution (KFS) and control (Ctrl). The effects of the medicine on wound healing were observed. HE staining and Masson staining were performed to evaluate the histopathological changes and collagen synthesis. IHC staining was used to assess the neovascularization, and M2 macrophage proliferation was determined by immunofluorescence staining. Proteomic and transcriptomic studies were performed to explore potential mechanism of five herbal extracts to promote wound healing. UHPLC-QE-MS was performed to identify the chemical composition of mixture of herbal extract.
The study show that the mixed herbal extract promotes angiogenesis, proliferation of M2 macrophages, and collagen synthesis. Transcriptomics showed that rno-miR-1298, rno-miR-144-5p, and rno-miR-92a-1-5p are vital miRNAs which also play a significant role in role in regulating wound healing. Proteomics results showed that the following proteins were important in wounds treated with MHE: Rack1, LOC100362366, Cops2, Cops6, Eif4e, Eif3c, Rpl12, Srp54, Rpl13 and Lsm7. Autophagy, PI3-Akt and mTOR signaling pathways were enriched after treatment with MHE compared to other groups.
Herein, we have shown that MHE containing extracts of bark of Bauhinia purpurea, P. rubrae, A. dahurica (Hoffm.) Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav., A. calamus L, and R. A. biseratae has significant wound healing effects in the diabetic ulcer wound rat model. These results suggest that local application of MHE in diabetic wounds can accelerate the wound healing process. Moreover, in vivo experiments revealed that the diabetic wound healing process was primarily mediated by angiogenesis and M2 macrophage transition. Therefore, this study may provide a promising and non-surgical therapeutic strategy to accelerate diabetic wound healing, thereby decreasing the number of limb amputations in diabetic patients.
糖尿病足溃疡(DFU)的年发病率在糖尿病专科临床环境中报道为 0.2%至 11%,在社区和人群队列中则为小于 0.1%至 8%。根据国际糖尿病联合会的数据,全球约有 4000 万至 6000 万人受到 DFU 的影响,最近的一项荟萃分析表明,成年人糖尿病的全球患病率为 6.3%,即约 3300 万人。糖尿病护理的成本很高,在美国直接和间接费用每年分别达到 2730 亿美元和 900 亿美元。糖尿病护理中的足部并发症使每年的超额支出比糖尿病相关护理的基线成本高出 50%至 200%。晚期溃疡的成本可能超过每个伤口 50000 美元,而主要截肢的直接费用甚至更高。DFU 可以通过多种方法治疗,包括伤口敷料、抗生素、压力减轻、皮肤替代品、干细胞、清创、局部吸氧治疗、基因治疗和生长因子。对于严重的 DFU 患者,如果治疗不及时或不适当,可能会有截肢的风险。截肢不仅给患者带来身体上的痛苦,还会因生产力下降和与 DFU 相关的就业机会减少而带来经济负担。目前,临床实践中局部抗生素的长期使用容易导致耐药性,而生长因子并不能有效抑制伤口中的细菌生长和炎症。干细胞和基因治疗仍处于实验阶段。局部清创结合负压治疗的方法费用昂贵。因此,我们迫切需要一种负担得起的、非手术方法来治疗糖尿病溃疡。紫荆皮、白芍、白芷(Hoffm.)Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.(Hoffm.)Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.、菖蒲和当归二皮的提取物已被用作治疗炎症相关疾病和皮肤伤口的传统药物,因为它们具有抗炎特性和促进血管更新的能力。然而,关于这五种草药提取物混合物对糖尿病创面愈合的研究很少。
本研究旨在评估上述五种草药提取物混合物对大鼠糖尿病溃疡的愈合作用,并通过转录组学和蛋白质组学揭示任何潜在的伤口愈合的潜在机制。
我们设计了实验,通过体内实验探讨五种草药提取物对糖尿病伤口愈合过程的影响,并通过蛋白质组学和转录组学来研究潜在的机制。
我们使用上述五种草药提取物的混合物治疗由链脲佐菌素腹腔注射建立的大鼠糖尿病模型,在大鼠背部制作一个 2×2 cm 的全厚皮肤缺损。将 1 ml 浓度为 1.5×10 cfu/ml 的金黄色葡萄球菌均匀涂抹在伤口上。观察 72 h。如果伤口发现感染了金黄色葡萄球菌,则认为成功建立了糖尿病大鼠感染性溃疡模型。根据不同的药物治疗,将大鼠分为三种组,即草药混合物(MHE)、康复新液(KFS)和对照(Ctrl)。观察药物对伤口愈合的影响。进行 HE 染色和 Masson 染色,评估组织病理学变化和胶原合成。免疫组化染色评估新生血管形成,通过免疫荧光染色检测 M2 巨噬细胞增殖。进行蛋白质组学和转录组学研究,探讨五种草药提取物促进伤口愈合的潜在机制。采用 UHPLC-QE-MS 鉴定混合物中化学组成。
研究表明,混合草药提取物促进血管生成、M2 巨噬细胞增殖和胶原合成。转录组学研究表明,rno-miR-1298、rno-miR-144-5p 和 rno-miR-92a-1-5p 是重要的 miRNA,在调节伤口愈合中也发挥着重要作用。蛋白质组学结果表明,在 MHE 处理的伤口中,以下蛋白质是重要的:Rack1、LOC100362366、Cops2、Cops6、Eif4e、Eif3c、Rpl12、Srp54、Rpl13 和 Lsm7。与其他组相比,MHE 治疗后,自噬、PI3-Akt 和 mTOR 信号通路被富集。
在此,我们表明含有紫荆皮、白芍、白芷(Hoffm.)Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.(Hoffm.)Benth. & Hook.f. ex Franch. & Sav.、菖蒲和当归二皮提取物的 MHE 对糖尿病溃疡伤口大鼠模型具有显著的伤口愈合作用。这些结果表明,局部应用 MHE 可加速糖尿病伤口的愈合过程。此外,体内实验表明,糖尿病伤口愈合过程主要是通过血管生成和 M2 巨噬细胞转化介导的。因此,这项研究可能为加速糖尿病伤口愈合提供一种有前景的非手术治疗策略,从而减少糖尿病患者的截肢数量。