Suppr超能文献

对组织架构、遗传学、表观遗传学和细胞代谢在癌症发生中的相对贡献进行批判性评估。

A critical appraisal of the relative contribution of tissue architecture, genetics, epigenetics and cell metabolism to carcinogenesis.

机构信息

Cell Signaling and Metabolism Networks Program, Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1090, Vienna, Austria; Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, 1090, Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 2023 Sep;182:26-33. doi: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2023.05.004. Epub 2023 Jun 1.

Abstract

Here we contrast several carcinogenesis models. The somatic-mutation-theory posits mutations as main causes of malignancy. However, inconsistencies led to alternative explanations. For example, the tissue-organization-field-theory considers disrupted tissue-architecture as main cause. Both models can be reconciled using systems-biology-approaches, according to which tumors hover in states of self-organized criticality between order and chaos, are emergent results of multiple deviations and are subject to general laws of nature: inevitable variation(mutation) explainable by increased entropy(second-law-of-thermodynamics) or indeterminate decoherence upon measurement of superposed quantum systems(quantum mechanics), followed by Darwinian-selection. Genomic expression is regulated by epigenetics. Both systems cooperate. So cancer is neither just a mutational nor an epigenetic problem. Rather, epigenetics links environmental cues to endogenous genetics engendering a regulatory machinery that encompasses specific cancer-metabolic-networks. Interestingly, mutations occur at all levels of this machinery (oncogenes/tumor-suppressors, epigenetic-modifiers, structure-genes, metabolic-genes). Therefore, in most cases, DNA mutations may be the initial and crucial cancer-promoting triggers.

摘要

在这里,我们对比了几种致癌模型。体细胞突变理论认为突变是恶性肿瘤的主要原因。然而,这些不一致性导致了替代解释。例如,组织组织场理论认为组织架构的破坏是主要原因。根据系统生物学方法,这两种模型可以得到协调,根据这种方法,肿瘤在秩序和混乱之间的自组织临界状态中徘徊,是多个偏差的突发结果,并受到自然普遍规律的制约:不可避免的变异(突变)可以用熵的增加(热力学第二定律)来解释,或者在对叠加量子系统进行测量时的不确定退相干(量子力学),随后是达尔文选择。基因组表达受表观遗传学调控。这两个系统相互合作。因此,癌症既不是突变问题,也不是表观遗传问题。相反,表观遗传学将环境线索与内源性遗传联系起来,产生了一个调控机制,其中包括特定的癌症代谢网络。有趣的是,突变发生在这个调控机制的所有层次(癌基因/肿瘤抑制基因、表观遗传修饰物、结构基因、代谢基因)。因此,在大多数情况下,DNA 突变可能是最初和关键的促进癌症的触发因素。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验