BACKGROUND

We previously developed an automated approach based on pace mapping to localise early left ventricular (LV) activation origin. To avoid a singular system, we require pacing from at least 2 more known sites than the number of electrocardiography (ECG) leads used. Fewer leads used means fewer pacing sites required. We sought to identify an optimal minimal ECG lead set for the automated approach.

METHODS

We used 1715 LV endocardial pacing sites to create derivation and testing data sets. The derivation data set, consisting of 1012 known pacing sites pooled from 38 patients, was used to identify an optimal 3-lead set by means of random forest regression (RFR), and a second 3-lead set by means of exhaustive search. The performance of these sets and the calculated Frank leads was compared within the testing data set with 703 pacing sites pooled from 25 patients.

RESULTS

The RFR yielded III, V1, and V4, whereas the exhaustive search identified leads II, V2 and V6. Comparison of these sets and the calculated Frank leads demonstrated similar performance when using 5 or more known pacing sites. Accuracy improved with additional pacing sites, achieving mean accuracy of < 5 mm, after including up to 9 pacing sites when they were focused on a suspected area of ventricular activation origin (radius < 10 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

The RFR identified the quasi-orthogonal leads set to localise the source of LV activation, minimizing the training set of pacing sites. Localization accuracy was high with the use of these leads and was not significantly different from using leads identified by exhaustive search or empiric use of Frank leads.