Gao Z X, Wang J, Wen A N, Zhu Y J, Qin Q Z, Wang Y, Zhao Y J
Center of Digital Dentistry, Faculty of Prosthodontics, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Research Center of Engineering and Technology for Computerized Dentistry Ministry of Health & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & National Engineering Research Center of Oral Biomaterials and Digital Medical Devices & Beijing Key Laboratory of Digital Stomatology, Beijing 100081, China.
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2023 Jun 9;58(6):554-560. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112144-20230218-00053.
To explore an automatic landmarking method for anatomical landmarks in the three-dimensional (3D) data of the maxillary complex and preliminarily evaluate its reproducibility and accuracy. From June 2021 to December 2022, spiral CT data of 31 patients with relatively normal craniofacial morphology were selected from those who visited the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology. The sample included 15 males and 16 females, with the age of (33.3±8.3) years. The maxillary complex was reconstructed in 3D using Mimics software, and the resulting 3D data of the maxillary complex was mesh-refined using Geomagic software. Two attending physicians and one associate chief physician manually landmarked the 31 maxillary complex datasets, determining 24 anatomical landmarks. The average values of the three expert landmarking results were used as the expert-defined landmarks. One case that conformed to the average 3D morphological characteristics of healthy individuals' craniofacial bones was selected as the template data, while the remaining 30 cases were used as target data. The open-source MeshMonk program (a non-rigid registration algorithm) was used to perform an initial alignment of the template and target data based on 4 landmarks (nasion, left and right zygomatic arch prominence, and anterior nasal spine). The template data was then deformed to the shape of the target data using a non-rigid registration algorithm, resulting in the deformed template data. Based on the unchanged index property of homonymous landmarks before and after deformation of the template data, the coordinates of each landmark in the deformed template data were automatically retrieved as the automatic landmarking coordinates of the homonymous landmarks in the target data, thus completing the automatic landmarking process. The automatic landmarking process for the 30 target data was repeated three times. The root-mean-square distance (RMSD) of the dense corresponding point pairs (approximately 25 000 pairs) between the deformed template data and the target data was calculated as the deformation error of the non-rigid registration algorithm, and the intra-class correlation coefficient () of the deformation error in the three repetitions was analyzed. The linear distances between the automatic landmarking results and the expert-defined landmarks for the 24 anatomical landmarks were calculated as the automatic landmarking errors, and the values of the 3D coordinates in the three automatic landmarking repetitions were analyzed. The average three-dimensional deviation (RMSD) between the deformed template data and the corresponding target data for the 30 cases was (0.70±0.09) mm, with an value of 1.00 for the deformation error in the three repetitions of the non-rigid registration algorithm. The average automatic landmarking error for the 24 anatomical landmarks was (1.86±0.30) mm, with the smallest error at the anterior nasal spine (0.65±0.24) mm and the largest error at the left oribital (3.27±2.28) mm. The values for the 3D coordinates in the three automatic landmarking repetitions were all 1.00. This study established an automatic landmarking method for three-dimensional data of the maxillary complex based on a non-rigid registration algorithm. The accuracy and repeatability of this method for landmarking normal maxillary complex 3D data were relatively good.
探索一种用于上颌复合体三维(3D)数据中解剖标志点的自动标记方法,并初步评估其可重复性和准确性。2021年6月至2022年12月,从北京大学口腔医学院口腔颌面外科就诊的患者中选取31例颅面形态相对正常的患者的螺旋CT数据。样本包括15名男性和16名女性,年龄为(33.3±8.3)岁。使用Mimics软件对上颌复合体进行三维重建,并使用Geomagic软件对所得的上颌复合体三维数据进行网格细化。两名主治医师和一名副主任医师对上颌复合体的31个数据集进行手动标记,确定24个解剖标志点。将三位专家标记结果的平均值用作专家定义的标志点。选择1例符合健康个体颅面骨平均三维形态特征的病例作为模板数据,其余30例作为目标数据。使用开源的MeshMonk程序(一种非刚性配准算法)基于4个标志点(鼻根点、左右颧弓突出点和前鼻棘)对模板数据和目标数据进行初始对齐。然后使用非刚性配准算法将模板数据变形为目标数据的形状,得到变形后的模板数据。基于模板数据变形前后同名标志点的指标属性不变,自动获取变形后模板数据中各标志点的坐标作为目标数据中同名标志点的自动标记坐标,从而完成自动标记过程。对30个目标数据的自动标记过程重复进行三次。计算变形后模板数据与目标数据之间密集对应点对(约25000对)的均方根距离(RMSD)作为非刚性配准算法的变形误差,并分析三次重复中变形误差的组内相关系数()。计算24个解剖标志点的自动标记结果与专家定义标志点之间的线性距离作为自动标记误差,并分析三次自动标记重复中三维坐标的 值。30例病例变形后模板数据与相应目标数据之间的平均三维偏差(RMSD)为(0.70±0.09)mm,非刚性配准算法三次重复中变形误差的 值为1.00。24个解剖标志点的平均自动标记误差为(1.86±0.30)mm,前鼻棘处误差最小(0.65±0.24)mm,左眶处误差最大(3.27±2.28)mm。三次自动标记重复中三维坐标的 值均为1.00。本研究建立了一种基于非刚性配准算法的上颌复合体三维数据自动标记方法。该方法对正常上颌复合体三维数据进行标记的准确性和可重复性相对较好。