• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国社区及临床人群中的跨文化研究。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
2
Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals.阿拉伯联合酋长国国民社区样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表(PID-5)的阿拉伯语版本。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2020 Jul 30;16:180-188. doi: 10.2174/1745017902016010180. eCollection 2020.
3
The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals.《DSM-5 人格障碍检查表的阿拉伯文版(PID-5)在阿联酋国民的临床样本中的应用》。
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Nov 1;44(6):794-806. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.6.5.
4
The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.DSM-5 人格问卷的葡萄牙文版在社区和临床样本中的应用。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1437. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
5
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 across U.S. East Asian, Southeast Asian, and White participants.DSM-5 人格问卷在美国东亚裔、东南亚裔和白种人群体中的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/per0000647. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
6
Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Clinical Versus Nonclinical Individuals: Generalizability of Psychometric Features.DSM-5 人格障碍检查表(PID-5)在临床个体与非临床个体中的应用:心理计量学特征的可推广性。
Assessment. 2018 Oct;25(7):815-825. doi: 10.1177/1073191117709070. Epub 2017 May 13.
7
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
8
An examination of the cross-cultural equivalence of the personality inventory for DSM-5 across Chinese and U.S. samples.DSM-5 人格量表跨中、美样本的跨文化等同性研究。
Psychol Assess. 2024 Feb;36(2):102-113. doi: 10.1037/pas0001293. Epub 2023 Dec 21.
9
Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.DSM-5 人格量表的跨文化测量不变性。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Oct;304:114134. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114134. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
10
The Portuguese version of the self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR) in a community and clinical sample.《DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表(LPFS-SR)自陈式量表的葡萄牙语版:社区和临床样本》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0300706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300706. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
The Portuguese version of the self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR) in a community and clinical sample.《DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表(LPFS-SR)自陈式量表的葡萄牙语版:社区和临床样本》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0300706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300706. eCollection 2024.
2
The underlying structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): a general factor of personality psychopathology.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)的潜在结构:人格精神病理学的一个一般因素。
Curr Issues Personal Psychol. 2023 Jun 1;12(2):79-90. doi: 10.5114/cipp/163182. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance in the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.DSM-5 人格量表的跨文化测量不变性。
Psychiatry Res. 2021 Oct;304:114134. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2021.114134. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
2
Validity, reliability and hierarchical structure of the PID-5 among Egyptian college students: Using exploratory structural equation modelling.PID-5 在埃及大学生中的有效性、可靠性和层次结构:使用探索性结构方程建模。
Personal Ment Health. 2021 May;15(2):100-112. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1497. Epub 2020 Nov 17.
3
The Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample of United Arab Emirates (UAE) Nationals.《DSM-5 人格障碍检查表的阿拉伯文版(PID-5)在阿联酋国民的临床样本中的应用》。
Am J Health Behav. 2020 Nov 1;44(6):794-806. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.44.6.5.
4
Cross-cultural applicability of ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality disorder.ICD-11 和 DSM-5 人格障碍的跨文化适用性。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2021 Jan;34(1):70-75. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000659.
5
Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals.阿拉伯联合酋长国国民社区样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表(PID-5)的阿拉伯语版本。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2020 Jul 30;16:180-188. doi: 10.2174/1745017902016010180. eCollection 2020.
6
What Does Personality Mean in the Context of Mental Health? A Topic Modeling Approach Based on Abstracts Published in Pubmed Over the Last 5 Years.在心理健康背景下,人格意味着什么?一种基于过去五年发表在PubMed上的摘要的主题建模方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 9;10:938. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00938. eCollection 2019.
7
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
8
The prevalence of personality disorders in the community: a global systematic review and meta-analysis.社区人群中人格障碍的患病率:全球系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2020 Feb;216(2):69-78. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2019.166.
9
The replicability of the personality inventory for DSM-5 domain scale factor structure in U.S. and non-U.S. samples: A quantitative review of the published literature.DSM-5 域量表因子结构人格量表在美国和非美国样本中的可重复性:已发表文献的定量综述。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Jul;31(7):861-877. doi: 10.1037/pas0000711. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
10
The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.DSM-5 人格问卷的葡萄牙文版在社区和临床样本中的应用。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1437. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国社区及临床人群中的跨文化研究。

Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.

作者信息

Coelho Olga, Pires Rute, Ferreira Ana Sousa, Gonçalves Bruno, Alkhoori Samia A, Sayed Mohamed, ElRasheed Amany, AlJassmi Maryam, Henriques-Calado Joana, Stocker Joana

机构信息

CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal.

Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal.

出版信息

Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130
PMID:37274845
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10156022/
Abstract

AIMS

The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.

BACKGROUND

The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.

OBJECTIVES

We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.

METHODS

The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants ( = 300, 80% women and 20% men, = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants ( = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE ( = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, = 31.29) and Portugal ( = 150, 52% men and 48% women, = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.

RESULTS

Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.

CONCLUSION

Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.

摘要

目的

本文着重比较葡萄牙和阿联酋两个匹配的社区及临床样本中PID - 5的平均得分水平。

背景

通过《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID - 5),已在不同国家和语言中对人格障碍替代模型的普遍性和通用性进行了深入研究。然而,比较西方国家和中东国家的研究仍然有限,特别是那些评估PID - 5测量不变性的研究。

目标

我们检验了PID - 5量表在匹配的阿联酋和葡萄牙临床及非临床组中的测量不变性,并比较和对比了两国及样本中PID - 5的平均得分水平。

方法

将PID - 5的阿拉伯语和葡萄牙语版本施测于阿联酋社区参与者(n = 300,80%为女性,20%为男性,M = 27.95),他们与葡萄牙社区参与者(n = 300,80.3%为女性,19.7%为男性,M = 28.96)相匹配,还有阿联酋的临床参与者(n = 150,61.3%为女性,38.7%为男性,M = 31.29)和葡萄牙的临床参与者(n = 150,52%为男性,48%为女性,M = 44.97)。我们通过基于无限制因子分析的程序检验测量不变性,并对平均得分水平进行比较和分析。

结果

我们的研究结果支持了PID - 5在阿联酋和葡萄牙临床样本中的测量不变性,表明人格障碍替代模型具有普遍性和通用性。阿联酋的精神科样本在某些方面的结果高于葡萄牙的精神科参与者,尽管大多数PID - 5量表的效应量较小。

结论

需要进一步研究以检验PID - 5在葡萄牙、阿联酋及其他中东国家的非临床代表性样本中的适用性。