Coelho Olga, Pires Rute, Ferreira Ana Sousa, Gonçalves Bruno, Alkhoori Samia A, Sayed Mohamed, ElRasheed Amany, AlJassmi Maryam, Henriques-Calado Joana, Stocker Joana
CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal.
Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013 Lisboa, Portugal.
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
The present paper focused on compare the PID-5 mean score levels across two matched community and clinical samples of Portugal and the UAE.
The generalizability and universality of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders has been thoroughly studied through the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) across countries and languages. However, studies comparing Western and Middle Eastern countries are still limited, in particular those who assess the PID-5 measurement invariance.
We examined measurement invariance of the PID-5 scales across matched Emirati and Portuguese clinical and nonclinical groups, as well as compare and contrast the PID-5 mean score levels across both countries and samples.
The Arabic and the Portuguese versions of the PID-5 was administered to Emirati community participants ( = 300, 80% women and 20% men, = 27.95) which were matched with Portuguese community participants ( = 300, 80.3% women and 19.7% men, = 28.96), as well as clinical participants of the UAE ( = 150, 61.3% women and 38.7% men, = 31.29) and Portugal ( = 150, 52% men and 48% women, = 44.97). We examined measurement invariance through an unrestricted Factor Analysis based program, and mean scores levels were compared and analyzed.
Our findings supported the PID-5 measurement invariance across the Emirati and Portuguese clinical samples pointing to the universality and generalizability of the Alternative Model of Personality Disorders. The Emirati psychiatric sample exhibited somehow higher results than the Portuguese psychiatric participants, albeit the small effect size for most of the PID-5 scales.
Further research is needed to examine the applicability of the PID-5 across non-clinical representative samples of Portugal and the UAE, and other Middle Eastern countries.
本文着重比较葡萄牙和阿联酋两个匹配的社区及临床样本中PID - 5的平均得分水平。
通过《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID - 5),已在不同国家和语言中对人格障碍替代模型的普遍性和通用性进行了深入研究。然而,比较西方国家和中东国家的研究仍然有限,特别是那些评估PID - 5测量不变性的研究。
我们检验了PID - 5量表在匹配的阿联酋和葡萄牙临床及非临床组中的测量不变性,并比较和对比了两国及样本中PID - 5的平均得分水平。
将PID - 5的阿拉伯语和葡萄牙语版本施测于阿联酋社区参与者(n = 300,80%为女性,20%为男性,M = 27.95),他们与葡萄牙社区参与者(n = 300,80.3%为女性,19.7%为男性,M = 28.96)相匹配,还有阿联酋的临床参与者(n = 150,61.3%为女性,38.7%为男性,M = 31.29)和葡萄牙的临床参与者(n = 150,52%为男性,48%为女性,M = 44.97)。我们通过基于无限制因子分析的程序检验测量不变性,并对平均得分水平进行比较和分析。
我们的研究结果支持了PID - 5在阿联酋和葡萄牙临床样本中的测量不变性,表明人格障碍替代模型具有普遍性和通用性。阿联酋的精神科样本在某些方面的结果高于葡萄牙的精神科参与者,尽管大多数PID - 5量表的效应量较小。
需要进一步研究以检验PID - 5在葡萄牙、阿联酋及其他中东国家的非临床代表性样本中的适用性。