• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 人格障碍检查表(PID-5)在临床个体与非临床个体中的应用:心理计量学特征的可推广性。

Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Clinical Versus Nonclinical Individuals: Generalizability of Psychometric Features.

机构信息

1 Center of Excellence on Personality Disorder, Psychiatric Research Unit, Psychiatric Hospital Slagelse, Slagelse, Denmark.

2 University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.

出版信息

Assessment. 2018 Oct;25(7):815-825. doi: 10.1177/1073191117709070. Epub 2017 May 13.

DOI:10.1177/1073191117709070
PMID:28503935
Abstract

The Personality Inventory for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-Fifth Edition (PID-5) was developed for the assessment of pathological traits in clinical settings. However, most research on the PID-5 is derived from nonclinical samples. To date, the comparability and generalizability of PID-5 constructs across nonclinical and clinical samples have not been adequately investigated. Therefore, we investigated the measurement invariance, five-factor structure, and factor correlations across clinical and nonclinical samples. The clinical sample ( n = 598) comprised patients with nonpsychotic disorders (81% women; mean age = 28.95), whereas a matched nonclinical sample ( n = 598) comprised community-dwelling individuals (81% women; mean age = 29.59). Measurement invariance was analyzed using a 13-step, two-group exploratory structural equation modeling approach. The results demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties for both samples and supported strong measurement invariance across the groups at the domain level.

摘要

人格障碍诊断与统计手册第五版量表(PID-5)是为临床环境下病理性特质的评估而开发的。然而,PID-5 的大多数研究都来自非临床样本。迄今为止,PID-5 结构在非临床和临床样本中的可比性和可推广性尚未得到充分研究。因此,我们研究了临床和非临床样本之间的测量不变性、五因素结构和因素相关性。临床样本(n=598)包括非精神病障碍患者(81%为女性;平均年龄=28.95),而匹配的非临床样本(n=598)包括社区居住者(81%为女性;平均年龄=29.59)。使用 13 步、两组探索性结构方程建模方法分析测量不变性。结果表明,两个样本都具有良好的心理计量学特性,并支持组间在域水平上具有很强的测量不变性。

相似文献

1
Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in Clinical Versus Nonclinical Individuals: Generalizability of Psychometric Features.DSM-5 人格障碍检查表(PID-5)在临床个体与非临床个体中的应用:心理计量学特征的可推广性。
Assessment. 2018 Oct;25(7):815-825. doi: 10.1177/1073191117709070. Epub 2017 May 13.
2
The psychometric properties of the personality inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 field trial sample.DSM-5 人格量表在 APA DSM-5 现场试验样本中的心理计量特性。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):362-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486183. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
3
Measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 across U.S. East Asian, Southeast Asian, and White participants.DSM-5 人格问卷在美国东亚裔、东南亚裔和白种人群体中的测量不变性。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):1-10. doi: 10.1037/per0000647. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
4
Personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form(PID-5-BF) in Chinese students and patients: evaluating the five-factor model and a culturally informed six-factor model.中文学生和患者的 DSM-5 简短形式人格量表(PID-5-BF):评估五因素模型和具有文化意义的六因素模型。
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):107. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03080-x.
5
The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍特质替代标准:丹麦人群中三种自我报告形式的比较研究
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):124-35. doi: 10.1037/per0000162. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
6
Hierarchical Structure and Cross-Cultural Measurement Invariance of the Norwegian Version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版挪威版人格量表的层次结构与跨文化测量不变性
J Pers Assess. 2017 Mar-Apr;99(2):204-210. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2016.1223682. Epub 2016 Sep 23.
7
The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Short Form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population.DSM-5 短式人格量表(PID-5-SF):在挪威人群中与大五人格特质和病理性信念的心理测量学特征及关联。
BMC Psychol. 2016 Dec 7;4(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5.
8
Examining Measurement Invariance in the Personality Inventory for -5 Brief Form Across Sexual and Gender Minority Status.检验性少数和性别少数群体状态下的 -5 项简短人格量表的测量不变性。
Assessment. 2024 Apr;31(3):678-697. doi: 10.1177/10731911231176449. Epub 2023 May 29.
9
A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5.DSM-5 人格量表五因素内部结构的元分析。
Psychol Assess. 2018 Sep;30(9):1255-1260. doi: 10.1037/pas0000605. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
10
Clarifying the interstitial nature of facets from the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 using the five factor model of personality.使用 DSM-5 人格量表的五因素模型来澄清人格障碍检查表的特质间性质。
Personal Disord. 2019 Jul;10(4):330-339. doi: 10.1037/per0000327. Epub 2019 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Emotion Dysregulation in College Students: Contributions of Maladaptive Personality Traits and Momentary Affect.大学生的情绪失调:适应不良人格特质和瞬间情绪的影响
J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2025;47(3):65. doi: 10.1007/s10862-025-10243-7. Epub 2025 Aug 4.
2
The Portuguese version of the self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR) in a community and clinical sample.《DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表(LPFS-SR)自陈式量表的葡萄牙语版:社区和临床样本》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0300706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300706. eCollection 2024.
3
Connecting loneliness with pathological personality traits: Evidence for genetic and environmental mediation from a study of older twins.
将孤独感与病态人格特质联系起来:来自老年双胞胎研究的遗传和环境中介的证据。
Personal Disord. 2024 Jan;15(1):34-45. doi: 10.1037/per0000635. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
4
Assessing the measurement invariance of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 across Black and White americans.评估 DSM-5 人格量表在黑人和白种美国人中的测量不变性。
Psychol Assess. 2023 Sep;35(9):721-728. doi: 10.1037/pas0001255. Epub 2023 Jun 29.
5
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国社区及临床人群中的跨文化研究。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
6
Structure of Pathological Personality Traits Through the Lens of the CAT-PD Model.通过 CAT-PD 模型透视病理性人格特质的结构。
Assessment. 2023 Oct;30(7):2276-2295. doi: 10.1177/10731911221143343. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5-paper-and-pencil version.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版纸笔版人格问卷巴西版本的心理测量研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 13;13:976831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976831. eCollection 2022.
8
Reliability and validity of the Hungarian version of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5).《人格障碍诊断与统计手册第 5 版人格量表(PID-5)匈牙利语版的信度和效度》。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 14;17(7):e0266201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266201. eCollection 2022.
9
Maladaptive personality traits may link childhood trauma history to current internalizing symptoms.适应不良的人格特质可能会将童年创伤史与当前的内化症状联系起来。
Scand J Psychol. 2022 Oct;63(5):468-475. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12830. Epub 2022 May 23.
10
Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in China: Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 Trait Structure and Continuity With Personality Disorder Types.《中国版DSM-5人格量表:DSM-5与ICD-11特质结构评估及与人格障碍类型的连续性》
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 26;12:635214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635214. eCollection 2021.