• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DSM-5 人格问卷的葡萄牙文版在社区和临床样本中的应用。

The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.

机构信息

Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013, Lisbon, Portugal.

CICPSI, Faculdade de Psicologia, Universidade de Lisboa, Alameda da Universidade, 1649-013, Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1437. Epub 2018 Nov 19.

DOI:10.1002/pmh.1437
PMID:30456905
Abstract

The Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) measures the maladaptive traits of the model for personality and its disorders, as proposed in section III of the DSM-5. The current study aimed to examine whether the Portuguese PID-5 distinguished non-clinical participants (N = 1223, M  = 36.73, standard deviation = 15.72) from clinical participants (N = 202, M  = 43.82, standard deviation = 11.33) with respect to dysfunctional personality traits and to explore the PID-5 factor structure in both samples. The PID-5 scale medians were higher in the clinical sample than in the community sample. All analyses were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001) with medium size effects. In the community sample, a five-factor structure emerged, and the factors resembled the PID-5 domains. However, in the clinical sample, a four-factor structure was retained, in which the Psychoticism domain did not clearly emerge. The composition of the clinical sample along with its small size may account for these unexpected results. Overall, the results provide evidence of the PID-5's ability to distinguish between psychiatric and community individuals and of the model's structural similarity in community samples, across studies and nationalities. More research is required to understand the Portuguese PID-5 structure in clinical samples. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

摘要

DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)测量了 DSM-5 第三部分所提出的人格障碍模型的适应不良特征。本研究旨在检验葡萄牙语版 PID-5 是否能区分非临床参与者(N=1223,M=36.73,标准差=15.72)和临床参与者(N=202,M=43.82,标准差=11.33)的功能失调人格特征,并探讨这两个样本中 PID-5 的因子结构。临床样本的 PID-5 量表中位数高于社区样本。所有分析均具有统计学意义(p≤0.001),效应量中等。在社区样本中,出现了五因子结构,各因子与 PID-5 领域相似。然而,在临床样本中,保留了四因子结构,其中精神病态领域没有明显出现。临床样本的组成及其样本量小可能导致了这些意外结果。总体而言,这些结果提供了 PID-5 区分精神科和社区个体的能力以及在社区样本中模型结构相似性的证据,这些结果在不同研究和国家中均成立。需要进一步的研究来了解临床样本中的葡萄牙语 PID-5 结构。© 2018 约翰威立父子公司

相似文献

1
The Portuguese version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample.DSM-5 人格问卷的葡萄牙文版在社区和临床样本中的应用。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):40-52. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1437. Epub 2018 Nov 19.
2
Evaluation of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality traits using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Brazilian sample of psychiatric inpatients.使用 DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)在巴西精神科住院患者样本中评估 DSM-5 和 ICD-11 人格特质。
Personal Ment Health. 2019 Feb;13(1):24-39. doi: 10.1002/pmh.1436. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
A Family Study of the Section III Personality Pathology Model Using the Personality Inventory for the (PID-5).采用《人格障碍检查表第五版》(PID-5)对 第三节人格病理学模型进行的家系研究。
J Pers Disord. 2018 Dec;32(6):753-765. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2017_31_323. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
4
The maladaptive personality traits of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation.DSM-5 人格量表(PID-5)的适应不良人格特质与 HEXACO 人格因素及精神分裂症/分离的关系。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Oct;26(5):641-59. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.641.
5
Testing relationships between DSM-5 Section III maladaptive traits and measures of self and interpersonal impairment in Italian community dwelling adults.测试《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版第三部分适应不良特质与意大利社区居住成年人的自我及人际功能损害指标之间的关系。
Personal Disord. 2017 Jul;8(3):275-280. doi: 10.1037/per0000192. Epub 2016 Jun 9.
6
A closer look at the lower-order structure of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5: comparison with the Five-Factor Model.深入探究《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表的低阶结构:与五因素模型的比较。
Personal Disord. 2014 Oct;5(4):406-12. doi: 10.1037/per0000074. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: A comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格障碍特质替代标准:丹麦人群中三种自我报告形式的比较研究
Personal Disord. 2016 Apr;7(2):124-35. doi: 10.1037/per0000162. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
8
Capturing the DSM-5 Alternative Personality Disorder Model Traits in the Five-Factor Model's Nomological Net.在五因素模型的概念网络中捕捉《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版的替代人格障碍模型特质。
J Pers. 2017 Apr;85(2):220-231. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12235. Epub 2016 Jan 29.
9
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
10
Conceptions of narcissism and the DSM-5 pathological personality traits.自恋观念与 DSM-5 病理性人格特质。
Assessment. 2013 Jun;20(3):339-52. doi: 10.1177/1073191113486692. Epub 2013 Apr 21.

引用本文的文献

1
The Portuguese version of the self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS-SR) in a community and clinical sample.《DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表(LPFS-SR)自陈式量表的葡萄牙语版:社区和临床样本》。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 27;19(6):e0300706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300706. eCollection 2024.
2
Operational definitions and measurement of externalizing behavior problems: An integrative review including research models and clinical diagnostic systems.外化行为问题的操作定义与测量:一项综合综述,涵盖研究模型与临床诊断系统
World J Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 19;13(6):278-297. doi: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i6.278.
3
Cross-cultural Study of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) across the Portuguese and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) Community and Clinical Populations.
《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版人格量表(PID-5)在葡萄牙和阿拉伯联合酋长国社区及临床人群中的跨文化研究。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2022 Aug 26;18:e174501792207130. doi: 10.2174/17450179-v18-e2207130. eCollection 2022.
4
Bridging the ICD11 and the DSM-5 personality disorders classification systems: The role of the PID5BF + M.弥合国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)与精神疾病诊断与统计手册第5版(DSM - 5)人格障碍分类系统之间的差距:人格障碍特质评定量表第5版简版(PID5BF + M)的作用
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 2;14:1004895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1004895. eCollection 2023.
5
Psychotic spectrum features in borderline and bipolar disorders within the scope of the DSM-5 section III personality traits: a case control study.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版第三部分人格特质范围内边缘性和双相情感障碍中的精神病性谱系特征:一项病例对照研究
Borderline Personal Disord Emot Dysregul. 2023 Jan 16;10(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s40479-022-00205-w.
6
Psychometric study of the brazilian version of the personality inventory for DSM-5-paper-and-pencil version.《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版纸笔版人格问卷巴西版本的心理测量研究
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Sep 13;13:976831. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.976831. eCollection 2022.
7
Psychometric Properties of the Independent 36-Item PID5BF+M for ICD-11 in the Czech-Speaking Community Sample.捷克语社区样本中用于国际疾病分类第11版(ICD - 11)的独立36项PID5BF + M的心理测量特性
Front Psychiatry. 2021 May 26;12:643270. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.643270. eCollection 2021.
8
Arabic Version of the Personality Inventory for the DSM-5 (PID-5) in a Community Sample of United Arab Emirates Nationals.阿拉伯联合酋长国国民社区样本中《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第5版人格量表(PID-5)的阿拉伯语版本。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2020 Jul 30;16:180-188. doi: 10.2174/1745017902016010180. eCollection 2020.