Suppr超能文献

共情失衡作为理解精神病理学个体差异的新框架。

Empathic disequilibrium as a new framework for understanding individual differences in psychopathology.

作者信息

Shalev Ido, Eran Alal, Uzefovsky Florina

机构信息

Psychology Department, Ben Gurion University, Beer-Sheba, Israel.

Computational Health Informatics Program, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2023 May 19;14:1153447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153447. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Empathy is part of basic social cognition and is central to everyday interactions. Indeed, emotional and cognitive empathy deficits are related to various psychopathologies, yet the links reported have been inconsistent. Thus, the mechanism underlying these inconsistent links is poorly understood. At least a partial answer may lie in that the dependency between cognitive and emotional empathy has been overlooked. Here, we examined the (dis)equilibrium between emotional and cognitive empathy and how it relates to individual differences in clinical traits. We further examined a possible mediator of these links-emotional reactivity.

METHODS

Participants ( = 425) from the general population reported on their empathy, emotional reactivity, autistic traits, psychopathic tendencies, and symptoms of depression and anxiety.

RESULTS

Beyond empathy, both extremes of empathic disequilibrium were associated with various features of clinical conditions; Higher emotional relative to cognitive empathy was related to the social domain of autism and anxiety, while higher cognitive relative to emotional empathy was related to the non-social domain of autism, depression symptoms, and psychopathic tendencies. The associations with autistic traits, anxiety, and psychopathic tendencies were mediated by emotional reactivity.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest a new framework for understanding how individual variability in empathy is expressed in various psychopathologies.

摘要

引言

同理心是基本社会认知的一部分,是日常互动的核心。事实上,情感同理心和认知同理心的缺陷与各种精神病理学有关,但所报告的联系并不一致。因此,这些不一致联系背后的机制尚不清楚。至少部分答案可能在于认知同理心和情感同理心之间的依赖性被忽视了。在这里,我们研究了情感同理心和认知同理心之间的(非)平衡以及它与临床特征个体差异的关系。我们还进一步研究了这些联系的一个可能中介因素——情绪反应性。

方法

来自普通人群的425名参与者报告了他们的同理心、情绪反应性、自闭症特征、精神病态倾向以及抑郁和焦虑症状。

结果

除了同理心本身,同理心失衡的两个极端都与临床状况的各种特征相关;相对于认知同理心,较高的情感同理心与自闭症和焦虑的社会领域相关,而相对于情感同理心,较高的认知同理心与自闭症的非社会领域、抑郁症状和精神病态倾向相关。与自闭症特征、焦虑和精神病态倾向的关联是由情绪反应性介导的。

讨论

我们的研究结果为理解同理心的个体差异如何在各种精神病理学中表现提供了一个新框架。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/35fe/10236526/766744d8fbf6/fpsyg-14-1153447-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验