Psychology Department, Toros University Bahçelievler District, Mersin, Turkey.
Medicine Department, Çukurova University Balcalı Hospital, Adana, Turkey.
BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Nov 28;24(1):858. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06324-8.
Previous studies have shown associations between internalizing and externalizing symptoms, executive functions, and empathy. However, the mechanisms that affect this relationship remain unclear. This study employed regression analysis to explore the relationships between empathy, executive functions, and internalizing and externalizing symptoms.
Our study consisted of three consecutive stages. In the first stage, we assessed 2150 adolescents' parents aged 10-12 using the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire to determine which participants should be included in the subsequent stages. In the second stage, we conducted a pilot study with 50 participants to assess the validity of the assessment system and the six film scenes to be used in the following stage. Finally, in the third stage, we obtained 170 participants' state empathy, trait empathy, and executive functioning.
The regression analysis showed that working memory (β = 0.261) and externalizing symptoms (β = -0.157) predicted cognitive empathy, but only externalizing symptoms predicted affective empathy (β = -0.193). The regression analysis also showed that cognitive empathy (β = -0.513) and affective empathy (β = -0.535) predicted externalizing symptoms, but only inhibition predicted internalizing symptoms (β = 0.158).
This population-based study highlights the reciprocal effects of externalizing symptoms on cognitive and affective empathy. No significant relationship was found between internalizing symptoms and empathy. This study also highlights the effect of working memory on cognitive empathy. These findings may inform psychological interventions to improve empathic abilities in early adolescence.
先前的研究表明,内化和外化症状、执行功能和同理心之间存在关联。然而,影响这种关系的机制尚不清楚。本研究采用回归分析探讨了同理心、执行功能与内化和外化症状之间的关系。
我们的研究包括三个连续阶段。在第一阶段,我们使用《长处和困难问卷》评估了 2150 名 10-12 岁青少年的父母,以确定哪些参与者应纳入后续阶段。在第二阶段,我们对 50 名参与者进行了一项试点研究,以评估评估系统和以下阶段将使用的六个电影场景的有效性。最后,在第三阶段,我们获得了 170 名参与者的状态同理心、特质同理心和执行功能。
回归分析表明,工作记忆(β=0.261)和外化症状(β=-0.157)预测认知同理心,但只有外化症状预测情感同理心(β=-0.193)。回归分析还表明,认知同理心(β=-0.513)和情感同理心(β=-0.535)预测外化症状,但只有抑制预测内化症状(β=0.158)。
这项基于人群的研究强调了外化症状对认知和情感同理心的相互影响。未发现内化症状与同理心之间存在显著关系。本研究还强调了工作记忆对认知同理心的影响。这些发现可能为改善青少年早期同理心能力的心理干预提供信息。