Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜和机器人腹疝修补术中肠切开的发生率和影响:全国再入院分析。

The incidence and impact of enterotomy during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide readmissions analysis.

机构信息

Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6385-6394. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09867-1. Epub 2023 Jun 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Our aim was to define the national incidence of enterotomy (ENT) during minimally invasive ventral hernia repair (MIS-VHR) and evaluate impact on short-term outcomes.

METHODS

The 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried using ICD-10 codes for MIS-VHR and enterotomy. All patients had 3-months follow-up. Patients were stratified by elective status; patients without ENT (No-ENT) were compared against ENT patients.

RESULTS

In total, 30,025 patients underwent LVHR and ENT occurred in 388 (1.3%) patients; 19,188 (63.9%) cases were elective including 244 elective-ENT patients. Incidence was similar between elective versus non-elective cohorts (1.27% vs 1.33%; p = 0.674). Compared to laparoscopy, ENT was more common during robotic procedures (1.2% vs 1.7%; p = 0.004). Comparison of elective-No-ENT vs elective-ENT showed that elective-ENT patients had a longer median LOS (2 vs 5 days; p < 0.001), higher mean hospital cost ($51,656 vs $76,466; p < 0.001), increased rates of mortality (0.3% vs 2.9%; p < 0.001), and higher 3-month readmission (10.1% vs 13.9%; p = 0.048). Non-elective cohort comparison demonstrated non-elective-ENT patients had a longer median LOS (4 vs 7 days; p < 0.001), higher mean hospital cost ($58,379 vs $87,850; p < 0.001), increased rates of mortality (0.7% vs 2.1%;p < 0.001), and higher 3-month readmission (13.6% vs 22.2%; p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 95% CI), higher odds of enterotomy were associated with robotic-assisted procedures (1.386, 1.095-1.754; p = 0.007) and older age (1.014, 1.004-1.024; p = 0.006). Lower odds of ENT were associated with BMI > 25 kg/m (0.784, 0.624-0.984; p = 0.036) and metropolitan teaching vs metropolitan non-teaching (0.784, 0.622-0.987; p = 0.044). ENT patients (n = 388) were more likely to be readmitted with post-operative infection (1.9% vs 4.1%; p = 0.002) or bowel obstruction (1.0% vs 5.2%;p < 0.001) and more likely to undergo reoperation for intestinal adhesions (0.3% vs 1.0%; p = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

Inadvertent ENT occurred in 1.3% of MIS-VHRs, had similar rates between elective and urgent cases, but was more common for robotic procedures. ENT patients had a longer LOS, and increased cost and infection, readmission, re-operation and mortality rates.

摘要

简介

本研究旨在明确微创腹侧疝修补术(MIS-VHR)期间肠切开术(ENT)的全国发病率,并评估其对短期结果的影响。

方法

使用 ICD-10 编码对 2016-2018 年全国再入院数据库进行查询,以获取 MIS-VHR 和 ENT 的信息。所有患者均有 3 个月的随访。患者根据手术的紧急程度分为择期手术和非择期手术;将无 ENT 患者(无 ENT 组)与 ENT 患者进行比较。

结果

共 30025 例患者接受了 LVHR,ENT 发生在 388 例(1.3%)患者中;19188 例(63.9%)为择期手术,包括 244 例择期 ENT 患者。择期手术与非择期手术组 ENT 的发生率相似(1.27% vs 1.33%;p=0.674)。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术中 ENT 更为常见(1.2% vs 1.7%;p=0.004)。择期-无 ENT 组与择期-ENT 组的比较显示,择期-ENT 组患者的中位 LOS 更长(2 天 vs 5 天;p<0.001),平均住院费用更高(51656 美元 vs 76466 美元;p<0.001),死亡率更高(0.3% vs 2.9%;p<0.001),3 个月再入院率更高(10.1% vs 13.9%;p=0.048)。非择期手术组的比较显示,非择期-ENT 组患者的中位 LOS 更长(4 天 vs 7 天;p<0.001),平均住院费用更高(58379 美元 vs 87850 美元;p<0.001),死亡率更高(0.7% vs 2.1%;p<0.001),3 个月再入院率更高(13.6% vs 22.2%;p<0.001)。多变量分析(比值比,95%CI)显示,机器人辅助手术(1.386,1.095-1.754;p=0.007)和年龄较大(1.014,1.004-1.024;p=0.006)与 ENT 的发生几率更高相关。ENT 发生几率较低与 BMI>25kg/m(0.784,0.624-0.984;p=0.036)和大都市教学医院与大都市非教学医院(0.784,0.622-0.987;p=0.044)相关。ENT 患者(n=388)更有可能因术后感染(1.9% vs 4.1%;p=0.002)或肠阻塞(1.0% vs 5.2%;p<0.001)而再次入院,并且更有可能因肠粘连而行再次手术(0.3% vs 1.0%;p=0.036)。

结论

微创腹侧疝修补术中发生意外肠切开术的几率为 1.3%,择期手术和紧急手术之间的发生率相似,但机器人手术更为常见。ENT 患者的 LOS 较长,且感染、再入院、再次手术和死亡率的发生率更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验