Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4653-4660. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07894-w. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
The merits of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (OPPVHR) have been debated for more than 2 decades. Our aim was to determine peri-operative and long-term outcomes in large hernias.
A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing LVHR and OPPVHR. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for hernia defect size and follow-up.
Three hundred and fifty-two LVHR and OPPVHR patients were identified with defect sizes closely matched between laparoscopic (182.0 ± 110.0 cm) and open repairs (178.3 ± 99.8 cm), p = 0.64. LVHR and OPPVHR patients were comparable: mean age 57.2 ± 12.1 vs 56.6 ± 12.0 years (p = 0.52), BMI: 32.9 ± 6.6 vs 32.0 ± 7.4 kg/m (p = 0.16), diabetes 19.0% vs 19.7% (p = 0.87), and smoking history 8.7% vs 23.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. OPPVHR had higher number of recurrent hernias (14.2% vs 44.9%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (168.1 ± 64.3 vs 186.7 ± 67.7 min, p = 0.006), and more components separation (0% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001). Mean mesh size was larger (p < 0.001) in the open group (634.4 ± 243.4 cm vs 841.8 ± 277.6 cm). The hernia recurrence rates were similar (10.8% vs 9.2%, p = 0.62), with average follow-up of 39.3 ± 32.5 vs 40.0 ± 35.0 months (p = 0.89). Length of stay was higher in the OVHR cohort (5.4 ± 3.0 vs 6.3 ± 3.6 days, p < 0.001), but 30-day readmission rates (4.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.31) were similar. Overall wound infection rate (2.9% vs 8.4%, p = 0.03) was higher in the OPPVHR group, but the mesh infection rate was similar between LVHR (1.7%) and OPPVHR (0.6%) (p = 0.33). Postoperative pain (41.1% vs 41.4%, p = 0.95) and overall QOL based on the Carolinas Comfort Scale at 6 months (p = 0.73) and 5-years (p = 0.36) were similar.
Laparoscopic and open preperitoneal repair for large ventral hernias have equivalent hernia recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and QOL on long-term follow-up. Patients undergoing OPPVHR were more likely to be recurrent, complex, require components separation, and more likely to develop postoperative wound complications.
腹腔镜(LVHR)和开放式腹膜前前修补术(OPPVHR)在 20 多年来一直存在争议。我们的目的是确定大型疝的围手术期和长期结果。
在一个三级疝中心的前瞻性机构数据库中,对接受 LVHR 和 OPPVHR 的患者进行了查询。对于疝缺损大小和随访,进行了一对一的倾向评分匹配。
共确定了 352 例 LVHR 和 OPPVHR 患者,腹腔镜(182.0±110.0 cm)和开放修复(178.3±99.8 cm)之间的疝缺损大小紧密匹配,p=0.64。LVHR 和 OPPVHR 患者之间具有可比性:平均年龄 57.2±12.1 岁对 56.6±12.0 岁(p=0.52),BMI:32.9±6.6 对 32.0±7.4 kg/m(p=0.16),糖尿病 19.0%对 19.7%(p=0.87),吸烟史 8.7%对 23.0%(p<0.001)。OPPVHR 具有更高的复发性疝(14.2%对 44.9%,p<0.001),更长的手术时间(168.1±64.3 对 186.7±67.7 分钟,p=0.006)和更多的组件分离(0%对 20.3%,p<0.001)。开放组的网片尺寸更大(p<0.001)(634.4±243.4 cm 对 841.8±277.6 cm)。疝复发率相似(10.8%对 9.2%,p=0.62),平均随访时间为 39.3±32.5 对 40.0±35.0 个月(p=0.89)。OPVHR 队列的住院时间更长(5.4±3.0 对 6.3±3.6 天,p<0.001),但 30 天再入院率(4.0%对 6.4%,p=0.31)相似。总体伤口感染率(2.9%对 8.4%,p=0.03)在 OPPVHR 组更高,但 LVHR(1.7%)和 OPPVHR(0.6%)之间的网片感染率相似(p=0.33)。术后疼痛(41.1%对 41.4%,p=0.95)和基于卡罗莱纳舒适度量表的总体 QOL 在 6 个月(p=0.73)和 5 年(p=0.36)时相似。
腹腔镜和开放式腹膜前前修补术治疗大型腹疝的疝复发率、术后疼痛和 QOL 在长期随访中相似。接受 OPPVHR 的患者更有可能复发、复杂、需要组件分离,并且更有可能发生术后伤口并发症。