Suppr超能文献

腹腔镜与开放腹侧疝修补术真的可比吗?:大腹侧疝的倾向匹配研究。

Are laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs truly comparable?: A propensity-matched study in large ventral hernias.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Gastrointestinal and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, 1025 Morehead Medical Drive Suite 300, Charlotte, NC, 28204, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Aug;35(8):4653-4660. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07894-w. Epub 2020 Aug 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The merits of laparoscopic (LVHR) and open preperitoneal ventral hernia repair (OPPVHR) have been debated for more than 2 decades. Our aim was to determine peri-operative and long-term outcomes in large hernias.

METHODS

A prospective, institutional database at a tertiary hernia center was queried for patients undergoing LVHR and OPPVHR. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed for hernia defect size and follow-up.

RESULTS

Three hundred and fifty-two LVHR and OPPVHR patients were identified with defect sizes closely matched between laparoscopic (182.0 ± 110.0 cm) and open repairs (178.3 ± 99.8 cm), p = 0.64. LVHR and OPPVHR patients were comparable: mean age 57.2 ± 12.1 vs 56.6 ± 12.0 years (p = 0.52), BMI: 32.9 ± 6.6 vs 32.0 ± 7.4 kg/m (p = 0.16), diabetes 19.0% vs 19.7% (p = 0.87), and smoking history 8.7% vs 23.0% (p < 0.001), respectively. OPPVHR had higher number of recurrent hernias (14.2% vs 44.9%, p < 0.001), longer operative time (168.1 ± 64.3 vs 186.7 ± 67.7 min, p = 0.006), and more components separation (0% vs 20.3%, p < 0.001). Mean mesh size was larger (p < 0.001) in the open group (634.4 ± 243.4 cm vs 841.8 ± 277.6 cm). The hernia recurrence rates were similar (10.8% vs 9.2%, p = 0.62), with average follow-up of 39.3 ± 32.5 vs 40.0 ± 35.0 months (p = 0.89). Length of stay was higher in the OVHR cohort (5.4 ± 3.0 vs 6.3 ± 3.6 days, p < 0.001), but 30-day readmission rates (4.0% vs 6.4%, p = 0.31) were similar. Overall wound infection rate (2.9% vs 8.4%, p = 0.03) was higher in the OPPVHR group, but the mesh infection rate was similar between LVHR (1.7%) and OPPVHR (0.6%) (p = 0.33). Postoperative pain (41.1% vs 41.4%, p = 0.95) and overall QOL based on the Carolinas Comfort Scale at 6 months (p = 0.73) and 5-years (p = 0.36) were similar.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic and open preperitoneal repair for large ventral hernias have equivalent hernia recurrence rates, postoperative pain, and QOL on long-term follow-up. Patients undergoing OPPVHR were more likely to be recurrent, complex, require components separation, and more likely to develop postoperative wound complications.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜(LVHR)和开放式腹膜前前修补术(OPPVHR)在 20 多年来一直存在争议。我们的目的是确定大型疝的围手术期和长期结果。

方法

在一个三级疝中心的前瞻性机构数据库中,对接受 LVHR 和 OPPVHR 的患者进行了查询。对于疝缺损大小和随访,进行了一对一的倾向评分匹配。

结果

共确定了 352 例 LVHR 和 OPPVHR 患者,腹腔镜(182.0±110.0 cm)和开放修复(178.3±99.8 cm)之间的疝缺损大小紧密匹配,p=0.64。LVHR 和 OPPVHR 患者之间具有可比性:平均年龄 57.2±12.1 岁对 56.6±12.0 岁(p=0.52),BMI:32.9±6.6 对 32.0±7.4 kg/m(p=0.16),糖尿病 19.0%对 19.7%(p=0.87),吸烟史 8.7%对 23.0%(p<0.001)。OPPVHR 具有更高的复发性疝(14.2%对 44.9%,p<0.001),更长的手术时间(168.1±64.3 对 186.7±67.7 分钟,p=0.006)和更多的组件分离(0%对 20.3%,p<0.001)。开放组的网片尺寸更大(p<0.001)(634.4±243.4 cm 对 841.8±277.6 cm)。疝复发率相似(10.8%对 9.2%,p=0.62),平均随访时间为 39.3±32.5 对 40.0±35.0 个月(p=0.89)。OPVHR 队列的住院时间更长(5.4±3.0 对 6.3±3.6 天,p<0.001),但 30 天再入院率(4.0%对 6.4%,p=0.31)相似。总体伤口感染率(2.9%对 8.4%,p=0.03)在 OPPVHR 组更高,但 LVHR(1.7%)和 OPPVHR(0.6%)之间的网片感染率相似(p=0.33)。术后疼痛(41.1%对 41.4%,p=0.95)和基于卡罗莱纳舒适度量表的总体 QOL 在 6 个月(p=0.73)和 5 年(p=0.36)时相似。

结论

腹腔镜和开放式腹膜前前修补术治疗大型腹疝的疝复发率、术后疼痛和 QOL 在长期随访中相似。接受 OPPVHR 的患者更有可能复发、复杂、需要组件分离,并且更有可能发生术后伤口并发症。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验